Can they pass in South East Asia if they are to shave their heads to hide that funky hair type?
>>52034762
nose knows
Probably not.
Those skin colors themselves are similar, but the lineaments are obviously different.
>>52034762
we arent that fuckin brown m8
meanwhile in the forests of southern thailand and central peninusla malaysia
live the Asli/Mani, ancient south east asian blacks.
>>52034964
t. Joko Boedihardjo
>>52034762
nah
the lips gave it away. the skin is usual here though
>>52034964
This Jap thinks otherwise.
>>52034964
And besides, aren't the Burmese, Viets and Cambodians swarthy af?
>>52035221
>>52035161
>not the nose
i cannot recall anyone having that nose
>>52035268
>>52035333
>>52035161
How come Anwar Congo looks black? Is he some how part papuan?
His grandsons look indian/arab, not indo either.
weird stuff
>>52035350
Are they the cousins of New Guineans?
>>52035517
Yeah I think so, though New Guineans have some genetic features and physical features which are different from Negritos.
These are the purest ones, found on the andaman islands.
>>52035488
probably still retain his andaman shitblood
>>52035350
>chink race replaced protonig race
but why
>>52035624
They're almost as jet black as the Sudanese are, interesting. Look nothing like them though.
>>52035488
because northern sumatra is basically shipyard province since hundred years, he look african than papuan
>>52035815
they have LITERALLY nothing to do with any modern african population, they're related to Japs and Tibetans as far as haplogroups go lol
>>52035806
don't you know the strength of chink lust and genes? chink sperm will basically dominate your genes, their offspring would looks like one.
pic related half chink, half indon
>>52035864
interesting hypothesis. I didn't realise he was from there, i thought he might be some kind of moluccan or from east nusa
>>52035630
yeah probably that
>>52035806
we wuz azns and shit
>>52036098
>hypothesis
f u
>>52035903
and chad is related to brits and frogs as far as haplogroups go but they still aren't similar to them genetically at all.
If one squad of R1b goes and rapes the shit out of a place in africa it fucks up the haplogroup forever but if every male there has to marry an african female then the modern population will still be 90% african even if they have the R1b y chromosome mutation
Some chinks came in and raped all the andamese. Not surprising but they still wouldn't have made an impact on the islands race as all the dark skin genes would come back out due to natural selection and breeding only with dark women.
Pic related. These guys are R1b but none of their other chromosomes have shit in common with the brits,frogs, or spaniards.
>>52036224
>dark skin genes would come back out due to natural selection and breeding only with dark women.
you don't understand how chinks gene work aren't you?
if anything, we're only gonna be dark again due to climate
>>52036224
>chad
There are actually Hausas with blue eyes and shit.
>talking about countries rather than particular ethnic groups
>Chad is related to france
dumb dumb dumb.
>japs and andamanese aren't genetically close
no shit sherlock andamanese islanders have been stuck on their shitty little islands for 10s of thousands of years, whilst their relatives have been diverging for millenia.
but they share common ancestors, and its not because tibetans or japs raped some andamanese women, they have their own unique haplogroup that happens to be linked with japanese.
>>52036335
What I'm saying is they don't HAVE chink genes
Having a chink haplogroup doesn't mean your people are descendants of chinks.
Chad in africa is my example. They have the celtic/germanic haplogroup but they are genetically identical to all the niggers surrounding them who have the nigger haplogroup.
>>52036500
no you idiot, of course they're not descendants of azns.
They are like a living-fossil of the ancient ancestors of azns.
>>52036500
oh wait, you're talking about andaman.
>>52036531
That's a retarded assumption.
The andamese are part of a bigger ethnicity called the "Great Andamese" which covers many more islands than Andaman and out of all these people only the ones on the island of Anadamn have the haplogroup D174 (The japanese and tibetan haplogroup) All the other coal black islanders nearby have non-asian haplogroups.
It's very unlikely they diverged with the japanese 10,000 years ago. All it takes is a boat full of 100 Slanty eyed jap vikings to rape the shit out of an island like that and they will have the D-Haplogroup FOREVER. However all the other japanese genes will be bred out of them in only 1-200 years as you can clearly tell just by looking at the coal ass mother fuckers.
Haplogroups are a garbage indicator of where ethnicites originated
>>52036474
Jap haploshits are a bit more distantly linked to the Andamanese haplopshits than you R1b folks are to Indonesian Negritos with a related haplogroup P. Haploshits don't mean much and don't tell who's related to who.
>>52036591
Yes, the only asian influence on the genes of the andamese is on the Y chromosome because the Y chomosome is easy to fuck with
I'm Southeast Asian. Back home, we have legends of black people living in the forests. Today we know they are Negritos. They still live in the forests though...
>>52036892
>>52036765
there is even a nepalese isolated language which has similarities with the some of the andamanese langauges.
its not that much of a stretch that Tibetans (who i tihnk are ancestral population-wise to many japs) and Andamanese share ancient ancestors without any black-on-yellow rape.
>>52037396
here is what i was looking for.
the other thing is that i'm not saying they're particularly closely related, but that they probably represent what the ancient ancestors of yellow people looked like 60,000 years ago when they started arriving in asia.
also genetically andamanese people have very little to do with africans.
>>52037396
>>52037485
I think it's mostly chance that dates back 50000 years when there just weren't that many people and some guys had a lot more sons than others. Maybe there were some D guys in Europe slaying Neanderthals but their line went extinct.
>>52037626
>I think it's mostly chance that dates back 50000 years when there just weren't that many people and some guys had a lot more sons than others. Maybe there were some D guys in Europe slaying Neanderthals but their line went extinct.
Yes precisely. However consider that andamanese people are essentially stone age blacks (yet completely genetically distinct from any african population) living on an island in complete and utter isolation from the rest of the world.
One could surmise that this group of negritos, is representative of what some of the first populations to have left africa looked like. Their cousins who didn't get stuck on shitty little islands managed to spend the next few 10s of thousands of years evolving into mongoloids.
>>52037485
I can't believe that I was called an idiot but some tinfoil who thinks that the japanese looked like this 50,000 years ago.
All you have is haplogroups and haplogroups are garabge
>>52037810
>but some tinfoil who thinks that the japanese looked like this 50,000 years ago.
well they weren't in japan at that point.
its crazy but i mean but 50 million years ago japanese and finns and canadians and nigerians looked like pic related.
>>52037810
also im glad i debunked your yellow rapist pirate story.
>>52034762
They smell different anon, people wold notice that really soon.
This is probably a bit pseudoscience, but in Indonesia, each people had different body smell, and sometimes we cant sorta guess where they come from from the smell. I mean, with the discovery of perfurme and deodorant this method of identification are a largely being disadvantaged, but sometimes when people forget to mask their true scent, we know.
>>52037396
You are probably thinking of Kusunda. Indo-Pacific "family", and especially linking Kusunda with it, is pure Greenbergian autism.
>>52038960
yes precisely.
though yes the Indo-Paciic "family" may not be real (though the pronouns in these langauges are very similar iirc)
>>52035986
Indons are pretty much just darker chinks though.
Non-Nordics are truly disgustng.
>>52041249
>Indons are pretty much just darker chinks though.
wut?
>>52041249
Finns are just chinks with lighter skin though
>>52042788
Oh please, the majority of you look like shit just like all ethnicities.
>>52035624
whoa they look like little anime boys but black
>>52036474
the reason 0.01% of Hausas have blue eyes is because 1% of Arabs have blue eyes
>>52037810
You know...
It's entirely possible that Eurasians DID at one point look like this
Before Japan had human settlement tho
>>52041249
not at all
>>52047749
b-but my c-cherrypicked pics
