Docop's from last thread >>2656672
Post Collages or Requests
>>2660456
>>2660459
>>2660460
>>2660462
>>2660469
>>2660472
>>2660477
>>2660462
Damn yo, I wish I was walking down THAT sidewalk.
>>2660456
These are supposed to be photoshops of normal sized girls not girls like Karlie who are actually that big.
Klossal!
>>2660582
Bigger is better!
>>2660584
Imagine!
This doesn't show up in catalog, why is that?
>>2660460
I find this to be the perfect height. Wonderfully tall, but still able to interact
>>2660682
It shows up fine for me?
>>2660704
Thanks man! I'm working on a similar one, but for Hayley Atwell. Is that anon still here?
>>2660772
Yep, I haven't gone anywhere.
>>2660721
yes, but not when you search for "Giantess", so this is sort of off the books
>>2660782
Rate? (disclaimer: no idea how shadows work)
tfw no Crimean goddess gf
>>2660828
Based Megalover93 strikes again.
>>2660788
wishing the pros would post again :(
>>2660856
Is this the only place you're uploading your works? The name "b3" isn't familiar to me on DeviantArt or anywhere. Would be neat to follow you if you were posting on DA or something.
It's time for SwiftZilla!
>>2660890
Starting from where I left off...
F you capcha
Kim Kardashian is my favorite giantess but damn if Wendy isn't directly behind her
>>2660870
yeah only place, I can't remember my DA pw.
B3 is the imaginary third Banana in Pyjamas FYI
>>2660907
I wonder how many celebrities are aware of the giantess fetish, and perhaps even some of the images of them photoshopped to city size?
... and I wonder how many of them might actually enjoy the idea? I could certainly imagine a Kim Kardashian type liking the idea of so much power and attention.
>>2660907
Kelly Brook for me. Something about her thiccness just works
>>2660917
It's god's way of punishing us, anon.
>>2660922
You know what city this is?
>>2660929
Where do you find bg with perspective like this? It's proving difficult
>>2660929
Unfortunately, no. It's a lucky city though! :P
>>2660931
I usually just use really simple Google search terms. For that one, I would have just used something like "city street" or "above city street" or something like that. Appending things like "from above", "looking down", "from plane" (for a more extreme example), etc, tend to help at times.
Street numbers
How do we all feel about multi-size?
>>2660955
It's alright, but I like it a lot when it comes down to one being so large that they cannot individually pick out normal sized people anymore with another 'smaller' one that can, but is still gargantuan compared normal sized people.
There was a caption one time a long time ago that had multi size and it had the larger one saying "I'm jealous of you. You can actually see the people down there,"
Stacey Poole. Very underused. Put a few of her in that shared not-dropbox thing. Of course, everything I have or anyone are posed sets.
I think this is the place to ask this question.
1-2 years ago I've found a picture on giantesscity, which featured a mega short-haired blonde girl (I think) in a position similar to this one >>2660960 in a top-down view. The image was very high-res with no destruction at all. The girl was completely nude and was leaning over a city with her head barely above the buildings.
Doe anyone here have it?
Posting a few of my favorites to keep the thread alive.
>>2660968
>>2660971
I think I might be getting some recollection of an image or two like that, but I'm not even sure where I'd start looking to try to track it down. Perhaps some "from above" or "giga" tag over on GiantessBooru, though I doubt their tagging system will be of much help ...
Those are some great images you've posted, regardless! Good to see some appropriately sized girls enjoying themselves. :)
>>2660982
>GiantessBooru
Not him, but I think their tagging got completely wiped about a year ago.
Also about GiantessBooru... I'm starting to get extremely pessimistic about that site. A lot of nothing worthwhile will get posted on there, and a lot of what's actually good gets uploaded in a lower resolution than where you can find it anywhere else.
>>2660956
Miley's got great gams. Big fan
>>2660984
Yeah, the "collage" tag got bulk messed with a few years ago, which is why they shut off non-moderator tag editing. For some reason they haven't worked out a way to bulk revert that individual user's edits, or to do a simple find-and-replace for the tag the user changed "collages" to.
At the end of the day, GiantessBooru is a product of who uses it. And the simple fact of the matter is that very few collage artists bother to directly upload any of their content there anymore. So what does find its way there are frequently low resolution/poorly compressed versions of images someone has stumbled upon elsewhere online ... which are frequently poorly tagged.
Buuuut, it's still the best general-purpose, all-in-one giantess gallery the web has to offer. I was hoping that GiantessLove would manage to take its place with enhanced features and greater artist focus ... but it honestly feels like a bit of a mess currently. I really think they need to overhaul how the front page, gallery and user pages/galleries work/interact.
>>2660982
I've tried looking on giantessbooru, but to no success.
>>2660984
Where do you usually get your fix?
>>2661004
I need to say that I'm really glad that people have started to use PornHub to upload their GTS videos. Every once in a while, you get to find something fucking amazing.
http://www.pornhub.com/view_video.php?viewkey=ph568462b3b5a31
>>2661004
>Where do you usually get your fix?
DeviantArt and GiantessCity, which has REALLY slowed down to a crawl recently. Since what's good gets posted mostly on DeviantArt anyway, I'm really only on GiantessCity for Chuckwagon's bi-quarterly-ish image dump.
It's like Christmas morning when I log on and there's been 10+ pictures, and I end up saving a half dozen or so.
>>2661020
And there's been 10+ pictures posted***
>>2661020
Ditto for Chuckwagon's posts. It's always wonderful to see his thread light back up after a few months!
Posting image upload site
https://www.yogile.com/yi7gadt9#41m
>>2661034
I'm currently working on two collages from material posted in here. Hopefully I'll get them done sometime tomorrow.
>>2661051
HYPE
I'd love to know where these non-photoshoot Wendy Fiore source photos are coming from.
>>2660913
I want to say someone like (if not) Katy Perry tweeted a collage someone made of her, but I don't think she made any reference to it as a fetish though. I can't remember if it was her, she was a giantess in that one commercial though. So I want to believe she enjoys it.
>>2660955
I've never really been a fan. I don't mind it though, it just doesn't do anything more for me.
>>2661034
How close are we coming to the limit on this site? Wasn't it something like 100MB?
>>2661109
good gravy....
>>2661167
>How close are we coming to the limit on this site? Wasn't it something like 100MB?
I think so. Not sure how close we are now.
I finally have a use for these
>>2661219
Isn't it 250 images?
>>2661271
300 replies/250 images
>>2661273
Yah. So we good
>>2661271
>>2661273
>>2661274
was talking about >>2661034 not 4chan.
>>2660788
The edges on her are a bit funny in some areas, but it's a good size.
Too much Taylor Swift. Not enough Demi Lovato.
>>2661416
>wanting that greasy spic to be even bigger
found the Vilderama
>>2661416
One is too many
>>2661167
>How close are we coming to the limit on this site? Wasn't it something like 100MB?
I'm not entirely sure how close we are. The website doesn't tell me how close we are to reaching any of the limits. There was a 100MB limit, but I can't remember if that was just the total uploadable file size, or if it was the total traffic allowed. We're at 80 images currently, so maybe there's still a bit of room left.
>So I want to believe she enjoys it.
Katy Perry has tweeted fetish pics before, but yeah, not sure if it's not just supposed to be "look at this funny pic". She seems to have a bit of a silly sense of humour. However, she does appear to be a fan of size themes to some extent - there's a reasonable amount of forced perspective images peppered through her instagram, she's performed with/on a number of giant objects during her stadium performances (microphones, bananas, etc). Nothing definitive ... but I want to believe!
>>2661416
There's no such thing as too much giantess Taylor Swift! But Demi Lovato is a cute too, I'd agree there's not enough giantess content featuring her.
>>2661425
>I'd agree there's not enough giantess content featuring her.
So lets get to work
Love this board, it is where I get the most of my best of my material from. Always nice to see the occasional giantess thread here.
Posting some of my better collages here as well.
>>2661505
>>2661506
>Anna Kendrick
>California being destroyed
Pretty great picture.
>>2661527
I have more although most are older and not quite as good.
>>2661529
>>2661530
Last one for now.
>>2661506
>>2661529
>>2661530
>>2661531
This isn't really my fetish but I like the idea of being sort of cradled in the palm of her hand and carried around. Maybe I would rest in her ear canal if she was big enough, or I could cling to the tiny hairs around her nipples like a friendly louse.
She would be my protector and I would tell her to attack cities I didn't like and also demand tribute in the form of riches and slaves.
>>2661542
This is the dream.
>>2660782
>will cowtitsanon ever notice me?
>>2661505
This is magnificent, there really needs to be more size content of her. Saved >>2661506 from last thread also.
>>2661552
Not that anon but hnnng
>>2661556
:3
So you want more Marina, and have also realised you could do with more Anna K. Any other outstanding requests?
>>2661415
Yeah, masking is tough for me. I mostly do it manually and get lazy. Thanks though
>you will never ever have a super computer than can make perfect quality giant wimmin pictures as fast as you can say "Give me 25 10000x10000 images of ______"
I've had dreams of this
>>2661666
I always wonder how upskirt situations would work in a "real" giantess scenario. It probably depends mostly on the girl, but I imagine they might be a little too preoccupied with other things other than what a few tiny people under her might be able to see. After all, women typically don't need to worry about what might be seen up their skirt from below when they're just standing around on the sidewalk ... unless it's windy.
If her clothes didn't grow with her, of course her first response would probably be the typical "I'm futilely trying to cover myself with just my arms/hands" pose. But if her clothes grew with her, maybe it's not something she'd think about straight away.
What I'm really trying to say is - "giantess upskirts are nice".
>>2661670
Yes please, I want that computer too. Especially if it worked on any girl, not just celebrities. Extra points if it does video too.
That, or a fully functioning size ray. I'm not being picky.
Closed the tab and forgot I was dumping
I don't really like pictures like this where she kind of just fades into the horizon. Hard to describe. Really only saved it because it was Agnetis.
Kinda in relation to >>2661682, where does everyone draw their line at "too big"?
I'm not really sure personally, though I know I don't like those "cosmic" sort of images where the giantess is happily floating in the vacuum of space while looking at a tiny eyeball-sized Earth. Seems to push it a little too far for me.
>>2661751
>where does everyone draw their line at "too big"?
Too big for interaction is a big no-no for me.
Personally, 300 feet is where I draw the line.
I wish I had this fetish.
>>2661556
I agree with more Marina. Unfortunately there are also so many other girls that deserve content too.
Like Victoria Justice.
>>2661793
Another Victoria Justice
>>2661751
Once all possibility for any sort of interaction is gone, that's too big. To put an actual size on it I'd say...small country sized? Basically when cities cease to even look like cities, even when they're on all fours and closer. Then it just becomes a woman standing on a flat ground with a blue background. Ever read 70 Mile Jenny? That's about my limit. Maybe a tad smaller. Good story by the way, wish it was longer.
I'm with you on the cosmic stuff. I loathe it.
I can't explain why I like Anna Kendrick huge. The rest of my giantessable women are mostly all superficial celebrities and page 3 models
>>2661799
I agree Anna Kendrick makes an excellent giantess. I need to make some more of her as well.
I always start thinking of strange shit while looking at a giantess picture like, "How long would it take her to cross the Atlantic Ocean at this size?" or "Is she big enough to drink out of the ocean and not even notice that she's sucking up all kinds of sea creatures and junk?"
Some stories actually articulate all of this pretty well...before they're all abandoned with no ending.
>>2661622
Well I request Aubrey Plaza more often than anyone else, but I've never seen Lizzy Caplan made into a giantess, and that's just criminal. I posted some pictures in that yogile account (which I may post more in, needs more Plaza).
>>2661671
>What I'm really trying to say is - "giantess upskirts are nice".
Absolutely, despite the dangerous position you have to be in to see them. Depending on her size you may never be able to outrun a step she takes, and that's not taking into account her noticing someone taking a peek up her skirt. Of course I assume this a risk most of us are willing to take.
>That, or a fully functioning size ray. I'm not being picky.
I've wanted a shrink ray (with which to shrink myself) longer than I can remember, before even formalizing the idea that I might have a fetish for this sort of thing.
The first and only Alexandra Daddario giantess just got posted.
>>2661551
>I want my midget-giantess to take me around as she sneaks around hiding from the city eaters
That sounds nice, I could work with that :^)
>>2661551
>the world thought they were threatened when the 400ft tall woman appeared
>...then the 4000ft tall women appeared
>"This Summer"
>Starring [Your Two Favorite Giant Women]"
>>2661777
I mean, honestly, I think it's possible to develop fetishes through simple exposure. I started off with a purely SW fetish, but my love of giantesses grew naturally through exposure (a lot of popular SW websites are tacked onto giantess websites).
If you really "want" this fetish ... just hang around some more. Find some pics of your favourite models/celebrities/etc as giantesses, things like that.
>>2661795
I actually only read 70 Mile Jenny fairly recently. It was quite good, the author did a good job with that size than I've seen previously. I guess that's why it's one of the classics.
>>2661799
I agree, she's certainly a prime giantess candidate.
It's strange that I feel like there's a whole range of different celebrity personalities that I feel like would suit giantess stature very well. Maybe it's post hoc though, I might just be retroactively trying to assign some "good for giantess personality" when the actual reason is just "she's cute and I'd like to see her bigger!!" Hard to judge. :P
>>2661885
Aubrey Plaza sure is a cutie, but I bounce a lot between whether I want to make collages of her or not. I'm not sure why, sometimes I think she'd be a great giantess, other times I'm totally meh. Anyway, pic related, a collage from 6 months or so ago. Not one I'm hugely proud of though.
>Absolutely, despite the dangerous position you have to be in to see them.
I usually just imagine that she's so huge that it's (almost) impossible to not get a flash or two. Especially with such a short skirt!
>>2661937
She's really a prime candidate for giantessing in my mind. Not sure why I haven't gotten around to doing more with her!
>>2660456
you typed the title in the wrong topic field, but otherwise good job
>>2662128
sowwy man. I tried to make up for it by making new collages... but I do those wrong too :(
taylor step on me now
>>2661795
>>2662102
>70 Mile Jenny
People write erotica of this? I guess I shouldn't be surprised. I write a lot of fapfiction and was sort of daydreaming ideas for a story about a very big girl.
>>2662228
there is a great story on GC called Dominican Dominance, a shame it'll seemingly never be finished
>>2661885
Maybe it is just me, but Aubrey Plaza is a great name for a giantess. It sounds like a place, a big place.
Ariana Grande is the same way, she has a name that implies bigness. I think it improves the fantasy just a little bit.
Ariana Grande is the same way, the name implies bigness.
Anyway here is a new picture of Aubrey Plaza, trying to fit into a Plaza.I have been wanting to do something with her for a while, glad I finally finished it.
>>2662268
Karlie Klossal is the same way! :P
Also, duddeee, you've been doing a great job churning these collages out! You're making us slow pokes look bad! :P
>>2661937
This is one of mine, I try to make giantesses out of models I don't see often, such as Marina Diamandis, Brenda Song, and apparently Alexandra Daddario.
>>2662275
Most of them I have already done, they are on my Deviantart page, intershrinker. They have been on a few of the pics here.
>>2662283
Oh, my bad, I assumed you were the same B3 anon from earlier! Still, the two you've produced in the last day or so are beating me out!
I'll be uploading my Hayley Atwell collage later tonight. It's basically already done, but I have to duck out for a bit before I can add the finishing touches.
>>2662102
>I'm not sure why, sometimes I think she'd be a great giantess, other times I'm totally meh.
I can see what you mean. I think it's just that I fell in love with her in Parks and Recreation. But it can't be denied the cold nature she had in the show wouldn't lend well to one of a giantess.
>>2662268
And I'm glad you finished it, too! I've had the same thought regarding names. I actually posted some Grande in that Yogile collection. Not even a fan, I think she makes for a great giantess. Anyway, thanks again, this is awesome.
>>2662300
yo dats me. Looking forward to more Hayley :)
I'm working on some more, some from requests on here. I know I'm junk, but thankfully that website is super useful for easy photos to use
>>2662311
This artist is fantastic and i don't think I've seen them posted much.
>>2662442
Quiet thread. What, are you guys at work?
>>2662492
>>2662492
We've all been captured by a giantess and are trapped in her clothing.
Don't bother trying to rescue us! :D
>>2662494
For a board named hr it's pretty dumb to have an 8mb file limit
>>2662497
Living the dream broseph.
>>2662500
>>2662501
>>2662502
That's my dump over for now.
>>2662499
Used IG to add more jpegs. Hope it was worth it
>>2662300
Better late than never - here's my Hayley Atwell collage. Hopefully the scale is more in line with what that anon was after.
>>2662504
This collage is a total hnnnng for me.
>>2662510
Ahh, that's the stuff. I don't know if you're Hayley anon, or that's another guy. But hfs nice blending!
>That "you've been a naughty little anon" face
Here's a real quicky using the Taylor Swift bikini pic posted in the yogile. Despite it being super quick, I'm actually really happy with how it turned out!
Pls Taylor - make a giantess video clip!
>>2662667
Damn! So nice. I was about to attempt the same but it's good to let the talented do their thang
>>2662492
Yes desu
>>2662667
Yes. YES. YES!!!!!
>>2662825
Can someone do a collage using either of these images?
>>2662826
Ooh maybe, though i'm inclined to leave it to someone good. Also, I've been collecting lots of good backdrops, is there a separate Yogile for them?
![the_height_of_summer_by_analternateusername-d7zoif6 [www.imagesplitter.net].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/72GZD77.jpg "the height of summer by analternateusername-d7zoif6 [www.imagesplitter.net]")
![giga_emma_watson_by_zitukx-d6xbhqy [www.imagesplitter.net].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/kJcou2v.jpg "giga emma watson by zitukx-d6xbhqy [www.imagesplitter.net]"){kind=small}
>>2662830
I would like this very much. Someone should make one if one doesn't exist.
>>2662850
Nearly done
>>2662826
>>2662850
Others did exist of course. But I had to help ya out pal
>>2662862
Thanks, I envy your skills
>>2662872
I know pastebins are finnicky, but here included is some backgrounds:
http://pastebin.com/Hf82nLwe
>>2662876
https://www.yogile.com/eoy03rn6
I made one that we can upload to I think. I have never used this site before.
>>2662888
good, yup. The free accounts have heaps of limits so more is good. We should add that to the pastebin for new threads.
>>2662895
Updated pastebin:
http://pastebin.com/xgK83M22
Has the links to a few communal resources.
We should post these to start threads.
Not enough of the bird as a Goddess.
>>2662924
I'm confused. Are you requesting a giantess collage of her or did you select the wrong image?
>>2662510
She looks great, thanks for doing this!
>>2662800
How about Bigdick McGee? :^)
Heh, I actually just remembered that my username in the size community (docop) actually originates from these /hr/ giantess threads from years ago. The "op" part was because I made some of the threads, so people were referring to me as OP.
>>2662817
I hope that's her attitude after growth too. ;)
>>2662862
Nice job! And timely too, I really envy people who are able to work so quickly!
Have you considered making a new account on DeviantART for your work? It would just be a shame if they were to get lost in these threads alone.
>>2662993
No problemo!
>>2663019
I'll get around to it, for sure. oh so you're docop! Big fan, as you can tell by the op.
>>2663019
I hope you don't mind my asking but; what made you decide to start doing collages and the such?
>>2663082
Maybe he works in a corporate high rise, office with a view... of the steel monstrosities across the street. Wishing a gargantuan nymph would reach in and snatch him away from the hum drum and into a life of magic, excitement and adventure.
Inb4
>projecting this hard
>>2663055
Thanks for the kind words. :3
>>2663082
Literally these threads on /hr/. We had semi-regular /hr/ giantess threads like 4/5 years ago. I was already a size fan at the time, and had a tiny bit of experience messing around in Photoshop. The threads were going slow, and I had a bit of free time, so I thought I might try to make a collage or two and maybe try to do some requests with /hr/ material.
A few days after I had started, I made my deviantART account so I had somewhere to upload them after the thread died ... and the rest is history!
>>2663124
Heh, I wish I had such a giantess-inspiring view at work.
>>2663172
wow, I am sort of your protégé then, since I'm at that stage. History repeating
>>2663184
We /giantess bros/ now.
>>2663187
I'm letting go of two collages that I've been trying too long to get right and perfect. Here's one.
>>2663232
And this one... doesn't make sense. I'll try to do more mega scale since that's what the people want
>>2663232
Neat! The perspective really adds to it!
>>2663234
A sudden growth spurt just as she stepped through the door? This was certainly one of my fantasies at high school. ;)
>>2663270
I love how the hair drapes over the buildings. So good.
Also doc, what's your process? Does the image start in your head, or do you work from a photo backwards sort of?
>>2663397
It's usually pretty straight forward and boring really. I just find a nice image of a woman I want to work with, then spend some time searching for a good background with matching lighting/perspective. Details like destruction extent/position is then just born out of the layout of the background image.
I kinda wonder whether this is really the "best" way to go about things though. I feel as if, in this way, the concept is fit around the image. But it would be nice if the opposite were true - if I had some predetermined concept/scenario, then endeavored to recreate it as best I could. I guess that would make the visual storytelling of a collage much more compelling, rather than just being "big girl superimposed on background".
Buuut, maybe I'm just being a pretentious douche nozzle here. I'm just super envious of artists like AnAlternateUsername who just seem to be able to effortlessly create cinematic looking giantess content that ooze story to me. I'm a fanboy. c:
Another collage using material from the yogile.
>>2663019
>I hope that's her attitude after growth too ;)
>tfw docop thinks the same depraved thoughts as me
Hit the max on Yogile, tried to upload 4 images but only 3 went through.
>>2663581
Is pic related a bit of a better size for you? Maybe still a tad on the larger side.
>>2663636
Are there any giantess fans who would hope that wouldn't be her attitude? :P
>>2663654
Haha, her last name is Poole? Really? I'm glad I didn't choose to 'shop her into an ocean scene!
>>2663717
That's a shame. I guess nobody knows of any good (free!) alternative to Yogile we could use? Still, lots of good unused material in there.
>>2663792
>I'm glad I didn't choose to 'shop her into an ocean scene!
If she's big enough, then the ocean is like a... well, I'm not going to make a bad pun
>>2663799
The size community subsists on bad puns. It's just the way of things. c:
>>2663581
Muy hombre. Four storey bitches is where it's at
>>2663184
Time is a flat circle....
MOAR NUDES LESS CLOTHES!!!!!
>>2663442
Yeah for sure. And this is art - it's okay to be pretentious :)
>>2663792
Hnnng. I'm not that anon who requested, but good chit
>>2663946
Do you prefer to imagine that a giantess simply outgrows her clothes? Or do you prefer to imagine that her clothes grow with her ... only for her to then discard them?
I like the idea of giant underwear being hung over the top of skyscrapers.
>>2663989
Hidable in what sense? The giantess isn't so large that people can still escape from her and hole up somewhere safe? Or the giantess is small enough that she can go find someplace to hide (she's not immediately visible to everyone in the city)?
>>2664016
The latter - a 200m+ giantess will have trouble hiding amongst high rises, let alone trees. Not that they'd care, just another class
>>2664055
A 200+m giantess could just hide AS a skyscraper.
>"Why does this elevator look suspiciously like a pair of panties dangling between the legs of a giant woman?"
>"Must just be some new modern art style of architecture. Hurry up, jump on, I want to get to our hotel room!"
>"This is a weird elevator mechanism, it looks like two giant hands just reached down to hoist the elevator back up ... OH GOD!"
Hue hue hue
>>2664016
>Do you prefer to imagine that a giantess simply outgrows her clothes? Or do you prefer to imagine that her clothes grow with her ... only for her to then discard them?
I've had this dumb story idea that the clothes grow also, including jewelry, etc...ends up being a group of people that try to steal and sell the tons of gold or what have you once the giantess leaves (hopefully).
>>2664145
I like it. Very Hans Andersen .
>>2663554
Man, if her feet weren't submerged in the source image, I could totally see this used for a Dubai collage with her looking down at the Burj Khalifa between her legs.
I'd call it "Sandcastle?"
>>2664145
That's a neat idea for a story, especially if the giantess later decides that she wants the jewelry back and goes to track down the thief. Maybe she would hold several cities at ransom until the jewelry (and thief!) was delivered to her. Destruction abounds!
It would also be fun if the giantess wasn't very big at all - us sneaky macrophiles would surely do our best to bundle her socks, underwear, etc, into the back of our cars for later use as blankets or sleeping bags. :P
>>2664164
Would have been a nice perspective, if we could have found a good matching background image.
Seriously, the Burj Khalifa is just asking to be giantess'd.
No replies in over 12 hours. Has everyone been captured by a giantess again?
>>2664699
Was about to ask. Anyone got something in the oven, or should we just post DA rips?
>>2664709
I've got an image or two from the yogile that I started doodling with yesterday. I'm a little busy at the moment, so I might not get around to them for a day or two, but I'm still at it.
>>2664714
Legend :) I was trying to make one of those in camera "look, I'm a giant!" photos into a shoop, but got frustrated
>>2664718
Do you wanna post up some screenshots of what you were doing and which parts frustrated you? Maybe we can give some tips?
>>2664719
didn't get that far. Here are a couple of random forced perspective stuff I grabbed to show you what I mean.
I sort of couldn't see what more could be done, with my limited skillset anyway.
Fresh from DA
>>2664733
Forced perspective stuff is super nice, especially because it's a somewhat common novelty for groups of friends to do while out and about. I've logged on to Facebook a few times to see some of my female friends posting these kinds of images of themselves. Fun!
>>2664735
I have such a crush (hue) on Sophie Turner as a giantess. Based Wonderslug!
I've just downloaded the latest version of GIMP and have spent a little bit of time playing around with it. I'm finding it better than I remember, and I actually prefer a lot of its keyboard shortcuts and navigation functionality better than Photoshop.
Later this week I might record a simple little video tutorial using GIMP to replicate my Taylor Swift collage from a few days ago (>>2662667).
>>2662667
>tfw no behemoth Taytay gf
>>2664782
Well, if it makes you feel any better, at least you'll be healthier without such a girlfriend. I can't imagine that any of giantess Taylor Swift's boyfriends would have a very long life expectancy ...
>>2664757
Ah! That'd be awesome, seeing as I've never learnt I know it won't be in depth but just see it in action. Also, the magician reveals his tricks?
This shit is interesting to me. Someone needs to make a movie about fuckin giant ass women appearing in cities all over the world, and how the brave fetishists of 4chan bring an end to the destruction... or continue it...
>>2664817
The Taylor Swift collage is pretty simple luckily, so there's not much in the way of "advanced" techniques to show. And even then, the advanced techniques aren't really so difficult, they're just really fiddly and frustrating. :P
I won't narrate it, but I'll throw some simple text over the screen to explain what I'm doing and why. Should work pretty well, I hope!
I don't really get the artists who want to keep their process secret. At the end of the day, I'm a giantess fan first, content producer second. I want to see other people making giantess content! Everybody wins!
>>2664848
I don't think anyone here would want to try to end that destruction. ;)
So does anyone have any fun giantess/size scenarios in mind that they'd like to describe? Maybe write a little story about? I like the idea of trying to create collages to fit to a story/scenario, and maybe you guys have some fun ideas?
>>2664214
>Seriously, the Burj Khalifa is just asking to be giantess'd.
Truly the best measuring stick
>>2664901
Until the next "tallest building in the world" is completed. ;)
>>2664887
I'm actually exploring making a little narrative tryptich or series of collages. The ones with Tay, Klossus, and Karen Gillan are a bit like that already.
But back to what you're asking, I'd love to write one! Tomorrow?
>>2664912
Neato, I'll keep an eye out!
>>2664887
I can probably be more creative and descriptive later on today or so, and could definitely think of more. I really like the unaware or indifferent personality currently, relating specifically to Wendy Fiore and Agnetis (I wish it was easier to get a working torrent for more of her sets). For example, I see Wendy being indifferent as she just plops mile and a half tall self down on Central Park and looks around at the city, thinking thinks like "none of these people matter, look at these little helicopter toys buzzing about, etc". She might reach out and snatch up a building and inspect it before either nonchalantly crushing it in her hand of just letting it slide off.
Now Agnetis -- I always imaging her as absolutely unaware, and about two miles tall, minimum. I see her lazily walking through, lets say the western United States, maybe looking down once. She finally decides to take a load off and slowly starts to lean down. One of her knees completely obliterates part of a mountain range and neighborhood or two. She starts to let herself down even more and the local militia starts firing things at her belly that darkens the sky. No result of course, unnoticed. Then come the massive meteorites called her breasts. As they contact with most of the city, they create shockwaves that knock people off their feet for miles. Finally her head makes contact, destroying the remainder of the city, and she lazily falls asleep.
Ran out of room.
>>2664923
Reposting Agnetis for reference.
>>2664915
Are you expecting something in the same vein as 70 mile Jenny, or are small giantesses ok too?
>>2664923
On a much more simply put idea. I like the thought of multiple giantesses play fighting by throwing buildings, and vehicles at each other.
>>2664923
Fun ideas. I really like the image of a huge giantess lowering her stomach/chest over the countryside as she goes to lay down, and for there to be a massive military volley against her at the time.
>>2664933
Anything at all really, go nuts!
>>2664936
Heh, nice idea! It's rare to see this sort of thing in collages with multiple giantesses.
>>2664936
those explosions are not well done
>>2665197
No they are not but I try to look past that.
>>2665197
I think most people are admiring those titanic titties rather than the explosions
>>2665197
>>2665202
>>2665248
>>2665253
The question of appeal in relation to the scenario used vs. quality of collage is one that interests me a bit. Especially here on 4chan, a lot of people say they hate collages simply because the average quality among the community isn't great. For my own interest, I ran a simple little poll to get some idea for what people find most important in a collage:
http://docop.deviantart.com/journal/poll/5320567/
Interestingly, the quality of the collage is seemingly the least important thing for most people. The scenario being depicted and the choice of the woman are more important (50% and 30% respectively).
It's a very simplistic poll - naturally all three factors will play some intertwined roll for everyone, there are undoubtedly times where a FANTASTIC scenario is ruined by MS paint level collaging, and so forth. But if nothing else, maybe it suggests to us collagers that we should be putting relatively more effort into making sure we're doing something interesting, not just something of pixel-perfect quality? Of course, if you can do both at the same time ... :D
Maybe I'm just pointlessly rambling again. c:
>>2665630
I agree that one must not lose what we shall refer to henceforth as the "heart" or the desire that the image is evoking. ;)
>>2665771
these are really interesting to compare their approach with the posters here or on DA
>>2665794
The huge advantage of a lot of studio shoots is that they have access to the model so the can pose her against pre-selected background images with the correct lighting. This is a HUGE advantage. I've seen a few behind-the-scenes videos from studio photoshoots where they have monitors with overlay images so they can perfectly line the poses up to their desired backdrops. I want.
I can't recall any examples of any collagers in the giantess community doing this. The few who have hired models never seem to bother to collect background images to match against (nor do they usually have much flexibility over lighting anyway), and it's not clear that those who shoot their own background images have any specific model images/poses in mind. The later is certainly the most practical for most of us, though very few seem to bother.
For pretty much all collagers in our community, the quality of the woman/background match is simply down to how long we want to slog through a Google image search.
As for >>2665771's image specifically, it's not the greatest example of a photographer having access to the model to match to a background. Her positioning isn't very great (for her to fit into the background image they had to have her awkwardly popping out of the trees at a height where her feet wouldn't even touch the ground), the lighting does't match at all (she's being lit from the front AND from the side), the woman's shadow on the building isn't super fantastic (seemingly a few passes with a soft brush in multiply mode), and the perspective looks a little bit off (might just be me anomaly hunting at this point though). I remember when this ad campaign first hit, there were a few threads in various design subreddits making fun of the (relatively) shoddy work.
But, hey, it's still nice, I don't mean to be needlessly critical. I certainly like the composition and pose.
Again, I'm just pointlessly rambling. c:
>>2665814
Exactly, yeah. The one that stood out to me was the other female Anchorman poster with a spinning helicopter rotor blade effect that looked like something I gave up on.
One thing to note is that those people who request photogs to get models to do poses get ground level wide angle shots which are really rare on Google - not perfect, but an edge.
Speaking of, anyone good at maths? I'm trying to derive an equation for focal length, subject distance, scale and all that, the thinking being that it'll take some of the guesswork out.
>>2665822
The first reply to the same sort of question here seems to be what you're looking for:
http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/12434/how-do-i-calculate-the-distance-of-an-object-in-a-photo
distance to object [mm] = (focal length [mm] * object height [mm] * image height [pixels]) / (object height [pixels] * sensor height [mm])
>... the thinking being that it'll take some of the guesswork out.
I guess the key word here is "some" of the guesswork. At the end of the day, you'll still need to do a bit of estimation for the distances and heights, depending on how you're planning on using it.
>>2665860
For a little bit of fun, I thought I might test this out. I used this image: >>2663442
I did a reverse image search to find the original image, which was taken in Perth, Australia. I used Google Maps to calculate the distance between the camera and the woman (~935m), and I took a look at the image details to find the camera (Olympus FE-110, which has a 4.3mm sensor height) and focal length (6.2mm). Maggie's height in the image is about 1400 pixels, and the image itself is 1920 pixels in height.
Throwing that all in, we find a height of about 473 metres. Those two buildings just to the left of her right leg (her right, our left) are about 110m tall, which is a good sanity check that the calculation looks correct.
So, yay maths. It's the Attack of the Half-Kilometer Maggie!
>>2665914
Also, an extra note, this all depends on the information stored within the image file being accurate. For example, I tried to use the same method on pic related, but it total failed (the calculation put her height at about the same as the real world height of that small black building in front of her, ~100m). I suspect it's because the camera details stored in the file referred to the image of the woman, not the image of the city (the focal length was recorded at 50mm, but with the distortion around the edges, it should have been much smaller).
>>2665860
that's a respectable pair of tits
>>2665947
She could ... *cough cough* ... COME IN LIKE A WREEECCKKKIIINGGG BALLLLLL!
I'll show myself out.
>>2665949
Please do, and never leave Reddit again.
>>2665822
Are you referring to this one?
>>2666085
Issues of lighting and perspective aside ... how is she even managing to stand on those buildings like that?
>>2666106
I'm totally on board!
>>2665914
You're kidding... wow , the burj khalifa most be huge if it's twice her height
Guys I've been working on a bunch of really quick collages and watching Lynda tutorials. Haven't got anything to show for it and the tutes were a bit basic but I have one nearly ready. Is anyone posting new stuff?
>>2666129
Indeed ... looks like she's still got some growing to do! :P
>>2666395
Nothing new from me at the very moment. I'll probably jump back on the wagon closer to the weekend.
>>2666423
Ah yes, the "free time" as opposed to the time stolen from the work I was supposed to be doing...
Anyway
>>2666471
Nice job! Your skills are increasing pretty quickly!
This is the sort of thing that would encourage me to watch more sports! Giantess cheerleaders might be nice at these sorts of events to. :P
Surely we're not dead yet, are we?
>>2667036
Never! Unless that's a caption for that photo, in which case "soon to be"
Daisy Ridley really got 'big' in Hollywood after Star Wars
>>2667180
I love the shade on her leg - like she's standing in a miniature city..
Looks like we've hit bump limit again! I'll start a new thread later today once this one falls closer towards the last page, unless someone beats me to it.
>>2667180
I've been wanting to do a giantess pic of Daisy Ridley for aggeeessss, but for some reason I've just never been able to find a source image of her that I really liked to collage. My watch shall continue.
>>2667403
New thread guys! Hop on board!
