File: Peru Military Service.jpg (1 MB, 5424x3049) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 5424x3049

Op failing megabytes not Kilobytes

File: Apollo 16.png (5 MB, 2700x1520) Image search: [Google]

5 MB, 2700x1520

>>2527279
> This Guy
Filesize does correlate with quality/resolution, but you forget format.

A High quality JPEG might be 1MB, but the equivalent lossless PNG would probably be ~4MB.

Observe. Here's the original PNG

File: Apollo 16.jpg (1 MB, 2700x1520) Image search: [Google]

1 MB, 2700x1520

>>2527899 (You)
Now try and spot any difference (there is almost none, I needed program to detect any), and notice the filesize difference.

Your argument is invalid. And in addition, You're barely over 1MB, by the same amount OP's barely under. There's another 1023MB to go if you're going to boast about megabytes.

>>2527279
see
>>2527883 511 KB, 1710x2565

>>2527884 1.9 MB, 1970x1205

and then shut the fuck up.

File: Villa_romana_bikini_girls.jpg (4 MB, 4227x2747) Image search: [Google]

4 MB, 4227x2747

so it's png or pong (jpg) image size against resolution and not the celebrity thread