So Zac Efron gets naked in his new film
>webm related
>one hand
I'm so glad his career went in the direction it did
>>1277636
his dick is taped, you can see it.
I'm sick of him thinking he's attractive.
>I know you want to see me naked
I don't.
>>1277646
How can you see it if it's taped down?
>manlet
![B-U4qsqIUAAx3vA[1].jpg](https://i.imgur.com/hhicFvL.jpg "B-U4qsqIUAAx3vA[1].jpg")
>>1277595
I have no interest in his micropenis at all
he is aging shitty
his best days are behind him
>eyes too close together
>>1277662
>confirmed micropenis
His pecs are weirdly small.
>>1277595
If it fit's in one hand he can keep it
Y'all love to make a big deal out of anything. Jesus!
>aging shitty
Doesn't make sense.
>penis taped down
What the fuck you are on about?
>One hand
Dear sassy bitchy flamboyant monster cock-hungry faggots, you can conceal a penis with just one hand. Plus he wasn't even nude. Get your lust and mind checked. Also stop being so degenarate.
>>1277663
That was confirmed a while ago
>>1277735
All these jealous bitter turbosluts rofl sempai-tachi
>>1277595
>Zac Efron gets naked
>>1277751
oops, wrong pic
>>1277754
>shoops this bad
10/10 he could shit down my throat and I wouldn't even put up a fight
>>1277595
I don''t care how much he strips. Nothing tops this.
>>1277660
Micropenis or no, he's aging like a fine brandy.
>>1277788
forget efron give me franco
>>1277822
why not both?
>>1277824
The patrician answer
This is real, right?
>>1277860
No.
>>1277595
Unfortunately not. As someone posted (there are more pics out there), you can clearly see he is wearing his own white briefs, on top of that the nude briefs. What you see in the movie is CGI effect. Even the scene with the motorcycle, its not him naked, its a stunt double. Still a good visual.
>>1277860
Close! This is the real image.
>>1277968
>>1277595
>>1277968
>>1277974
>>1277683
...Mrs. Brown?
>all those virgin uglies who think a normal dick is a micropenis because the BBC porn wrecked their representation of reality
I suggest you step in a collective bathroom at your local gym, you might learn a lot about how human bodies look like
>>1277984
shhhhhhhhhh let the bitter queens have their delusions
>>1277984
Lol! Why bother? Anything under 5 inches and small in grith is "micropenis" in their heads. I bet half of these faggots are sad virgins with a massive "standard" and fantasy. The other half probably glory hole hiv drinkers.
To them every man must walk on earth with limpy erection the way it was on gay porn casting, if not then it's micropenis.
Bunch of forever alone fappers.
>"Average penis doesn't exist! Only huge and micro!"-Professor Faggot Extremeus
>>1278089
>Anything under 5 inches and small in grith is "micropenis"
it is tho
>>1278103
Honey, please. A simple googling can show and tell you what size is really considered as micropenis.
>>1278103
It's not micro, but anything under 5 is pretty disappointing and a lot harder to have fun with.
>>1277683
More than a handful is a pain in the arse
>>1278112
Anything under 7 is a waste of penis
>Size queens
>2015
If there's a faster way to identify someone as a frustrated virgin I haven't found it
>>1277733
Having a small dick when soft means shit all about how big he is when he's hard
>>1278348
Project much? Liking big dicks isn't outdated.
ITT: salty fags w/ small dicks
>>1277660
Said by a basement dweller, most like it.
It's so disappointing that size queen-ery is only a phenomenon among Internet virgin porn-cucks. Just imagine if the world were filled with gorgeous lonely gays with lovely normal-sized penises that nobody wanted and you could have them all for yourself.
Super large dicks are disgusting, I'd rather have one smaller than average than some throbbing monstrosity. And the rest of the body is so so so much more important than the dick size.
>>1278548
>It's so disappointing that size queen-ery is only a phenomenon among Internet virgin porn-cucks.
I'm lost as to where you get this idea from, but truth be told, "size queen-ery" has been around since the 60's. Possibly even longer but that's going beyond my time. Not that it makes it any less silly.
>>1278549
Dude fucking cave paintings show that even fucking cave men exagerated penis sizes, and the Egyptians pretty much never let a mural go by without a gigantic dick appearing every few feet.
Size queenery is intrinsic to the human mind. Particularly the male mind, actually. Even straight guys are flaggerbasted by big dicks
At least this argument is different from the 'are you a pedo?' one I've been seeing everywhere else on this board lately.
>>1278564
Seriously how hard is it to accept its movie magic! People claiming its his dick, that it was a rehearsal which explains the pics of efron in the nude briefs. That for the actual scene he got naked.
This is the rehearsal shot.
>>1278564
>>1279484
This is the actual scene for the movie being filmed.
>>1278564
>>1279484
>>1279485
See its movie magic! Its CGI which is why he wears the nude briefs, its easier to manipulate in production. No that is not Efrons actual penis! If anything its his bulge (nude briefs) in that GIF or actually meant to be his penis with the CGI trickery.
>>1279484
>>1279485
>>1279486
Zac Efron + his own tighty whities + nude colored briefs on top + CGI = Naked Zac Efron
>>1279487
To think they would go this far for a nude scene, i guess Hollywood people really are retarded scums. Much more easier for them to just hire a body double or book any actor who is willing to nude and comes equipped with applaudable acting skill instead. Why waste time hiring him (or any actor who won't do nude) and shoot a nude scene? Ridiculous. I couldn't care less about him or his acting skill and star ranking---he has none. Is he even a thing? Lol!
>>1280183
Says the man who lives in his basement and never gets out
pretty sure they couldn't have him running around with his dick flapping about while there's a minor there isn't that indecent exposure or something? get a clue like
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ZhyhOXHrAc
Yup, most dudes doing nude scenes wear a thong or a dick sock that gets either covered or CGI'd out. Note the g-string here on Chris Evans.
>>1280244
Speak for yourself, attention-seeking dog. Don't tryna reel me up as someone who lives the same sad life as you.
>>1280252
Minor(s)+Adults+Nudity= Nothing new in Hollywood. Besides, Hollywood rarely makes full frontal (for male nudity scenes, at least). So if they used cgi in this scene just to make him nude, it is really sad.
>>1278554
This is somewhat incorrect. The Greeks and Romans found large dicks disgusting and embarrassing.
>>1280271
Is it weird that I find Chris Evans in a g-string hotter than him being just naked?
>>1280271
I don't know why but I thought about Eric Christian Olsen getting naked for Fired Up!.
ITT fags caring about flaccid penis size like it matters
>>1278548
sorry about your tiny dick
>implying you wouldn't fuck him
You guys are a bunch of whiney faggot. He's out of every single one of your league and you know it.
>>1280982
Well, it is hollywoooooood after all. Cgi dept got nothing better to do, i guess.
>>1285595
What the hell is this?
>>1286065
Neighbors 2
>>1277660
I'd have to kinda agree with you anon. His elf like youthful face is gone. Hid body seems to have dried up and its way hairy. Dude needs to shave. I mean hes Zac efron for gods sakes
>>1287495
He is jewish. What did you expect? Product of years of inbreeding. Lol!
>>1287495
>and its way hairy. Dude needs to shave. I mean hes Zac efron for gods sakes
This shit taste
>>1289212
Lol! I guess Zac means something to him.
