1.your cunts stance on abortion
2. your stance on abortion
>>51766888
I think in extreme cases like incest, rape and retardation it's permissible I guess. But with adoption as an option for mothers who don't want the baby I think it's pretty cruel to kill a baby just so you don't have to deal with it. I mean you don't have to deal with it even if you have it. Just put it up for adoption.
Then again if I knocked up a girl I didn't want to have a child with I might change my tune and become a massive hypocrite.
>>51766888
1.) Legal
2.) Totally against it except in cases where competent medical authorities have said it poses a significant threat to the life of the mother
don't care
we should do it more often
>>51767051
>>51767112
need to prevent morons like this from existing
>>51766888
for it when it's rape and shit hate it when a teenage girl has wild sex and gets knocked up but because she is "not ready" she just has it aborted..
Should be banned. Fixing the declining population is more important than women crying about how they don't want to ruin their bodies by having a kid.
1. Legal
2. Who gives a shit its literally just cells a that points. Better get rid of it now than to have it grow up to be a neet on welfare
1. Legal
2. It's problematic, while I support the killing of babies, I am still opposed to giving women the right to choose
>>51766888
1. Legal in my city and illegal in 18 states. I don't know what is the abortion status in the other states.
2. In favor. Adult sacrifices don't seem to be satisfying our god's anymore. Maybe if we use younger ones...
>>51766888
1. Legal.
2. It kills the nation but we should go for the cause, not for the aftermath. Parents don't do their job nowadays, they should teach their children to be proper people.
Pretty bad
Really bad
>>51766888
1. It's bad
2. It's good (Roe v. Wade guidelines)
>>51766888
1. mixed
2. I'm totally pro-choice. It's a thing in someone's body, after all.
