Does evolutionary history count as history?
>>908886
Sure, I guess, it's anthropology right?
>mfw paranthrapoids
I would consider it biology and/or archeology, since early human evolution predates recorded history, therefore making it difficult to study history beyond theorizing when and how evolutionary advancements occurred.
>>908886
me bottom right
NO HISTORY IS PER DEFINITION FROM WRITTEN RECORDS UNTIL NOW SO HISTORY BEGINS ~5K BC IN MESOPOTAMIA WHERE WRITING IS FIRST DISCOVERED PRE-HISTORY IS EVERYTHING BEFORE THAT
>>908886
Well since biology gets bullied off /sci/ I'd be kinda happy to see these sort of threads here
>>909891
Why is it bullied away form /sci/ though? :(
>>909589
Sure, but the sticky also says anthropology and at least in large swaths of Universities in the US bioanthropology's under that header, which includes primatology and the evolutionary biology of hominids.
>>909891
Yeah it's nice it's just a shame there's little chatter these days save taxonomic autism, which I guess needs hammered out to do anything else of merit but goddamn.
>>908886
>we'll probably never clone other species of humans back in my lifetime
Bump for interest
History begins with the founding of the first civilization. The Polish–Lithuanian Commonwealth
No, for it to be history it specifically has to have written sources. It's archaeology and anthropology
