Are 'light skinned' people seen as superior in every culture, or is this just a european thing?
What about south america?
east asia?
africa?
>>51702557
why don't you tell us about italy first, OP?
Poo in the loo
>>51702701
That's Cotê-d'Voire
>>51702557
In Haiti mulattoes and lighter blacks are mainly in the upper class while darker blacks eat cookies made of dirt
>>51702557
I don't think white people are seen as superior in Brazil.
There are lot of poor white people here. And I'm talking about white people, not mixed people.
>>51702701
>>51702765
Everytime I post on this board, some Amerautists make these two exact jokes
>>51702841
maybe not officially,but whites are more "trustable" on average
>>51702851
Calm down, Didier
>>51702557
I think it's more about money and nationality than race in the world.
They're definitely considered to be most attractive. I think that's universal.
Intelligence is another matter entirely. Light skinned "Aryan" Indians are literal savages who get BTFO by their coal-skinned Dravidian compatriots in intellectual accomplishments (founding companies, publishing academic papers, running the country's space program, etc.).
>>51702930
This. People in poor countries (Africa, Asia, Latin America) might think people from rich (usually white) countries throw money at them.
>>51703069
t. Vishnuvardhana Krishnadevaraya
>>51702557
No. I will explain to you how it works in Brazil.
You need to be white and FOREIGN to be seen as rich ar maybe superior, even if you are poor.
If you are white and BRAZILIAN, nobody will see you as superior. But There are many poor white people in this country.
>>51703436
arent they polish immigrants in brazil?
>>51703436
Wrong. Money is all that matters in any state that is not some nordestino or commie shithole
>>51703071
True. Even within a rich country where everyone is the same colour find biases based on accent or family names etc.
>>51705466
Yes, It's true
>>51702557
It isn't seen any superior in multiethnical countries , for example Turkey
![kefera-blackface[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/5Bcptvb.png "kefera-blackface[1].png")
>>51705466
>all that matters
That's kind of a lie desu.
>>51705327
Mpst whites in Brazil are of German descent.
Like in pretty much every other new world country.
![thumb_IMG_2070_1024[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/bXm230b.jpg "thumb_IMG_2070_1024[1].jpg")
>>51702557
Lighter skin has always been desirable across cultures and throughout history.
Being tanned or having darker skin was a result (or rather implies) that you had to work outside in the fields. Hence tanned skinned became synomous with being a peasant. Having pale skin (and hence implying you were a noble/of wealth that didn't have to work outside) thus became desible.
There was a reason powdering the face was a trend in Europe and geisha use white face paint.
>>51702557
In pre-colonial Yorubaland smooth coal black skin was seen as the ideal, compared to the brown skin which was most common.
good taste desu
Mesoamericans generally never considered skin tone as an established beauty trait or didn't even care much about physical characteristics. Nevertheless, the features that resembled birds were very appreciated.
Interestingly they compared skin tones to the colours of the maize seeds.
>>51702557
yes
