catholic england

Then James 2nd and Charles would have ruled England quicker

Skip Anglicanism and go straight to Lutheranism, because they don't want to pay indulgences - which are basically taxes - to Rome, or even jumping on the Geneva bandwagon.

Puritans end in America regardless.

The only question is how much less frequently would the Brits kill one another.

Sir Thomas more banned protestant books. So the heresy of Lutheranism would not take on hold in england. England would remain catholic, new england would be catholic.

>>978619
>because they don't want to pay indulgences - which are basically taxes - to Rome
>Indulgences
don't you mean tithes?

File: image.jpg (565KB, 800x818px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

565KB, 800x818px

>>978619
>indulgences
>taxes
Get thee behind me Satan

>>978707
>>978978
That's how Luther's sponsors viewed them anyway.

The Brits would have followed their example.

That's incorrect. There was no major clerical corruption problem in england like what was present in continental Europe. England did not truly become Protestant until Elizabeth came to power and protestant anti catholic propaganda gave rise to Puritanism.

File: 1460315742118.png (575KB, 720x402px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

575KB, 720x402px

>>978619
>Didn't want to pay indulgences

>muh fayth alone
>muh scripture alone
>I'm my own religion
>whore of Babylon
>muh pope is Antichrist

>>979057
It's the reason the nobles in Germany protected Martin "the Pope does well" Luther and ultimately converted to Lutheranism.