We stand with Turkey
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zBGlzxc667E
>>51503458
kill yourself japan stands with nobody.
>>51503458
Fuck Turkey
Real japanese hate islam.
Leave zainichi.
>Turks are cockroaches
>cockroaches survive nukes
>Japan survived 2 nukes
coincidence? I think not.
Thank you Turkey for blockading Bosporus.
>>51503649
Real Koreans hate islams as well 2bh
>>51503695
Zainichis aren't real Korean nor japanese. It's like almancis.
>>51503458
I refuse
>>51503676
>Field Marshall Oyvey Lmao
>>51503649
Not really. We aren't hostile to it very much. Rather Japanese and Korean sects and Russians are more dangerous for us.
>>51503656
>Turkey is Russia's enemy
>Japan is Russia's enemy
>An enemy's enemy will be an friend
>Turkey and Japan can be friends.
>>51503695
Is there muslim people in S. Korea?
This OP doesn't even know what he says means.
It seems that he wants to stand with Turkey just because Japan and Turkey have historically had great friendship, but in such a situation we have to ignore it and consider the international situation itself.
So, I DO NOT agree with him. Japan must stand with neither Turkey nor Russia, I guess.
>>51503656
Shut the fag up jews, who have been REAL cockroaches that spread all over the world and survive any insecticide by the name of "Holocaust"
>>51503649
No.
I don't hate Muslims.
>>51503874
who cares
there is no hostility between japan and russia nowadays
>>51503962
Yes. Millions.
disagree.turkey is not justice.
>>51504002
You should hate muslims desu
t. T*rk
>>51503676
ily2 :3
>>51503458
İyi desu.
>>51504054
Why?
There is no reason to hate them.
>>51503458
FUCK YEAH!!
Thank you very much for rescuing Japanese.
Our friendship is immortal forever.
I love you, Turkey :)
>>51504014
But there's no evidence that Russia has friendly relation with Japan either. Even so, it'd steal Japanese money and technology. For you, it's a friendly relationship?
>>51503458
Why is J*pan such a shit country?
>Be random island in the middle of the pacific.
>Invade the entire East Asia, slaughter everyone.
>Deny the war crimes to this day.
>Get nuked to shit.
>Turn from batshit insane savage warrior race into autismal KV nerds.
>Invent the abomination that is anime.
>Men are such beta pussies the population is in decline despite numerous government efforts to increase it.
>1 out of every 200 Japanese women have been involved in a porn movie.
>There are fucking gender segregated busses for fuck's sake, because tiny dicked Jap men can't control their hands.
>Japan is also the favorite country of numerous fat neckbearded American autists.
Korea is much better. They would probably hand your ass to you in case of a war by the way.
>>51504167
there is a state called neutral you dumb fuck
>>51503638
As much as I agree sometimes Germany-kun, Turkey is kinda bro-tier, what would happen if Turkey sent millions of those refugees to Europe? It's the only stronghold between Europe and Syria.
>>51504151
90% of them are really deluded about their religion and don't understand that it's their own fault that the middle east is such a shithole. Because of this they keep blaming the jews and americans for shit they themselves are causing.
The only reason why Turkey is able to be even remotely stable is because Turks on average arent as religious as arabs.
>>51504313
>Turks on average not religious
Not true mate. The real reason is because Turks when to draw the line and not fall into the hands of ultimate retardation.
OP must be Netouyo.
>>51504191
>Invade the entire East Asia, slaughter everyone.
>Deny the war crimes to this day
>Korea is much better.
How can you a retard in worst Korea be such a coward who cannot even post a banter with his own flag?
>>51503458
Turks are bro tier
>>51504313
>90% of them are really deluded about their religion
Hmmmm, the ones who come to Japan might be irregularities lol.
Anyway, they assimilate to Japan while observing their rules.
>>51504313
Well to be honest Americans, UK and France has a hand in the situation middle-east is in but it is in the hands of Arabs to stop the retardation, which they don't.
i sit with turkey
>>51504526
I think japan is in the same situation as the unites states in terms of Muslims.
You guys only got upper class/smart Muslims while Europe got all the retards.
>>51504607
Only if you bring nargile & coffee
>>51504631
only if you pay for it
>>51503458
Japan stands forever alone
>>51504637
Come on now UAE is rich, Turkey isn't
>>51504789
I suport a Turkish administrated zone in the north of syria. That's where the oil is right?
I also support deporting all Turks and Syrians from Germany to this zone.
>>51504541
>Well to be honest Americans, UK and France has a hand in the situation middle-east
We do?
>>51504893
You guys could lol.
>>51504866
>Turks from Germany
You had the chance to send them all back home after gasterbeiter period, you didn't.
Now there are alamancıs in Germany that are neither Turks nor Germans, just stuck in a limbo, that doesn't feel home in either country.
>>51504779
Germans don't stand, they sit, especially while peeing
NUKE THEM BOTH
>>51504893
Yeah
Who invaded Iraq with USA?
Perfidious Albion
>>51504985
>Who invaded Iraq with USA?
Poland ironically
>>51504893
You colonized the area, remember? Also drew the borders and assigned the leaders from minority groups so they would be depended on you and the rest of country would be in unrest.
America also intervened, backing up islamists to fight back communism in cold war, then later on backed up islamists to fight leader that weren't pro-american and didn't want to play their economic game.
In any case, it is their fault ultimately for not setting themselves right and being so prone to manipulation but still.
I heard Turks clean their jewelry with sand.
Is this true?
>>51504996
Poland doesn't give a fuck
No terrorist here
>>51504313
>Turks on average arent as religious as arabs.
They've elected Islamists or Islamist sympathizers over and over, their military would step in every 10 years from the 50's to the late 90's to shut them the fuck down and put Kemalists in power again but now the military has been gutted and it's only a matter of time until Erdogan ruins the country.
>>51505002
If you knew anything about your own countries history you know that they were mostly mandatory territories created from the ottoman empire.
>>51505022
How stupid are you m8? Poland contributed just as much to it as we did. Ages later weve done nothing since so why are we more to blame than you lot?
>>51505034
You are retarded, in 80s coup, by America's orders, our military established religious teachings in school.
Turkey elected right-wing conservatives, yes, but Islamism truly started after the 80s coup, when the school books were changed to be both more nationalistic and religious, as a counter-weight to communism.
Turks are still largely retarded politically, but the flavour of retardation is religious nationalism, not islamism.
>>51503730
Why a u use german proxy?
Horu horu?
>>51505062
Yeah but you are evil
>>51505043
After Ottoman empire collapsed. UK and French colonized it with arbitary borders to keep them unstable and depended on the colonizer overlords.
Go read about the history of the territory after 1920s and how Britain and France administrated Iraq and Syria. Don't forget to read about how Britain promised same land to 4 different groups of people as well.
>>51505082
What good has Poland contributed to the world? We elevated a third of the world while you shat all over eastern europe and got raped to shit by sweden, austria and russia.
>>51505119
Did you even read my post? I said they were MANDATORY. They werent colonised by empires, they were assigned by the league of nations so that they could be governed properly until independence. Learn your own history idiot
Guys, just eat kebab and calm down.
>>51505158
>elevated
You turned it into war-torn shithole with no hopes for improvement
You made their economy not develop to keep buying cheap resources for your factories
You are literary the reason africa is as shitty as it is
Anglos are the cancer that is killing mankind
>>51503458
Yes
>>51505187
And you pretend as if this was somehow benign?
I already know about the proposed narrative of the governance of UK, doesn't mean that was the aim, only a façade.
Like how USA invaded Afghanistan to "protect the freedom & democracy)
>standing with muslims of any kind
ishygddt
>>51505301
Finland and Turkey and Japan signed a three-country alliance , it will defeat the Russian!
>>51505301
Because our interests harmonizes because of Roachya.
>>51503656
based jew poster, i came to say this initially
>>51505213
Despite the fact that all of our colonies turned out better than others?
As for war, it was granted independence in 1932 and did not have a war until the 80s. Youre just an idiot basically
>>51505272
And what does this supposed facade have to do with the current situation as we were talking about? The Ottoman Empire was the one to ruin the area, so how we caused the current situation apart from Israel and Palestine I do not know.
Yeah why not, Turkey is cool
I think
>>51505435
are moslems allowed to browse 4chan, arent you going to hell for this?
>>51505475
It's a blue board
halal
>>51505400
>Despite the fact that all of our colonies turned out better than others?
French, Spanish and Portuguese colonies are better than your native colonies. You don't compare US, Canada, Australia and NZ to rest. You should be comparing Mexico to India, French Africa to British Africa, Hong Kong to Macau
>and what does this supposed facade have to do with the current situation as we were talking about?
Ethnic and religious conflict in the area caused by arbitary borders and minority administration put in charge of majority population hasn't got anything to do with colonialism somehow?
>The Ottoman Empire was the one to ruin the area
Ottoman empire ruined the area economically due neglect, UK actively acted upon their own interest to keep the area unstable and depended on outside forces.
>>51503458
we stand alone forever
I like Turley 2bh but this and that are totally different subject
>>51505592
Turkey*
fix
>>51505545
>You should be comparing Mexico to India
Not comparable at all
>French Africa to British Africa
Ours are better. The only liveable places in French Africa are Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco and the rest is the bottom of the barrel in regards to living standards.
>Hong Kong to Macau
Well I think that ones obvious
>>51505196
oh,yeah
>>51505637
>Not comparable at all
Completely comparable, in fact almost equal. Both were the "crown jewel" of the empire, made possible by overtaking another populous civilization rich in resources and exploiting the resources with a government in place representative of the crown.
>Ours are better. The only liveable places in French Africa are Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco and the rest is the bottom of the barrel in regards to living standards.
No? Best places to live in Africa (of native origin) are former French colonies.
>Well I think that ones obvious
Yes, Macau is richer.
>>51505545
>>51505637
Whoops pressed post early
>Ethnic and religious conflict in the area caused by arbitary borders and minority administration put in charge of majority population hasn't got anything to do with colonialism somehow?
Youre talking as if they asked for a split before they became independent. None of these territories did, and we split some of them anyway such as Singapore and Malaysia. They all asked for independence intact and thats what they got. When the borders were drawn no one thought of independence, and why should they have assumed it would hapen on those borders? This argument is idiotic.
>Ottoman empire ruined the area economically due neglect, UK actively acted upon their own interest to keep the area unstable and depended on outside forces.
Why would it be in our own interest to make the places worth less? The only place where it was in our interest was India
>>51505775
>Completely comparable, in fact almost equal. Both were the "crown jewel" of the empire, made possible by overtaking another populous civilization rich in resources and exploiting the resources with a government in place representative of the crown.
These countries share nothing in common other than they were 'crown jewels'. A poor argument for a poor comparison.
>No? Best places to live in Africa (of native origin) are former French colonies.
Youre either deluded or retarded, the worst africa countries are all almost french ones. There are only three which are worth living in at all, the rest youd likely die in. Even portugal and germany did a better job in africa, the only one which did worse was belgium in regards to living standards. I really cant tell if you are being serious or not or are tricking me.
>Yes, Macau is richer.
Alright you are just trolling
>>51505787
>Why would it be in our own interest to make the places worth less?
Because it would be depended on UK while UK can easily take advantage of the resources. Unified populations with clear-cut borders based on ethnicities would be problematic.
>Youre talking as if they asked for a split before they became independent. None of these territories did, and we split some of them anyway such as Singapore and Malaysia.
There were different demands from UK's representatives, such as the king of Jordan which was promised
They all asked for independence intact and thats what they got. When the borders were drawn no one thought of independence, and why should they have assumed it would hapen on those borders? This argument is idiotic.
It is just a recipe for disaster from a region that has only been without conflict because they have been subjugated by a bigger empire.
I am not saying it is entirely British or colonial fault the region is in the situation it is now, it isn't, but thinking UK governance in the area ever hoped to accomplish anything different is dishonesty and in fact an insult to success of British Empire.
>>51505960
>These countries share nothing in common other than they were 'crown jewels'. A poor argument for a poor comparison.
How do they share nothing in common. They share so much in common in how they have been conquered, governed, their function in a global empire and the state they were left in.
>Youre either deluded or retarded, the worst africa countries are all almost french ones. There are only three which are worth living in at all, the rest youd likely die in. Even portugal and germany did a better job in africa, the only one which did worse was belgium in regards to living standards. I really cant tell if you are being serious or not or are tricking me.
Tunisia, Morocco, Seychelles, Gabon, Mauritius compared to Nigeria and Uganda.
Portuguese and Spanish ones are better as well, true.
>Alright you are just trolling
Macau has higher GDP per capita by far. I am not sure if you can use google or not.
>>51505998
>Because it would be depended on UK while UK can easily take advantage of the resources. Unified populations with clear-cut borders based on ethnicities would be problematic.
And what resources did Africa have? And why did we leave some together such as Egypt?
>I am not saying it is entirely British or colonial fault the region is in the situation it is now, it isn't, but thinking UK governance in the area ever hoped to accomplish anything different is dishonesty and in fact an insult to success of British Empire.
Well firstly I never said that, and secondly your comparisons are ridiculous. Mexico to India? Well Mexico was worse than India until more recently. And then saying that the French african colonies were better than anyone elses other than belgiums, thats just ridiculous. Almost all of the ones at war right now and at the bottom of the HDI pile are french ones. And as for Macau and Hong kong, have you ever been there and seen the different living standards?
The elevations were a sideline not the main goal sure but that doesnt mean they didnt happen, and that doesnt mean I said I claimed that either. And youre being ridiculous with the comparison to french africa, which is the worst easily excluding the beglain congo.
>How do they share nothing in common. They share so much in common in how they have been conquered, governed, their function in a global empire and the state they were left in.
Since when did colonial mexico have company rule, princely states, indirect rule, crown rule, multiple major religions and ethnicities, an extraordinarily large population, I could go on forever. Theres absoloutely almost nothing at all in common with their history, the way they were ruled, the way they were conquered, or even how they were treated.
1/2
>>51506401
>Tunisia, Morocco, Seychelles, Gabon, Mauritius compared to Nigeria and Uganda.
Compare
Chad, French Congo, Mali, Benin, Ivory Coast, Cameroon, Senegal, Togo, Gabon, Djibouti, Madagascar, Mauritania, Niger, Guinea, Algeria, Tunisia, Morocco
to
Egypt, Mauritius, Seychelles, Namibia, Botswana, Kenya, Sudan, Zambia, South Africa, Uganda, Tanzania
>Macau has higher GDP per capita by far. I am not sure if you can use google or not.
If all it comes down to is GDP per capita then British Africa is clearly the winner against French Africa. But of course it is not, and Hong Kong is genuinely a better place to live than Macau. Macau doesnt even have a million people so is left out of the HDI indeces now and is an extremely cramped place. It feels like old Kowloon in many places.
>>51506641
And I forgot to say that Macau has many foreign registered companies while Hong Kong is mostly companies that are operating there and is one of the financial centres of the world, as compared to whatever you think Macau to be.
>>51506641
don't bully gabon
>>51506823
Im not m8
And to be honest Singapore is a better place to live than both Hong Kong and Macau put together so his argument is stupid anyway
I rather trust Turkey than Russians. Especially since Russians are always provoking scandinavian countries and act like an asshole.
And despite that, there's plenty of norwegian russiaboos who love russia merely because Russia who think life in Norway would actually improve if putin invaded and annexted Norway.
>>51506401
>And what resources did Africa have? And why did we leave some together such as Egypt?
Egypt wasn't included in the Arabian peninsula government competition fuckery that's why.
>Well firstly I never said that
What are you arguing then?
>And as for Macau and Hong kong, have you ever been there and seen the different living standards?
Only to Hong Kong
>Since when did colonial mexico
Viceroyalties, crown rule, multiple ethnicities, population large for standards of the day.
They were both conquered by small expeditions of an empire that ended up being major trade hub and resource extraction with the local populations being subjugated to representative local rulers from the mainland empire with region divided rule
There is a lot similar between the function and purpose of both lands. If any colony from Spain and Britain would be compared, the most similar would be Mexico and India.
>>51506641
French has some of the worse ones (so does England) but they also have the best ones, while English ones are bad to mid tier ones .
>But of course it is not, and Hong Kong is genuinely a better place to live than Macau.
By what standards? I haven't been to both places myself but I have heard other way around regularly
fuck off all
T U R K E Y
U
R
K
E
Y
What is Japan's relationship with China at the moment?
Like Korea or more newtral?
>>51503458
A case of roaches getting together. Bring designated into your team as well.
>>51503458
love you japan, you guys have a grip unlike spineless colonist europeans.
>>51507040
also love you kazakbro.do you like nazarbayev btw?
>>51506980
>Egypt wasn't included in the Arabian peninsula government competition fuckery that's why.
It has nothing to do with whatever youre on about, almost all colonies were let go intact and by all colonisers. There was nothing special about that area except mandatory palestine
>What are you arguing then?
My point still, that it improved most of them.
>French has some of the worse ones (so does England) but they also have the best ones, while English ones are bad to mid tier ones .
I think theres quite a large difference in the ones I listed. At least half of the british ones are liveable, almost all of the french ones are total shitholes. The french HAVE the worst ones, while we arguably have the best in africa. Mauritius, Seychelles, Namibia, Botswana, Zambia, Egypt are all fine to live in, Rhodesia used to be until mugabe fucked it up and South Africa has a higher GDP than most of Africa put together. All france has is tunisia, algeria and morocco. Tell me how many french colonies have had wars in the past 20 years now?
>>51507165
>nazarbayev
he is our first president so I cant compare him to others
but I think he could do it much better
>>51505034
learn history burger, during 90's leftist really messed with avarage conservative citizen. the goverment was more anti islamic than cheap polish prostitues also this >>51505077
>>51507237
Hope we can get rid of western cultural imperialism and islamism, so our rennesaince will begin. also there are a few turkmen and kazak students in my university, you guys are really bro tier
>>51507179
Seychelles was under French rule more than it was British.
I'd much rather live in Tunisia than Egypt, also I'd much rather live in Gabon than any British colony in Africa except South Africa but that's a mess as well.
>>51507460
>Seychelles was under French rule more than it was British.
The Seychelles was under French rule for 38 years and British for 182 years
>I'd much rather live in Tunisia than Egypt, also I'd much rather live in Gabon than any British colony in Africa except South Africa but that's a mess as well.
Namibia, Botswana, Seychelles, Mauritius and Egypt are better to live in than all of the ex-French colonies except Tunisia. Tunisia may be the best but that doesnt necessarily mean the others are any good.
>>51503458
unite when
>>51507946
soon brother
