and we answer without looking it up. I want to see if there's anything to this meme.
why are you so religious
what year did ww1 end
>>/his/
>>/toilets/
>>51594586
country was founded by puritans
>>51594625
1917 I think
>>51594625
1918. Thanks Dan Carlin.
>>51594650
no flags in /his/
When did WWII start
>>51594956
1939
we entered in 1942
d-day june 6 1944
>>51595014
shit *1941
typo
>>51595014
LIES
WWII STARTED MUNICH AGREEMENT 1938 TRAITORS
WUZ BLACKS KINGS 'ND SHIT
How was england created ?
Remember, no looking it up pls
>>51595154
normans and vikings
what was the first battle that Žižka won?
>>51594625
1918
>>51594956
1939
>>51595202
Grunwald?
ALL NORDIC IS SWEDISH CLAY
>>51595224
nah, he was on the losing side at Grunwald, I meant battle of Sudoměř
Who invented the airplane and why was it Alberto Santos-Dummond
When did Timur win over the Ottomans (Bayazid I)?
Who fought in the battle of Trafalgar, what year(s) did it take place and who won?
What was the Thirty Years' War and when did it occur?
>>51595262
Let me translate that into normal-Speak
Can you explain how the histories of Denmark, Norway and Sweden are connected?
What made Adolf Hitlers policies controversial?
>>51595689
All i know about that shit is that Nelson died and he died in 1805 so the British must've won it in 1805
>>51595773
I'd be surprised if anyone outside the Nordics know this. Also, it's a very broad question.
>>51595896
Muh CK2
>>51595752
1618-1648 it was first about religious shit then hansburgs vs anti habsburgs
>>51595773
theyre all vikings
>>51595836
which policies? like when he started forming his regime after 1933 or the shit he pulled right before ww2?
How big was the population of the US in 1900?
>>51595953
habsburgs* god dammit
>>51595953
>theyre all vikings
>all
Buttmad Dane and Nordbros incoming.
>>51595773
Sweden ruled Norway and Denmark? I literally have no idea.
>>51595618
1402
>>51595773
> Can you explain how the histories of Denmark, Norway and Sweden are connected?
I'm not sure I know that question since I'm not sure what you mean. Sweden and Denmark taking turns owning Norway?
>>51596126
Nah son, Denmark ruled Norway and Sweden. Then Sweden rules Norway, all 3 states didn't emerge from this cycle until 1905 when the Sweden-Norway union was dissolved.
Denmark and Sweden actually holds the record of most wars fought between two countries, exceeding even the French and British.
When did Columbus stumble upon the Americas?
>>51595896
I guess if >>51595953 doesn't give a more detailed answer than that, I'll have a go.
No Google was used in the writing of this reply.
Basically after the Viking stuff, and the invasion of England, the christans wanted to "normalise" the northerners. Some kings and nobles were converted and eventually most of scandinavia was catholic.
Skip forward a few hundred years to about 14something, and the Danish king ruled over both Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Then Sweden got tired of this opression and kind of just said "no" to Denmark.
Bit of war later, Sweden OP in battle, they annexed Norway and kind of took over the entire baltic (except the .. germans/prussians) who still had a bit of shore in the baltic sea.
With denmark kek'd by Sweden, and Norway entirely under its control, the Swedes did well for a few decades, until the napoleonetic wars? Or perhaps the thirty years' war.. idk this part is a bit hazy. Anyway Sweden and Norway were on the defensive, with Denmark and a whole bunch of other countries (England, Prussia, Austria?) came to kick their asses.
Sweden tried to trick Denmark (who wanted to annex Norway as part of the peace deal) by releasing Norway as a sovereign state before they made peace. Though Denmark didn't want none of that and invaded Norway anyway. Idk what happened exactly, but eventually the 3 nations stopped fighting, and they haven't had a war with eachother since the 1800's
How'd I do?
>>51596347
1492
what is the bronze age collapse?
>>51595154
Meaning the current english line or the first anglo nations?
>>51596532
Give me all you've got captain
>>51596491
Probably Greek civs falling to barbarians because of degeneracy. It's always because of degeneracy.
>>51594554
>Kinsey Scale
>>51596570
i didn't ask why it happened
i'm asking what it was
>>51596570
But the greeks fell only to Romans and Persians in the East.
>>51594554
when did the holy roman empire dissolve ? And by who?
>>51596405
Breddy gud tbqh
>>51596561
It is very difficult to think about this without looking anything up.
Anglo-Saxons came across the channel from the southeast and conquered local pictish(?) tribes. Start of the anglos. Normans came after that I believe. Roman Empire established territory up there awhile after that. After Roman empire collapse, there were viking invasions and they controlled a lot of the north part.
English eventually allied with France to clear the vikings from the channel and the middle ages set in. There was a bunch of wars between english and french and between english nobles and other english nobles. (War of the roses was one of those).
I know at some point cromwell and the roundheads took over. I think the current royal line took control back from them. Does that count?
>>51596635
1500's. Queen Isabella of Spain? Idk.
>>51596801
Why each state has different laws effectively making it a mini country?
>>51596801
Romans first, chap
Romans> Anglo Saxons> Vikings> Normans.....
....>Afro Carribeans >Subcontinentals> Eastern Europeans
>>51596801
the anglo-saxons came at the time of the roman empire collapsed
>>51597013
what the fuck is a subcontinental
>>51597013
>Romans first, chap
That was the part I really struggled with. All I know about William the Conquerer is he much earlier than Joan of Arc.
>>51597055
english newspeak for paki
top kek
>>51597061
legitimately thought anglosaxons were first though.
>>51596950
Because that's how federalism works. Centralized government is for Asians.
>>51597097
nah celts (called "brits" by the romans) were first
then romans
only then anglos and saxons
>>51594554
Who cooked the first hamburger?
>>51596405
Ehm, no. The Kalmar Union was signed in 1397, but yes the Swedes broke out quite early. Norway on the other hand stayed under danish control until 1814. Denmark(-Norway) was on the french and losing side side under the Napoleonic wars. Norway signed it's own constitution in 1814 and declared ourselves independent. But Sweden had entered the last coalition against France being promised to be handed Norway (I guess compensation for losing Finland to Russia some years earlier). After some confrontation Norway ended up under swedish control until 1905.
>>51597055
>>51597072
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indian_subcontinent
Collectively paki's, Indians and Bangladeshis
Fucking magnets... How do they work?
>>51596801
Quite wrong
Romans invade Alba (meaning white, from the chalk cliffs I think) but can't get to the north, build hadrian wall
Eventually leave, collapse of the empire etc
Saxons and angles come in, pusing celts out, they created petty kingdoms (northumbria, mercia, etc)
Viking invaders come in with Ragnar, Alfred the great, etc
Norman french invade a bit later, BTFO the angles at Hastings and then the last vikings at Stamford bridge, vikings GTFO england
Eventually a norman king marries Eléanore d'Aquitaine, inheriting half of the kingdom of France and beginning the hundread years war
I omitted an invasion of england by Louis somthing in 1300ish that took london but didn't achieve anything of note
That's what I remember
>>51597061
Joan of Arc is 1400ish
>>51597163
Very well done, you got it almost completely correct.
>>51597168
oh ok now i get it
>>51597182
Forgot to the dates of course
romans are grossly till 300
saxons I don't know
vikings is 700-800
Hastings and Stamford is 1066
start of the hundreads year war is 1337, ends in 1456 I believe
>>51596950
They stole it from us desu. We were the first modern republic. And the Dutch republic (and our modern country) worked like that. With each province and each city having the ability to make their own laws, as long as they dont contradict higher laws.
>>51597158
It was created in a German principality so workers could eat while on the go. In Germany, it is considered degenerate and sloth to sit down to eat.
>>51597182
>>51597260
Normans had nothing to do with Stamford. The Norwegians were defeated before the Battle of HAstings.
>>51597263
you're not a republic, you're a monarchy
jk, but no you're not the first modern, just the first to brag about yourselves because you were good at it
>>51597204
Well, then correct it instead of acting like a faggot.
>>51597282
So was it
1. Saxons remove vikings at stamford
2. normans remove saxons at hastings
?
I'll go look it up now
>>51597336
Fuck people are always so fucking on edge and hostile. Fuck it.
>>51597163
Thanks for the clarification, it's good to learn more about teh scandinaviahs. I plan to maybe perhaps possibly move there some day.
>>51597383
quit being a passive agressive fag then
>>51597325
We were. We started the whole revolution thing questioning the divine right of kings.
But our republic was a bureaucratic mess. In the federalist papers the Dutch republic was even given as an example how not to do things. But that didnt stop them from copying it.
>>51597338
Pretty much. Though the saxons never left England, just the Normans became Kings.
Who followed Stalin as leader of the USSR?
>>51597428
Yeah I wanted to write remove saxon kings but it didn't sound right
>>51597460
>guessing
Kruschev
>>51597549
Not bad. Who followed him?
>>51597586
Gorbachev?
>>51597605
Nope he came way later. Brezniev is the right answer.
How long is a Chinese
Who is his wife
>>51597182
Alfred was a Saxon not a viking, unless that wasnt what you meant.
It's a bit misleading to think of all this linearly anyway. At the time of Alfred you had saxons, vikings and Britons all owning different bits, then the saxons evicted the vikings again then as the aussie says the saxons werent entirely displaced by the normans.
Some recent history then:
How are 9/11 and the Second Gulf War related?
>>51597383
I have no problem with being wrong, but then tell me what is wrong instead of this:
>>51597424
Who killed John F Kennedy?
>>51597681
>How long is a Chinese
Yes.
>>51597771
no comment.
>>51594554
REMEMBER THE ALAMO??
>>51597771
ilermenaty
>>51597713
>How are 9/11 and the Second Gulf War related?
Bush spun it, many here thought we invaded Iraq because of 9/11, this was because of the way Bush talked about the two things together.
>>51597713
They aren't.
>>51597771
Fidel Castro in the grassy knoll with the jack ruby.
>>51597771
The commies
>>51597771
You and me
>>51597713
Iraq was working closely with al-Qaeda and sheltering many wanted criminals. I'm pretty sure we wouldn't have invaded Iraq if it weren't true
>>51597860
Are you claiming to be a man of wealth and taste?
Resent history: What is Ronald Reagan's presidency most famous for?
>>51597713
Entirely unrelated. 9/11 lead to the invasion of Afghanistan. The invasion of Iraq in 2003 was due to the supposed possession of WMDs by Saddam Hussein.
>>51596901
1807 I think. and Francis the II. after Napoleon defeated him
>>51595773
There were two kingdoms and Norway had Denmark, Iceland, the West, etc. and Sweden had Finland. Norway and Sweden joined a union at some point but Norwegians left after getting pissy, probably a war but who gives a shit. Anyway in the 1800s Norway left Denmark. Later Finland left Sweden, and in the 1940s the brave Icelanders were liberated by the Danish pigs.
>>51597921
Iran-Contra?
>>51597921
Watergate.
>>51597921
Alzheimer's and trickle down economics
>>51597921
being the first meme presidency
>>51597961
Oh wait, I was thinking of Nixon.
>>51597921
Initiating the semi-rapid collapse of the Soviet Union.
>>51597830
That's not totally true. U.S. intelligence believed the Iraqi government was in league with Al Qaeda and harboring Al Qaeda members.
There is now no way to prove or disprove that.
Why were the Hussites called that and who were they?
this is a gud thred
>>51597900
Well, I have many a man's soul and faith
>>51598021
Jan Hus was their leader, weren't they proto-Protestants or something?
>>51598021
I'm gonna guess they were Polish Hussars left over after Poland was dissolved.
>>51596405
>some kings
OLAV TRYGGVASSON
OLAV FUCKING TRYGGVASSON
SEGJA NAFN SÍNN.
OLAV "KRÍSTINN HANNREIUR" TRYGGVASSON
>>51598044
*stole
>>51598056
pretty much although to be absolutely precise he was not their leader but rather they were followers of his teachings (he got burninated)
>>51597950
>>51597976
>>51598005
Good. Next question: which american president declared the war on poverty which lead to the passing of the Economic Opportunity Act.
>>51597830
>>51597842
>>51597930
Indeed..
>>51597895
Bait?
>>51597771
karma
>>51598196
Johnson
>>51594554
How was the name of the last empress of Hawaii who you and the brits overtrown with cover opt and coup then annexed Hawaii
In which year Texas was annexed
How many navy battles you lost in WW2 with imperial Japan out of all
Name one American president who wasn't involved in any wars.
>>51597681
>How long is a Chinese
3 Kourics
>>51598196
Buck Strickland.
>>51598354
Zachary Taylor
>>51597713
Paranoia and fear led to a massive fuck up facilitated by a misinformed and jingoistic populace.
>>51596632
No the sea people fucked them. IIRC there isn't a huge consensus on who exactly the sea people were other than acting like barbarians and being recorded as far away as Egypt.
>>51598326
- So,ething long with a lot of K's
-1849?
-Fuck if I know, very few and all at the beginning
Can you name at least five independent countries fighting in WW1 outside of the two "big threes"? Commonwealth & the US disqualified.
>>51598354
There aren't any.
>>51598445
Indian Wars, arguably.
>>51598445
Pretty funny you had to pick a former general. But I guess it's true for his presidency.
>>51598077
Olav Haraldsson too.
>>51598255
Correct, now one more: which president proclaimed fire prevention week and what does it commemorate?
>>51598632
Woodrow Wilson and the Triangle Shirtwaist fire.
No clue bakka.
>>51598499
russians, ottoman, austia-hungary, serbia
>>51598499
Serbia, Romania, Japan, Italy and Bulgaria
>>51598679
It's Calvin Coolidge and the great chicago fire. Here's a cookie for trying.
>>51598723
noice
>>51598715
all fought but only one of them is a correct answer to the question
who led the irish rebellion of 1798? what nation gave military assistance?
what is the treaty of westphalia and whats so special about it
>>51598851
end of 30 years' war and creation of "sovereign states"?
>>51598851
is that the one following the prodestant vs catholic war (cant remember the name) which gave princes the right to decide the religion of their dominions?
desu i know little about mainland history
>>51598830
Pat O'Brien.
Ottomans? They might have been famine relief.
>>51598851
Ended 30 Years War, established the idea of national soveriengty.
>>51598942
>Pat O'Brien.
wolfe tone
>Ottomans? They might have been famine relief.
about 60 years early. it was the french.
we lost btw
What sort of animals did Beren and Luthien turn into during their quest to recover a Silmaril from the Great Enemy Morgoth?
>>51599061
Sheep.
>>51599061
no one read the silmarillion nerd. LOTR and the hobbit are the limit for nonautistic reading. the appendix is pushing it.
>>51597182
Stamford was before hastings, the saxon army had to fight then march to face the norman invasion straight after
Roman-Britons were a thing
Normans were frankified norsemen
>>51599123
I would even consider LOTR iffy. Anyone can read the Hobbit but if you get all the way through LOTR, that requires a lot of dry fantasy tolerance.
Historically, Spain has held half territory in 3 European countries as of today.
Which countries were under Spanish rule?
Also, which country was named after a Spanish king?
>>51599123
uh nuhhh you take that back!!
>>51599168
i read it all senpai
t. autisti
>>51598479
>1849
The Texas annexation was the 1845 incorporation of the Republic of Texas into the United States of America, which was admitted to the Union as the 28th state.
werent few lost, maybe half of them maybe even more
>>51599181
>Spain has held half territory in 3 European countries as of today.
>Which countries were under Spanish rule?
i don't get this english, but maybe it's me. you mean navarre, aragon, and castille? or something else?
>>51599181
3rd question
t.
>>51595980
Still waiting for some american to take a stab at this
>>51599687
He meant Belgium, the Netherlands and southern italy I think
>>51599181
1. Netherlands, Italy and ???
2. Filipinas
>>51599858
oh right
they didn't have belgium, only flanders, during the habsburgh rule
>>51595980
Ah shit.
If I had to make a guess, I'd say in the realm of 100 mil.
I know we were bigger than most of the other western democracies by a fair bit, but we hadn't had the baby boom, and had several big immigration waves since.
>>51596620
no one knows, is mystery
>>51595836
Eugenics, lebensraum, master race beliefs
To name a few
>>51600139
well we know a bunch of civilizations and we know they fell at around that time, which is where the names comes from
i was hoping you'd say a couple of civilizations and at around what time it happened but whatever
>>51595980
Do people in Finland really just memorize numbers in history class?
In America, the curriculum tends to focus on how one event led to another more than dates and statistics.
>>51599061
Say what? Didn't they disguise themselves as orcs?
>>51597771
John F. Kennedy, I'm CIA
who was the last of the Mahicans?
>>51594554
what do you guys think of "absolute justice"??
does it come from Christianity?
Italy, Netherlands, and Austria?
2nd question's the Philippines.
>mfw I know fucking nothing about yuro history
I mean fucking nothing. I don't know how in the fuck your countries started, who they've fought, and what they've done to get them into the situations that they're in now.
Can /int/ give a cliffs notes summary of your countries history?
>>51597158
Jesus Christ, lord and savior
>>51597815
Yes.
>>51599181
I know you sent all your Jews to the Netherlands.
>>51606174
Portugal not Austria
>>51606549
you're mums well gay
Why did they open the border between East and West Germany in 1989
1. What types of government did both factions of the English Civil war want to implement?
2. What larger conflict was the English Civil war a part of?
>>51594662
>country was founded by puritans
Of to a bad start, senpai.
