Wait so explain to me why a consequentialist approach to the nature of will is untenable? Im having a lot of difficulty understanding this position and its obverse. Could someone help me?
>>914741
no one wants to write your philosophy paper friend
>>914741
because the tenable nature of the will can only be attainable within a consequential framework of reasoning that observes and presupposes its fundamental discourse within the parliamentary functions of our forms of sensibility.