Why is the western world sacrificing our own children to the third world muslim horde?
Just think about how many children have been raped so far and will be raped in the future. I already know about the 7 year old German girl that was brutally raped in that park in Germany by some African.
People have been sold the egalitarian "blank slate" theory at the expense of evolutionary psychology.
Therefore the decline of patriotism, tradition, sanctity.
The "blank slate" theory is the root of most problems with society. Without it feminism wouldn't be able to exist, the "one world one nation" no borders fantasy wouldn't be able to exist, multiculturalism wouldn't be able to exist, etc.
Good luck undoing a lifetime of indoctrination, though.
>>51112291
>>51112523
btw you have John Locke's "Tabula Rasa" to thank for all of this bullshit.
>>51112523
>Good luck undoing a lifetime of indoctrination, though.
I can't imagine it will be able to last much longer. A few more terrorist attacks and more innocent white children being sodomized by "refugees" and maybe people will start to realize that there are different types of humans and some of them are hopelessly primitive, violent, and impossible to civilize.
>>51112523
Fall of the roman empire.
-Internal corruption
-decline of moral standards
-Over reaching military
-Barbarian invasions that want to come in and become citizens to get better life than shitty barb life.
- Rise of christian faith
SOUNDS FAMILIAR TO THINGS HAPPENING TODAY?
>>51112291
I'm one of those children, save me pls.
>>51112732
I think blacks are probably the only "race" unable to be civilized naturally.
Culture plays a huge part, many white tribes were barbarians before the Romans civilized them. All you need to do is take one look at white people today compared to the past to see the large impact culture plays on the way people act.
All "races" are bloodthirsty animals deep down, capable of slavery, genocide, and oppression. That said there are some slight differences in average IQ and such.
But there is still an underlying biology with set behaviors and set things that people expect from the world in order to be happy. And one of those things is a somewhat culturally homogeneous society. History is littered with tales of bitter rivalries between opposing cultural groups in societies and nations from around the world. It goes back to our tribal days. We *need* an "us" and a "them", we expect it from the world. There is no point suppressing it. It can only function as a one way street. Multiculturalism doesn't work -- it will simply result in a dominant culture replacing the subjugated one -- and then things will return to normal again, with a strong cultural identity, traditions, and strong sense of community. These are basic human rights that have been robbed from the people of Western countries.
>>51112803
Didn't Rome try to stop the migrating barbarian refugees though?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossing_of_the_Rhine
>On the east bank, the mixed band of Vandals and Alans fought a raiding party of Franks. The Vandal king Godigisel was killed, but the Alans came to the rescue of the Vandals, and once on the Roman side, they met with no organized resistance. Stilicho had depleted the garrisons in 402 to face Alaric in Italy.
It sounds like they would have stopped the Germanic "refugees" if they hadn't depleted their forces from previous fighting. That's what is so crazy about this shit. Any European nation has a military that could easily decimate these savages, and the US could certainly do it without breaking a sweat, and yet people are waving around "REFUGEES WELCOME" signs and now we're bringing thousands of the bastards over here.
I don't think Rome ever became quite this crazy.
deserved it kek
>>51113231
Like I said.
Fall of Rome = Fall of Western Civilization
I study and teach history. This shit is freaky as fuck. Ive been seeing the patern for the last 10 years and now it's becoming way too real.
>>51112291
>caring about white people
There is nothing you can do to stop your extinction anyway.
>>51113094
>Multiculturalism doesn't work -- it will simply result in a dominant culture replacing the subjugated one -- and then things will return to normal again, with a strong cultural identity, traditions, and strong sense of community. These are basic human rights that have been robbed from the people of Western countries.
I can't imagine that we will continue to just sit here and take it until we're eventually replaced though. People are already furious over here, many states are refusing to take in any of them, and I don't think we've even gotten the first pack of "refugees" yet.
There has to be some kind of breaking point because I'm pretty sure that most people at least secretly think this way. They see the chimpouts in Baltimore and Ferguson or they see the videos of the "refugees" going feral across Europe and they're disgusted, but they just stop themselves from coming out and saying that these people are filthy savages that should be shot.
Maybe a lot of the Swedes are actually hopeless and they've really bought into this bullshit, but I get the impression that most people are just biting their tongue so they won't appear racist. The truth is just so obvious and right in front of us. If that's the case for most people then there has to be some point where these savages just go too far, the violence becomes too common, and people stop hiding their real opinions.
>>51113773
Yeah, I really hope you're right. It'd shut this cunt right up wouldn't it. >>51113725
That's the thing, it's got to the point now where we have our faces rubbed in it. I understand what you're saying. We are a proud people who have made some mistakes (like all races have at some point) but have given so much to the world. Me and you - we don't deserve this. The narcissists and psychopaths who dominated the highest rungs of the Nazi regime did. They were hung. But not us. What have we done?
I brush shoulders with a lot of young, white, educated twenty somethings down in London. They are indoctrinated with the "blank slate" theory. They seem to have, at best, a vague understanding of human nature but believe we can "overcome our primitive urges", at worst, complete denial such a thing even exists, and that everything we are is the result of society. They genuinely believe we are moving towards some progressive utopia where everyone has moved on from our barbaric past that has spanned hundreds of thousands of years. I guess it's nice and cosy to think this way. Not just because it's nice to think that if only we remove "ignorance" and "bigotry" we can all live in happy harmony. But more so because to resist this social narrative, to go against the grain and accept uncomfortable truths, means to some extent alienating yourself from society. Certain films and TV shows become annoying instead of funny. The news annoys you. You are left with an endless gnawing in your head of "why is this happening? why is nobody doing anything about it? can't they see?". It's nice to live in a cosy bubble. It's EASY.
People don't want to think. They want to consume and they want to be happy. They don't want to grapple with the tough questions that arise from the admittance that there is a human nature that expects certain things. So they don't. They'll carry on watching TV, smoking weed, and attending the marches with their "Refugees Welcome" signs.
>>51112803
>>51113398
Care to expand on this? I'm not too familiar with the fall of the Roman Empire but I've seen it compared to contemporary society multiple times on here
>>51112291
rape is good
>>51112523
Agreed, tabula rasa is socialist bullshit
>>51115543
The roman empire was pretty much the height of culture and civilization back in the day.
They had reach a level that is incredible for the times. Evolving from a simple city state and "stealing" concepts and technologies from other tribes and city states they eventually grew to ridiculous levels.
They we're far beyond everyone. But they had a weird system. They needed to keep expanding. Because, gain new lands, steal tecnologies and inventions, plunder ressources, make people living there citizens of the empire. Force a tax on them and eventually bring roads, colisseums, bathhouses and other great roman inventions to them.
This system was causing probleme as you can see from pic. The empire was becoming much too large and it became hard to sustain both financially and militarilly.
Nobody wanted to enlist in the army to defend the empire. They prefered lazing around in the capital and do jack shit.
barbarians were starting to break through from all sides because it was barely defended. The empire even stroke deals with some of them and hiring them as mercennaries. Hiring barbs, to stop other barbs. THAT'LL GO WELL.
One of the reason for these barbs coming in is the empire itself. They knew of the great shit. ANd they wanted to get in on that. Being a roman citizen gave you acess to alot of great stuff. During the earlier days, it was possible for rich foreigners to buy their citizenship. This was later lowered because they empire needed money to sustain itself. So let more people come in and give us money. But these hordes coming in didnt contribute anything to the empire and help increase it's decay. Because they didnt try and fit it. They we'rent integrated and assimilated into roman culture like it was previously done when a new province was conquered and added to the empire.
Meanwhile, in the capital, the plebians we're being lazy fuck. Become more and more deviant and decadent. You've heard of the sentence "bread and games".
All of this shit stems back to the atavistic revolt of degenerates that was the French Revolution. We've been trapped in varying degrees of crazy bullshit ever since.
>>51116957
>Nobody wanted to enlist in the army to defend the empire. They prefered lazing around in the capital and do jack shit.
Sounds like their racial stock had deteriorated from mixing it up with foreigners. The traits that made the early Romans psychologically strong and ambitious men with warrior spirits were diluted with foreign blood. It's sad how dysgenics seems to infect an empire and rot it away from the inside.
>>51116957
well that sentence refers to the same stuff we have now.
Keep the local populace distracted and fed. So they dont annoy you.
Meanwhile the political elite running this shit we're stuffing money in their pockets directly from the empire's treasury. Money that could have been used to fix and maintain the crumbling empire.
And then the Christians came around. Rome was polytheistic. When they conquered a new tribe, they would just include their god into the roman pantheon. A way to assimilate and control the new people while making sure they became roman.
The christians came around and be like, bitch there's only one god. Religion spreads like wilfire through the empire for the next 2 centuries. Creates political and social instability. Eventually even the empire renounces it's own pantheon of gods in favour of Christiannity.
The principles of that religion keep eroding the values of the roman empire and eventually
with all this shit combine. Some weird fucker from the east comes around with an army and LOADS of BARBS and pushes Rome's shit in in the 5th century.
GG no re roman empire of the west. Bye bye culture and civilization for another thousand years. Also sorry im drunk if this sounds like mad rambling. Do go read up on the roman empire. Quite good stuff.
>>51117265
>Romans psychologically strong and ambitious men with warrior spirits were diluted with foreign blood
The fuck are you on about? Those German barbarians didn't have "warrior spirit"?
The issue is clearly a cultural one, Rome was gone before it let the immigrants in.
>>51117367
Thanks for the post, it's something I've been meaning to read up on, but it all seems a bit depressing. Another reminder of human nature.
>>51117367
>>51116957
I'm very drunk right now but if some other good /his/torians would like to add to this it would be nice. I haven't taught the roman empire in high school for awhile so my memory is a bit rusty.
>>51117537
Those immigrants helped Rome, at least genetically. If it wasn't for the Germanics then Northern Italians would look and behave like sub-human shitskins in Southern Italy. As Tacitus wrote, “Are the Germanics a healthy and natural people that will overcome the decadence of the Romans?”
Just go to Northern Italy and see how clean, friendly, and white everyone is and then go down to Naples and look at how dirty everything is, how brown the people are, how crime is rampant, and try to count how long it takes before someone tries to steal something from you. This is the blood that I'm talking about. They have the blood of North Africans mixed in, mostly Semites, and also black slaves.
>The original Romans did not descend from the original inhabitants of the Italian soil, but of the Italici (italios or italiotas or as you please to call them) and probably also of Illyrian groups, namely, Indo-European invaders who entered Italy from the North, what is now southern Germany. These early invaders—from whom the Latins descended (considered the most influential and who eventually gave their language to the Empire), the Sabines (considered by Plutarch “a colony of the Lacedaemonians”), the Umbrians, Samnites and all patrician clans that founded Rome and the Republic—were indeed mostly Nordic, and also formed the basis of the political and military elite of the Empire.
>However, in the later Rome these groups formed an aristocratic minority ruling over a mob of pre-Indo-European origin and, later, even Semites and black slaves. This ended up in interbreeding between all these groups. Over time, the numbers of the dominant Nordic caste withered, and with them their strong patriarchal, sober and authoritative influence in favor of the dissolution of the Empire: expressed in its cosmopolitanism, multiculturalism and proliferation of slaves.
>>51118433
>The rest of the history of the post-Roman imperial splendor and their great men, we already know. It is set in a decadent agony, punctuated by binges, parties, orgies, wine snobbery, false sophistication, acrobats, gays, fads, obesity, blond wigs made from hair stolen from Germanics, mongrels, pacifists, emboldened slaves, “liberated” women, Christian zealots and a corrupt bourgeois which reneged of their homeland.
>The ghost of ancient Etruria, killed by the ancient Latin Patriarchs, had reborn. Before these decaying monsters, which had nothing to do with the demigod patricians or their rude peasants and patriotic soldiers, the Germanic “barbarian” was really an authentic, pure, hard, strong, noble, idealistic, simple and brave hero, in whose blood awaited the hidden forces of the Indo-European humanity, ready to give birth and germinate in the next millennia of European power.
>>51112523
>>51114657
Could you expand on the 'blank slate' theory, lad?
>>51113094
>I think blacks are probably the only "race" unable to be civilized naturally.
and when one black race does you'll shift the goalpost.
>>51118949
Also what do you define as civilized naturally?
>>51118949
>and when one black race does you'll shift the goalpost.
They still haven't managed it yet and if they ever do then they will have been millions of years behind everyone else on the planet except maybe abos.
>Rape, including child rape, is increasing at shocking rates in South Africa. Sexual violence against children, including the raping of infants, has increased 400% over the past decade
Yeah. It seems unlikely that these people are going to become civilized anytime soon.
>>51118433
Northern Italy has barely any genetic Germanic input though, they're mostly Romanised Celts (Cisalpine Gaul)
The Alps have always provided for a strong genetic barrier
>>51118433
>>51118482
Interesting. I didn't know that Rome was founded by Nordics.
>>51118800
"Blank Slate" refers to the mind of an individual being a blank slate onto which experiences, culture, and everything else is scribbled on to. It denies that we have an innate human nature, which is the problem with it. From the "Tabula Rasa" (blank slate) Wikipedia page:
>Important evidence against the tabula rasa model of the mind comes from behavioural genetics, especially twin and adoption studies. These indicate strong genetic influences on personal characteristics such as IQ, alcoholism, gender identity, and other traits. Critically, multivariate studies show that the distinct faculties of the mind, such as memory and reason, fractionate along genetic boundaries. Cultural universals such as emotion and the relative resilience of psychological adaptation to accidental biological changes (for instance the David Reimer case of gender reassignment following an accident) also support basic biological mechanisms in the mind.
The evidence is there that there is an innate human nature, and even that gender is innate, and primarily not a social construct...
http://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/dec/02/men-women-brains-wired-differently
Yet, we still have to grapple with egalitarian equalism and the ideologies that stem from it every day (feminism, multiculturalism, etc.)
Ironically, the ones calling us "ignorant bigots" are actually the ignorant ones themselves.
>>51119132
All Africans are 1 people amirite lol.
>>51118949
>>51119028
Eh, out of everything I've typed in this thread, that one sentence is the one I'd be most likely to have my mind changed on.
With enough cultural imput, it probably could happen. If you got black people when they are young, and subjected them to strict schooling and moral standards, say of the kind we had 100 years ago, then you could probably generate a black civilisation. It could definitely happen. I understand that culture does play a large role in people's personality. Hell, just look at the state of most women today.
But I can't seem to shake the evidence. They have statistically the lowest IQ, so this immediately puts them at the bottom of the list in terms of likeliness for a black civilisation to emerge.
I've always been good at noticing patterns. I can't help but notice how well Asians assimilated into American culture, and then note their average IQ levels being above whites. Contrast this with blacks being the lowest, and hispanics being above blacks but below whites. It comes into stark contrast. I can't help but notice that blacks seem to be more "Alpha" -- they are better dancers, more athletic, less likely to have 2 left feet.
There is yet to be a civilisation to dominate the world that doesn't maintain the family unit. This is inherently "beta". A family is "beta" to many blacks. I believe it is partly genetic, that blacks are "born with it" An alpha vibe. This is why the black memes posted from twitter are so funny. They'd never be dominated by a woman as easily as whites or asians, but this also predisposes them to a non-family unit style system of single mothers and absent fathers. My reasoning is that this is somewhat genetic because in the hot climates of Africa, less paternal investment was needed by Fathers because the climate was not as harsh as the cold winters of the north and east. So it became a matter of make the most children, rather than strong pair bonding & focusing on one or two children.
>>51119132
Like what is your criteria?
cmon tell me.
>>51119965
>Conflating African American problems to the entire African/African descendant population
Also it seems you are focusing on Black Americans.
>>51120177
I also have experience with blacks down in London and through British TV, and it smacks of the same thing. Which only adds to my argument that it is not entirely cultural.
America happens to host a very large African population so it will appear frequently in observations.
Besides, your comment doesn't actually contain any content: you say I'm conflating American problems with African problems when my entire argument is that they are the same thing.
>>51112291
>Why is the western world sacrificing our own children to the third world muslim horde?
What children?
It's so great the West is dying.
>Just think about how many children have been raped so far and will be raped in the future. I already know about the 7 year old German girl that was brutally raped in that park in Germany by some African.
Makes me even happier.
>>51119422
>Yet, we still have to grapple with egalitarian equalism and the ideologies that stem from it every day (feminism, multiculturalism, etc.)
>Ironically, the ones calling us "ignorant bigots" are actually the ignorant ones themselves.
Do you realize that all that evidence was gathered by Noam Chomsky, right?
>>51121174
And?
>>51117537
>The issue is clearly a cultural one, Rome was gone before it let the immigrants in.
This. Also, the impact of the Migration Period in terms of the ethnic composition of Europe wasn't as huge as it's made out to be. The "peoples" that migrated were for the most part groups of mercenaries and warriors the size of small armies at most, not entire tribes.
>>51120696
>you say I'm conflating American problems with African problems when my entire argument is that they are the same thing.
They aren't in Afirca single parenthood is usually the result of death of 1 parent, war, disease and sometimes abandonment. but in Africa and in Asia+ME extended families are much more common then say Europe or NA.
The reasons for for single parent hood world wide is not uniform or genetic. Like in America they have higher rates of single parenthood for all races and are the top globally.
>>51119422
It wasn't, he's spewing some Mussolini revisionist bullshit because Mussolini didn't like being called inferior by Hitler all the time.
>>51121696
Yeah, I never said it was entirely genetic, just that there is a genetic component to it.
The correlation is too much for me to ignore; I'm not convinced it can be completely explained by culture.
>>51119422
>and even that gender is innate, and primarily not a social construct.
no fucking shit it isn't. how else would you explain david reimer, the guy who had his penis damaged beyond repair during a botched circumcision and so had it removed and lived as a female for a while, always felt uncomfortable and awful, and eventually learned of his origins and transitioned into living as a dude? shit, how would people with genuine gender dysphoria exist if gender wasn't innate?
>>51116957
>Hiring barbs, to stop other barbs. THAT'LL GO WELL.
This is a lesson the British Isles will never forget. amirite, Celtic lads?
>>51122352
Exactly.
There's also plenty of scientific evidence, going back to the '80s.
Yet we are still bombarded with headlines bemoaning the "under representation of women" in field x or y.
Or attacked outright because a man might suggest that adding women into certain male workspaces might change the dynamic of said workspace.
It's like they literally don't understand how men work. They express disbelief when people don't act like gender-netural automatons.
>>51112291
>Just think about how many children have been raped so far and will be raped in the future. I already know about the 7 year old German girl that was brutally raped in that park in Germany by some African.
>Mentions one incident, which ofc was in Germany, GERMANY YES xDDDDDDDDD LOL REDDIT U GUISE
>doesn't mention these
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rochdale_sex_trafficking_gang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derby_sex_gang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oxford_sex_gang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bristol_sex_gang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telford_sex_gang
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peterborough_sex_abuse_case
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rotherham_child_sexual_exploitation_scandal
Typical Anglo scum, I hope you all rot with your Zionist overlords.
>>51122075
The nuclear family you speak of and it's "muh tradition of family values" was an invention of the Industrial Revolution. Every society built heavily around agriculture (like much of Africa and the early history of the United States) had families with multiple children.
Now please bombard me with inaccurate and misleading statistics, I wish to laugh this evening
