Post terrible work by otherwise competent artists to boost your confidence and realize that even pros make bad art at times. Pic related by Nathan Fowkes
What are you fucking gay?
>>2584634
Nathan pls
>>2584633
That's how most of his color keys look like. How exactly is it bad? It reads very well from the thumbnail, thus it does its intended job perfectly fine.
>>2584645
Incompetent control over saturation levels, edges all over the place, noodly brushwork and to not speak of the unappealing shapes and drawing of the figures. Yuck! It's irrelevant if it did it's job as a profuction art piece. It's incompetently painted. But that's ok. It serves to remind us that even great artists put out subpar work when under tight deadlines.
>>2584654
post your work
>>2584655
flash me
>shitting on good artists to boost self-esteem
>instead of finding the good things together you reached in your own art
never change /ic/
The proportions of the nose bridge make the eye seem like it's way too deep into her face
>>2584815
Thats stylized.
Why would anyone shit on someone art to feel better? Even if it's awful, at least they tried
>>2584633
it's not bad at all you dumbshit. The thumbnail reads really well, it just needs some refinement...I would probably get rid of the highlights on the left side and tone down the highlights on the kids a little. Minor tweaks in composition like sort of enclosing off the right edge somehow, pushing the shadow background areas darker to pop the main characters forward...tighten up the painting on foreground characters...maybe a little on background...but it's something that's on its way to being a decent piece.
>>2585396
>>2584884
stop shitposting, man up and have some self confidence
>>2584645
>How exactly is it bad?
The cat and the egg look dumb. The whole thing looks phoned in
>day Jim Lee Liefeld anatomy
>obvious photobash is obvious
Hair looks like mud
>>2584654
You have missed the entire point of the image. Good job proud of you keep it up.
>looking for images of failure to supplicate yourself
Absolutely Untermensch.
Never gonna make it
NEVER
EVER
>>2584657
Don't delete me debunk me
Wew /ic/, a literal thread to literally shit on other artists
nice
epik
OP do you have a blog? (serious)
This thread.
>>2584815
Let's see what you can bring to the table monsieur d/ic/k head.
Hiroyuki Imaishi's section in the Art of Panty and Stocking give me a weird sense of hope.
>>2589092
Even though they're not "failures" per se. A failure would mean that he was trying, which he isn't.
>>2589093
>>2589092
>>2589094
he sounds like the Togashi of of production art
>can be really good
>chooses not to be because he's a manchild
>>2584815
>>2585803
>>2585808
>>2585810
>>2585811
If i could draw half as good as these people behind these "bad" artworks, i'd never complain about my skills.
>>2584633
Op, you're a fag.
>>2589100
woah, you must be some type of ass
You're all shit people.
>>2585812
...Fuck the 3rd Game.
