My art?

>>2406331
blog?

I don't have one, I've never though of doing it as only friends and family think they are good enough to sell

Bump?

>>2406331
its bad. anyone whos told you otherwise is a liar.

>>2406331
its good. anyone whos told you otherwise is a liar.

>>2406651
>>2406672
oh you

no offense, but it's not good. Take it to the beginner thread.

It's mediocre, it could use more shading and lighting especially the monicle.

>>2406331
>Hi all, what do you think of my watercolor pencil art?
It's not very good. The handling of the paint looks very poor(something made harder by working on canvas, of all things), and the forms aren't well defined. It looks like it a painting by someone who's relatively inexperienced.
>Also I have been told people would pay for my art, would you pay for it?
No.

>>2406331


You would be surprised what people will pay for, and what art is used in children's books/materials for reference check out Eric Carle, Liza Frank, and even the Louis Wain thread for subject focused art.

My tip to you would be to hone in on foxes or steam punk animals as your primary subject matter, and over time you will improve. Everyone has a different style and subject matter. If you want your art to look more realistic then you really need to focus on perspective for awhile to gauge shapes, shading, softening hard lines, etc. It just requires practice.

>>2406331
A normie with no eye for technical skill and nothing to spend money on would buy that. If you want a wider audience though, you'd need to fix that lighting issue of yours. Read the sticky.

>>2406331
Simply amazing. Brava, Brava!

>>2411450
which is the majority of the populace so he is in luck