how much cost nice cozy house in your city??
post result from real esatete website
250k euro
4 million euro
500k euro
>>51562633
400-500k euro.
2300 euros
http://domo.plius.lt/skelbimai/parduodamas-gyvenamasis-namas-rokiskio-r-sav-suvainiskyje-2762510.html
275k
http://www.funda.nl/koop/vinkeveen/huis-49586310-vinkenkade-1-k/
Some shitty 3 bedroom terraced house near me sold for £100,000 recently, despite having a massive void underneath it that left it uninhabitable.
For something decent, you're talking at least £200,000
>>51563585
with internet?
>>51564048
Sadly not, there also isn't a toilet inside. My post was a meme, but you can actually buy a half decent house for 12300 euros
http://domo.plius.lt/skelbimai/parduodamas-gyvenamasis-namas-rokiskio-r-sav-raisiuose-2910538.html
450k for a bungalow
AHAHHHHHAAHAHAHAAAHAHAHAHA
This is more like it.
>>51564604
>>51564890
How expensive is a dank shithole around there? The sort of place with 70's storage heaters and more drafts than an industrial wind tunnel?
>>51564965
Depends on the area, London you're still looking at 700+ minimum depending on how dank you want it and what amenities you want.
>>51564965
250
The post-war period really left us in a bugger of a situation.
Tonnes of sq miles of ugly-looking terrace council houses, which are still fairly expensive.
The new housing developments of the last decade or so tend to look better, fortunately.
>>51565102
High Wycombe is expensive because you can get one train into central, same as Cambridge.
Even this millionaires pad looks pretty shitty from outside. Like a giant council house.
>>51565206
Indeed.
I've been trying to get a property in central Cambridge. I start work northwards of Cambridge in a shitty village/town, and I'd rather live in Cambridge and commute to it.
I could have taken a town-house room in the north of Cambridge, on the new Orchard Park development, which is actually pretty nice, but it's separated from central Cambridge by fuckign kilometers-worth of ugly housing estate (Arbury), so fuck it, I don't want to be next to a shitty housing estate.
I'll just have to get a higher paying job after a few months and move to central Cambridge, with any luck.
>>51565064
>>51564965
How the fuck does the average Brit do it? Everyone complains about the house prices here, but you can get a really nice house even in Amsterdam for under 250k euros.
How much mortgage can you get as a starter? Fresh out of uni I can get about €150k max, which limits me to apartments but I don't mind
>>51565475
Pic related, Orchard Park.
>>51565584
And pic related, Arbury
>vomits internally
>people unironically pay nearly 10 times more for a house in the capital city of a country you can drive across in a few hours
Are all Czech people fucked in the head or something?
>>51565551
It's fucking gay.
>>51565551
Lots of people live with their parents into their 30's to save up the money for a house. Also, the further north you go generally the lower the house prices get.
As for mortgages, generally you can get four and a half times your salary if the bank is willing. If you're in a low income area like me, you're essentially fucked.
>>51565703
+1 hour in car is weekend trip
>>51565648
>>51565584
>>51565475
Yea, I lived there for a few years with some friends. Old Cambridge is lovely, the winding cobbled streets and old shops are picture-esque. Though I lived in "New" cambridge most of the time, CB1 down the road from ARU and the CB3(?) right across from the Grafton.
I remember Arbury being a bit shit and Chesterton being alright. Before I left I recall them pushing through a shit ton of flats and small-ish houses, could try and pick up one of those.
>>51565551
Hope the bank gives you big sub-prime loan for 25+ years and pray to god you don't become unemployed or see the recession.
£350k for a 2 bedroom in the suburbs of the shitty city of Maidenhead.
Pffffffffffffffffftttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
That should be 100K tops.
>>51565963
>That should be 100K tops.
It should be sprayed for goblins and fucking demolished. Shit sucks knowing that my workign class parents were able to afford a 4 bedroom house in Outer London and now I'll barely be able to afford a flat in the same area.
>>51565963
How much is a normal house? All of these look depressing as fuck
![houses[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/YPdvbc9.jpg "houses[1].jpg")
>>51566238
Depends what you mean by normal, there are loads of different types of houses depending on the age, the area and the size. Some look good and some look bad. Terraced (or row) houses are usually early 20th century / post revolution and in the centre of town whereas semi-detached are mostly post war and in the suburbs.
>>51566238
These are normal houses.
A large bulk of our housing stock is made up of mass-produced terrace and council housing.
Unfortunately, our terrace housing often looks like pic related, and not like >>51562959, which would be much better, though admittedly that shade of bright orange wouldnt suit the UK.
419.000e
£1 million+
S M H
>>51565760
>>51565762
>>51565900
How were the house prices before the recession?
House prices have been in a decline since 2008 but just started to rise again. Our housing market was majorly fucked by the recession and went totally static with no one buying houses anymore due to several reasons (banks weren't giving out mortgages, rise in unemployment, etc). Prices started to drop, which left everyone who bought a house just before the recession with a mortgage that is bigger than the market value of their house.
>>51566680
Nice picture resolution, faggot.
>>51567157
I do not know about the last few years in particular, but:
"UK house prices have more than trebled in the past 20 years
In 1983, the average UK home cost for a first-time buyer (or buyers in the case of joint mortgages) was the equivalent of 2.7 times their total annual earnings. In 2015 this had risen to 5 times their income."
https://fullfact.org/economy/election_2015_housing-43439
I don't know what the fix is. Build more houses, I guess. Or stop immigration.
285 K euro
>>51567506
We need both of those things plus investment in the North + Midlands and better infrastructure to get there. House prices and availability in London are so fucking terrible because that's where the jobs. If you could get to say Central from Manchester in 45mins or so more people would live further out unclogging London.
>>51568299
>. If you could get to say Central from Manchester in 45mins
Are there even trains which could do that?
Used to take me about 2 hours to get from Bristol to London Bridge.
>>51568094
Very nice.
>>51566238
How depressing a house looks depends on when it was built, largely.
Pic on the left is probably from the last 10 years, when we've started to see better quality housing developments, in my opinion. It isn't great, but it's good.
Pic on the right was probably built in teh decades following WWII; when terrible designers ruled. Fairly large but still looks grim.
>>51569162
HS2 said they *could* do London to Manchester in 1:40 to 1:08 in "Phase 1" and "Phase 2" respectively, but that's such a shit show I doubt it'll ever get built.
>>51569761
Pretty nice t.b.h.
>>51569389
Here's what I mean by the increasing standard of the past decade or so.
Pic related.
Very simply design, but it's classical: it has the symmetry with the door in the centre, no sticky-out roofs or anything (not that I'm against them, they just aren't classical) and a tad bit of ornament on the door.
Not overly impressive, but respectable.
If we're going to *do* suburbia, then we should do it with respectable houses. I don't like suburbia myself, but the New Worlders at least have done it with decent housing.
>>51569761
Interesting design. Windows on the middle level are a bit fucked up.
>>51570032
They could have at least spiced it up with some nicer brickwork and windows
>>51570510
>Spice it up
We don't do it to our food and we don't do it for our houses.
>>51570510
I agree.
The window proportions aren't great, either. The windows on your house are certainly better; alignment with the longer side on the vertical normally looks better, like you see on typical Georgian houses.
Pic related is selling for 250K right now, apparently in really good condition.
$350K USD, house is 400 square meters, and the land is 2200 square meters. Built in the 1920s by GE in the northeast, so excellent build quality. No repairs needed, and everything in the pics except for the sidewalk and street are owned by you.
dunno, 70.000 USD or something like that probably.
>>51572928
Post your definition of a nice cozy house
>>51572862
very nice from outside but forniture looks really cheap
>>51572862
Is it still going to have those shitty interior walls that rot and break that most American houses have?
Also damn the interior decor is from the 1920s too I see.
>>51576742
>like most
great job believing the memes çuckboy
