Have we solved the Problem of Universals?

>>898174
Are there universals at all?

When someone says "horse", like all words it's subjective to context. A certain society might decide zebra are included in the category, but ours doesn't. So there is no universal of horse, there are only linguistic/cultural norms.

I still don't get the problem of universals.

>>898196
The universal word is "huh."

http://www.smithsonianmag.com/science-nature/everybody-almost-every-language-says-huh-huh-180949822/?no-ist