Astronautics
- Home
- Board: /hr/ - High Resolution
- Reading: Astronautics
Let's have a good space/astronautics thread. In this thread : vehicles, stations, engines, modules, launchers, equipment, astronauts, etc. everything related to space exploration.
any burgan?
>>2465651
I can't believe that these Rails are not perfectly made. I mean, you can build and buy rockets and dont build or buy an even railway?
>>2467595
I just realized that they probably were even and perfectly alined, they just were in use for quite a long time..
STS-134 EVA4 Space Shuttle Endeavour.jpg
>>2474015
Exterior of Cupola
>>2474023
>>2474026
>>2474037
>>2474054
I have some more but I'll try to post them later.
Good post OP
>Almost none of the spacewalk pictures still hae the background radiation artifacts left in
>pic related
>>2483264
R.I.P, those guys died a death no one on this earth deserves ;_;7
>>2474039
everything about that craft is impressive
all I got
>>2486472
>Almost none of the spacewalk pictures still hae the background radiation artifacts left in
Do they remove them ?
>>2468794
The three astronauts in that picture would be dead a few years later
might as well post the link to the spaceflight photo package lol
>>2467598
Rails expand and contract with temperature change https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Buckling#Surface_materials
>>2497599
I assume that's the red spot on Jupiter? It looks like cream just added to coffee
>>2508486
Yes. The photo was taken by Voyager I circa january 1979.
>>2464647
I got you. What do you want to see?
>>2517039
Salyut Programme!
>>2474033
Space shuttle had a lot of flaws, no argument there. But damn if it didn't look cool.
>>2517039
Lets have some of Vostok and Voskhod, those two don't get enough coverage.
>>2517039
Everything !!!!!!!
>>2517372
A lot of Salyut is too low-res for /hr/ but I'll post what I can
>>2517605
>>2517508
>>2517616
>>2517617
>>2517619
>>2517620
>>2517624
>>2517625
The early Soviet stuff is hard to find in decent resoultions
>>2517632
something more hi-tech
>>2517709
and yet nobody ever duplicated it. I wonder why? Are trash cans not in plenty?
>>2517764
You can't be that stupid.
The lack of detail while in super focus
proves it's a small object close up.
Detail focus proves a great deal about an objects size.
If the scratches, imperfections and details are only huge, then it's a small object.
>>2517521
I'll post some highlights/favorites
>>2517806
>>2517814
>>2517778
You would do well to search for Analysis of the Wedding cake UFO by Rhal Zahi and read it. Maybe you'll understand afterwards. Maybe.
epic thread
>>2507002
lol
Does anyone have a good collection of spacesuits/flight suits?
>>2522071
amazing... open the thread even i can see anon's all ready posted loads... it be nicer if you showed us yours collection that is
>>2483264
This picture always blows my mind; given how crisp and clean the image looks, and that there's nothing to immediately date it (aside from the identities of the men and the Apollo 1 patches) makes it look like it could have been taken last week. Shit's crazy.
>>2508486
It's due to gases being fluid, though not a liquid. Under the correct circumstances, they behave the same., such as turbulance in liquids or gases.
>>2487406
anyone have info on where this is?
>>2518389
What an amazing piece of technology.
>>2517039
Boeing Defense (or commercial), Orbital Cygnus, or Lockheed Martin satellites in integration or packaging stages would be cool.
don't die on me
>>2527429
I'll start with Boeing's X-37B unmanned spaceplane.
>>2529545
>>2529555
>>2529561
These are from the most recent X-37B launch in May of 2015. That vehicle is still in orbit now.
>>2529612
And now some of Boeing's CST-100 Starliner
>>2529708
>>2529713
>>2529715
>>2529717
>>2529718
>>2529720
>>2529726
>>2529727
>>2529729
>>2529740
>>2529743
Thanks so much!
