Attempting impressionism, oil on canvas
>>2522408
If you look at impressionist paintings, you'll notice that although they are stylized, the landscapes are still very believable. I think it would help you to do studies of landscape from observation, and then try impressionism again once you're more adept at conveying a realistic scene.
>>2522413
I know, I dIdnt use reference for some reason, thought it would just be a sketch. Also I only had like 2 drops of white
Looks like you painted a background and then dotted lines on it instead of having dotted lines make up the scene
>>2522408
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dk9XruRJPbY
I fixed it up a little bit, is it better?
low effort bullshit
>>2523962
Paint a real landscape instead, the perspective and just believability of this one is bad.
>>2524016
This. You have to really sell the forms and perspective if you're going to do an impressionist painting, or else it just looks like it was painted by a child.
you don't have any idea about impressionism
it would help if you knew what you were doing
>>2524055
this. you're aping post-impressionist styles (van gogh, pointilism), mistaking that for impressionism, and forgoing the plein air approach that these artists use. as a result, it is illastrat-tier shit.
waste of paint/10
>>2522408
Wow, that's quite a nice style... I'd like to see more elements with a less open foreground, but that is simply beautiful anon.
>>2523962
It is better, although I'd recommend using a small white taklon brush for foreground details.
Could you put a row of dancers in the front? Picnic tables?
