So what will happen if ISIS do use these supposed chemical weapons?
Do the countries of the world have some kind of standing agreement that the use of WMDs will result in buttfucking?
>>51010690
Chemical weapons aren't necessarily WMDs. Nerve gases like VX is, mustard "gas"? not so much.
Biohazard of Islam will happen and if the infected persons bite you then you'll go "Allahu Akbar!!"
They lack the infrastructure to launch anything other than gas shells, of which they are using old stock.
>>51010794
Well, the US (World Police) define a WMD as:
"any weapon or device that is intended, or has the capability, to cause death or serious bodily injury to a significant number of people through the release, dissemination, or impact of:
-toxic or poisonous chemicals or their precursors
-a disease organism
-radiation or radioactivity"
If they could get 6 people to kill 100+, they could probably kill quite a few Christmas shoppers with chemical weapons, even more if they're clever and poison the water.
>>51010794
they are
>>51010690
yes, if they do release some agent they will get invade by ground forces for real
>>51010931
Do you think they'd be fool enough? And who do you reckon would get in on it? I'll assume NATO straight away. Any others?
>>51010690
You really think the world works like that and that any politician on this planet cares about chemical weapons or human rights or the so called international law? You are naive.
>>51010904
5 people killed 100+ with suicide vests, does that mean they count as WMD's too?
>>51011024
Yes desu. If people get killed by WMDs, civilians everywhere will be worried that it'll be them next, and will want something done. To shrug your shoulders and say "Oh well, we'll just wait until they kill some of us" would be political suicide.
>>51010961
they won't, it is against their ideology really
there is an opcw that controls the ban and destruction of chemical weapons but there is no security guarantee
>>51011024
invasion of iraq was literally for some chemical weapons, pls even if it was a farce it is still a legit excuse
>>51011113
chemical weapons are internationally defined by convention
>>51011113
>Toxic or poisonous chemical
>A disease organism
>radiation
Nope.
