ANNOYING AND CRINGY SHIT ARTISTS DO THREAD
- Home
- Board: /ic/ - Artwork/Critique
- Reading: ANNOYING AND CRINGY SHIT ARTISTS DO THREAD
>sign every shitty little sketch
>"DO NOT COPY, TRACE, REPOST, REFERENCE WITHOUT MY PERMISSION"
even though its not even worthy of any of those things
>sameface and samepose
>any shit like pic related
>>2459867
How is this gonna help us to become better artists?
thb OP your post is pretty pathetic
I'm getting kind of sick of people putting such a high standard on signing their art. It's a name in cursive, it's really not that big of a deal. Sure, you're suppose to only sign finished works but who honestly gives a fuck? And why would they?
>>2459867
Mods please clean up this trash.
Usually their signatures look better than their art.
>>2459993
Some artist do that if they feel like their work will get stolen, which is ironic when they keep no-signature versions archived in the first place. Then again, I'm come accross god-tier artist who use the asian 'stamp' signature. So I understand why the typical like OP's look awkward.
