Is it safe to say that "Europe" as an entity was born with the rise of Charlemagne?
Only Christcucks who can't reconcile the FACT that Europe thrived the most when Christianity didn't exist and only recovered when Christianity was neutered by the enlightment claim that.
>>922295
No. Europe as an entity was born with the remarkable successes of Pepin the short
>>922302
>Pepin
>>922300
Europe was shit pre-christianity and post enlightenment
>>922658
>Europe was shit post enlightenment
wew
>Europe before Christianity
A backwater shithole, filled with naked barbarians getting their asses kicked by Rome.
Civilizations were centered around the Levant, North-Africa and the medittereanian.
>Europe after Christianity
Number 1. Conqueror and colonizer of the world. Traditions, family values, morals and ethics.
>Europe after "enlightenment"
Liberalism, atheism, monkey-myths, socialism, communism, marxism, nihilism, cancer
>>922676
It's objective fact
Cry harder reddit
>>922300
Even if that's true it don't mean themre was a european entity. The romans loathed the European Germans and loved the semitic Egyptians as an example.
>>922693
objectively better in terms of what?
Aside from piety, what did post-classical, pre-englightenment Europe have that was so great?
>>922295
Nope.jpg
Europe was born in the 1700's.
In Charlie Maynes time it was pretty much "Christendom" and "Barbarians/Pagans/Whatnot." Charlie didn't give a hsit about no European identity. Whole of Medieval history didn't.
>>922691
Didn't the majority of Europe's world colonization occur after the beginning of the Enlightenment?
Didn't those naked Barbarians have plenty of traditions and family values?
Wasn't Song dynasty China more technologically innovative and economically prosperous than their European counterparts?
Weren't the Mongols the military powerhouse of the world during the 13th and 14thcenturies?
>>922295
Isn't that the warlord who forced mass conversions by butchering germanics/scandis who didn't want to convert?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capitulatio_de_partibus_Saxoniae
The faggot is literally no different than ISIS.
>>922691
I can't even tell if this is a troll
>>922729
No to all four
>>922295
His name is Charles the great
>>922708
They werent pussy moralist prudish twats
Europe was born in the 17-18 century, when we built the idea of continents.
Europe never was and still isn't an entity.
You're probably thinking of the West, and the answer is no.
>>922295
The concept of Europe existing as a identity dates back to the Greeks.
>>922735
>Unironically comparing a historical figure from over 1000 years ago to someone similar now.
You know, I don't remember Charlemagne planning attacking on Muslims throughout the middle east like what ISIS is doing to Europe.
>>925192
Because planning attacks on innocent Saxons are no problem at all right
Howdy
Gold is a very valuable commodity.
>>922832
No, I'm pretty sure that was the period that was the most moralistic and puritanical.
>>925192
He no airplanes.
>>928810
*had
>>922735
>>927883
>>928849
Well Christianity is a sandnigger religion, why cuck yourself to a foreign religion?
That image is rad though, I'm saving it whether you like it or not.
>>928887
Why cuck yourself with any religion?
It's like people want to lick the feet of a sky spook.
Nothing is safe to say they are always watching
>>922691
t. John Hamburgman
>>925192
Nah, he just attacked the Muslims close by in Spain.
>>922295
No
>>922302
>Pepin the short
MANLET
A
N
L
E
T
>>928887
Place of origin is irrelevant in the face of the truth
And Christianity is the universal faith
The concept of Europe was born with the Roman empire.
Only the most idiotic contrarian would deny that.
Even today nearly all of the modern European countries retain the names Rome gave them as provinces.
Also Charlemagne a shit.
He was an illiterate warlord that tried to ape the Byzantine Empire and failed.
>>930487
>The concept of Europe was born with the Roman empire.
That's completely stupid. Rome united the Mediterranean, not Europe.
>>928849
Skyrim is based tho
>>930352
>>922321
>>930352
It's "Pépin le Bref" --- Pepin the Brief. The surname was added two centuries after his death, --- earlier sources only name him "Pippinus piissimus" --- Pépin le Pieux, Pepin the Pious.
The "Pépin the Brief" surname most likely comes from a misunderstanding, in Medieval Latin, of the word "Brevis", which here would have been used to mean "Pepin Junior" by opposition to Pepin the First, his grandfather. On the other hand, "Brevis" was also used to qualify his grandfather, before moving down to him.
The mistake seems to have taken hold around the 12th century.
The Greeks were the first to define the Aegean as the border between Europe and Asia. The Romans and Byzantines carried on this idea.
>>922704
And? It's not as though during the middle ages you didn't have people who'd side with Arabs and Moors over other Europeans.
Cultural, religious, etc allegiances always fade away when there's more to be gained by allying with the other side.
>>922658
>not wanting to go to Plato lectures
>>930526
Yeah I feel a connection to my pagan ancestors when playing it.
HAIL TALOS, SKYRIM BELONGS TO THE NORDS
>>930487
>Even today nearly all of the modern European countries retain the names Rome gave them as provinces.
That's so wrong. The only ones I can think of are Italy, Spain, Germany and Belgium. And Germans don't even use that name.
