How did nazis justified killing jews?
>they started it
>>725629
With screencaps of reddit.
Most Germans didn't even know about it.
>>725629
>[the current year]
and
>Jews are very problematic
>>725641
>this meme
wew lad
>>725653
but it's true besides you think people would support wasting resources on barbaric ''we are speshul and they are not letz kill em xD'' shit?
They didn't. They never publicly acknowledged the concentration camps.
>inb4 some nazboo says "B-BUT MUH JOOISH BANKERS"
Yeah a couple of Jews running a bank isn't an excuse to fuck over every other every other Jew, especially the doctors or veterans
>>725663
>wasting resources
That they were not human, they deserved it, and revenge.
>>725629
hitler would actually be pretty handsome without that shitty mustache
>>725869
He looks worse without it m8.
Historical Facts
>>725869
>>726128
holy shit that's creepy
>>726128
Hello there.
>>725629
>pls take them
>seriously, we don't want them
>What do you mean you don't want them either? We are the Nazis here.
>Just send them to Madagascar or Palestine ffs.
>Jesus Christ, now our allies send their Jews to us too!
>What do you think we do with them?
>So far, half of our train net is transporting fucking jews from one place in the Reich to another instead of doing something useful!
>They don't want to leave on their own! Those fuckers are more patriotic than the SA!
>We annexed Austria and now we're full, m8s.
>The OKW does not have the resources to put up with all these untermenschen
>You know what? I'll just ask Heydrich. He will come up with something.
>Maybe we need the guy with the trucks again...
One Wannsee Conference and the de facto nullification of 6 years of Nuremberg laws later
>Hey Eichmann! Rev up those engines, we got work for you.
>>725629
Why would they need to justify something they didn't do?
The Jewish supported a communist revolution in germany which killed thousands of civilians and crippled the german economy.
>reasoning
theft
>public acceptance
Jews were not seen as members of society because they rebelled earlier. Germany was in a tough economic situation.
It's normal in war-time situations to intern enemy populations. Germans saw Jews as enemies, not without reason, considering they portray the Eastern Front as an anti-communist crusade, and that Jews were notoriously for collaborating with communists even to massacre peaceful Poles and Belarusians.
>>727065
Pls elaborate, senpai
>>726999
Exactly. Jews were put in concentration camps to work. Why would the Germans gas millions of free labor workers in war time? The logistics of killing and cremating that many bodies doesn't add up either
>>727082
I've got some pics on it
>>725629
Antisemitism was enormous across all of Europe. WW2 wasn't fought for the kikes, that was retconned into it. Europeans saw no need to justify killing jews because across the board, the governments of Europe did not like the jews. It was only a question of severity.
>>727098
this one basically repeats the same shib
They just didn't like them very much.
>>725761
>They never publicly acknowledged the concentration camps.
You have to remember, they never privately acknowledged them, either. All these years and not one official document, just "eye-witness" accounts.
>>727126
>"eye-witness" reports
>>727139
Oy vey, bad goyim. Shut it down.
>>727126
This one always cracks me up
Sticky of evidence for the holocaust when?
We've had threads with copious sources demonstrating it.
>>727176
>We've had threads with copious sources demonstrating it.
Post it then.
>>727126
why do you lie on the internet?
>>727101
10/10 of the German communists were German
Checkmate wehrboos
>>725629
How much blood would you trade to rebuild your nation and bring it from abject poverty into unprecedented greatness?
How much blood did it cost to spread Hellenism across the East?
How much blood was paid to give the world civilization under the vigilance of Rome?
Greatness is always bought and paid for in blood.
>>727292
>Greatness is always bought and paid for in blood.
Ow the edge,
Anyway, Mongs killed a lot of people. They made an empire but all people like to remember was how fucking barbaric they are. Grandeur is something mainstream history does not associate the Mongols with.
>>727226
Source? Didn't think so. Also, the Nuremberg documents were proven forgeries, even by the Allies.
>>727176
I agree with you, actually. I mean, obviously the Holocaust didn't happen, but since no one will believe me anyhow, it kind of did. It's the same thing as 9/11: so ridiculous, so preposterous that only a fool could believe it. The only problem is this fool has put hundreds of hours into researching both, and it only keeps getting more flagrant as I research more.
You see, they aren't dumb. All of the "sane" people are the ones with jobs who have never researched anything. They just take whatever guy the media deems as an expert at his word instead. All true researchers end up at the same place, if they are gathering their evidence correctly. The only places with mass confusion are the prepackaged alternative media figures, like Alex Jones.
Believe it or not, everyone you see with over 50,000 views on every video is there because they are permitted to be so. YouTube is owned by Google. There are no legitimate people who "slip through the cracks." Easily consumable content that is both engaging and accurate is de facto banned in Europe and America. Alex Jones will stay on the air, but some nobody, who gets a little too close to the truth and starts getting views, will get shut down for "hate speech."
This is how the Holocaust and similar events are covered up. The actual evidence isn't; just the easily consumable portions. There is no way to know for certain that the Holocaust is a lie, other than to take a few months to research it deeply. Even then you will never be able to share your information, so it is only one person who ends up knowing the truth. This is the big secret: the truth absolutely 100% does not just come out; there needs to be an organizational vehicle behind the truth, of which none are allowed. We are crazy, but only in the consensus, not in reality.
>>727341
Not that guy but trade over the Silk Road trade routes ramped up massively while during the Mongol empire, which is pretty serious as that trade is what broadened European perceptual horizons.
>>727421
I am getting quite sick of this mentality. I keep running into it where nobody won't directly answer a question. These unknown forces that these people keep talking about are not this f****** powerful. Tell me the truth right now at where in the f****** dead of night talking over the Internet no who could possibly be listening.
>>727296
Thanks for this dude it was a good read. I am definitely going to get the books listed here.
>>727534
>These unknown forces that these people keep talking about are not this f****** powerful.
Naive. Power begets power. A powerful group controlling a nation is not at all uncommon. Think of a monarchy, for example.
>Tell me the truth right now at where in the f****** dead of night talking over the Internet no who could possibly be listening.
They don't listen, they data mine; there is a difference. All internet trafficking is centralized in a couple of buildings in all countries. All traffic is mined, and your data can be called up at any time. Basically, the need for actual personnel to spy is gone.
>I keep running into it where nobody won't directly answer a question.
Here's the simple truth: the gassings were lies, just like many other claims of atrocities were in the past. It is common during war time to produce propaganda accusing your enemy of heinous crimes. The Soviet Union accused the Nazis of gassing, but they also accused them of turning Jews into lampshades and soap, as well. The gassings weren't any more true than the soap or lampshades. It became too much of a boon to the Jews for them to stop the lie, and it also suppressed nationalist tendencies, which often tend to question Jewish influence.
>>727568
>Here's the simple truth: the gassings were lies
>>727296
I like how they dump sources but don't green text any of the contents. I wonder what that would work in reverse? It's in there, guys, start looking, everything I said is true.
>>727571
Too many. The primary one being a complete lack of evidence. Second, the fact that there has been a concentrated effort to impede scientific examinations of the site that could easily clarify whether they happened or not. I guess they are afraid of another Leuchter report.
Germany was for Germans. The Jews were foreigners in Germany, they had no ties to the land. They were said to be parasites, jumping from host to host.
Germany was suffering because of the debts of WW1 placed upon the nation, the Jews were portrayed as being part of this, sucking the German's wealth, making it weak. When Hitler and co said this rabbis made comments and Jews were outraged. Some Jews called for boycotts and in return Germany decided to boycott them, this hurt the Jews more than the Germans so as the Jews made themselves into victims.
Then there were ideologies that were promoted by other Jews, such as Marxism which became an enemy. So by the time the war kicked off it was basically 6 degrees of separation, with Jewishness being the end goal.
>>727296
Yeah, I just went through it. There was no argument, just source dumping. If someone dumped sources stating the opposite, would they have won? Is that how this works?
>>725629
Don't need to justify something that never happened m8
>>725629
REICH, I'M FUHRER
>>727583
>I guess they are afraid of another Leuchter report.
Why would anyone be afraid of debunked pseudoscience?
>>727585
>Germany was suffering because of the debts of WW1 placed upon the nation
You mean the reparations which were cancelled before Hitler came to power?
>>727583
>Too many
>Can't name one
>>727610
Nobody named one thing in the thread linked other than eye-witness accounts. You are saying what can be submitted without evidence, can be rejected without evidence, but there was never any evidence in the first place, so it's the official story that should be dismissed. If they want it taken seriously, stop impeding soil testing.
>this whole thread
Man I bet in most countries where Holocaust denial(mine included) is illegal people just got tired of putting up with all this bullshit
>>727607
>You don't get to bring the Jews
>>727598
so the screening, collecting and sorting of sources is not part of the historical process. i understand
>>727575
im sorry the information is not condensed into a jpeg with about 3 statements, im really am.
>>727970
Tbh, having restricted free speech isn't a plus. I'd rather have holocaust deniers than no ability to deny it.
>>727139
muh 5 million
>>727479
Its my my point: greatness is more than just killing people.
If the mongs actually left a lot of civil projects, great ideas, and the like rather than just consequential benefits of their conquests (i.e. nobody is fighting now, because we killed a lot of them) then they would be remembered as a great empire.
Instead, no, they're treated as barbarians despite achievements.
If all the resources, men and money used to power the holocaust were instead used for the actual war effort would they have had a better outcome?
>>728131
Probably not, because the whole war was David vs Goliath, but Goliath had a twin, and they both had friends.
>>728142
So all these people who say "Germany would have been fine if they did X" are just faggots?
>>728146
Yeah, WW2 was unwinnable as soon as Russia and the US got involved. So they're most definitely faggots.
>>725629
Stab in the back. While Germans were dying in the front Jew commies were agitating and subverting the war effort. Also Jews were not targeted for extermination did you fall for the "Holocaust" meme?
>>728158
why is jeff goldblum stabbing ryan gosling in the back?
>>728158
>>728163
>>727098
>Austrian immigrant prevented foreign domination of Germany
>>725629
The plan was to use degenerates (jews, homosexuals, gypsies, retards, etc) as slave labor, to help the war effort.
Only when they began to lose ground did they decide to kill them, to remove evidence of slave labor being used.
So they "justified killing jews" as trying to cover up the crime of using slavery.
Every other answer is wrong. Hide all other posts and only read this one. It is the only factual post in the thread.
>>727970
They actually ban holocaust denial in those countries to counter rising neo-nazi movements. Of course, those neo-nazis use it as "proof" that "DA JOOZ ARE COVERING IT UP"
>>727609
Person A: You owe me 1,000,000 dollars
Person B: I'll destroy my finances to get you this amount of money
Person A: It's ok you gave me 900,000 dollars that's enough
Person B: Good thing this 900,000 dollar loss did not in anyway effect me going into the future.
>>725629
they didn't know
my grandfather was a member of the SS
>>728839
Your implication is that person B acted in good faith by wrecking its economy in a genuine attempt to pay person A, and that person B had given person A 90 % of the debt owed.
Neither of which apply in the slightest to Germany, seeing as their economic problems were caused by their own overspending in the war and the sabotage of their own economy in order to hit back at France economically - in fact, after cooler heads had finally prevailed, Germany experienced economic stability and growth while paying reparations - and also the amount that was actually paid by Germany was about fifteen percent of the number outlined by the treaty.
>>727098
I think this is missing the point that all those jews were german and white
>>727999
It was all eyewitness accounts. No one posted a shred of proof. It was literally, 'I posted more websites than you, I win,' the thread. Quantity does not make quality, and no one even discussed the sources, just dumped them.
>>728005
Cogent points can and should be highlighted when making your own argument. 'It happened and the proof is in this 10,000 word document' is not proof, and certainly wouldn't fly in reverse. If I dumped the Leuchter report, you would just say it was a pseudoscientific test.
Basically, all of your arguments are appeals to authority at their base. If it was actually about evidence, you wouldn't be so positive. If it was actually about a fair trial, there would have been a mistrial based on the lies and inconsistencies at Nuremberg—like Jew soap and lampshades. That was not a legal trial, and there was no evidence, period. It was a banning of National Socialism, nothing more.
You are a sheep. If Hitler won, you sure as hell wouldn't be saying anything about a Holocaust. You don't have the perspective to understand this, but all of your ideas derive from what is socially acceptable or not. You aren't the rationalist that picks an argument apart, but rather the one without the guts to say something verboten. It has nothing to do with rational content and you don't think for yourself. If you did, you would realize that many things we are told are not only a little fraudulent, but outright lies from the ground up. It is easy for you to say, 'yeah, that evil Communism, right, look how much they lied to the people,' but it is impossible for you to look at yourself and your own government in the same light.
Man I wonder how it'll be like when it comes out clean that the holocaust never happened. In a 100 years from now, someone will be looking at these posts reading how a group of brave sexually frustrated neckbeards stood up to lies ZOG propagated throughout the world behind their keyboards like the warriors they are, and how a shitload of testimonies, evidence, etc. was all just forgery and these were the only people to realize it, that it wasn't until some weird-ass time-travel camera was deviced that people could check out nazi germany and see that nothing of the like ever happened.
>>729375
Man, I wonder how long it will take for historians to figure out our government lied about near everything, just like every other government before it.
>Rome was corrupt and lied=obviously the case.
>America is corrupt and lies=conspiracy nut.
Go to bed. "Conspiracy theories" are the only study that people get stupider in rather than smarter. If I didn't have a job and played video games all day, people would think I was amazing at video games. This logic somehow doesn't hold when it comes to studying anything controversial. The more facts and inconsistencies you point out, the dumber you get!
Also, the Jews really do run this country, and Europe.
https://thezog.wordpress.com/
Check it out. There is no "theorizing" going on here, just cold hard truth. Yes, it's a little outdated, and some of the links are dead, but the point still stands. They aren't the most powerful group in America because I say so, but rather because they are numerically dominant in all important fields. No other minority has ever come close to this level of power, and it certainly implies nepotism and conspiracy.
>>729615
The point is, I can't even convince people of things easily provable, such as demographics. You people can't even count, so why would I think you are capable of a complex debate on the Holocaust with many different connection?
You are fucking stupid if you haven't figured it out yet. The Jews DO own America and it is easily proven to anyone who isn't blind. I've put the cart before the horse. Learn to count and then we can debate the Holocaust.
>>725629
It's 1943, i mean come on.
>>729293
if you are this person
>>727222
and then dismiss the "sources" - sources you could have read in the archived thread or discussed in this thread - by saying they are just sources in this post
>>727598
then specifying that they are just eyewitness accounts after my remark im confused.
by skimming the archived thread i also see a speech by himmler, some links to reports (which may mainly compile eyewitness accounts of course) and a videolink about the
soil around treblinka im not familiar with.
this is by itself not an argument, ive barely made an effort, though i appears to be more effort than youve made this time.
dismissing sources/accounts/reports by saying theres too much of them or that they arent "summarized" sufficiently is no argument either.
i will say now, that i havent read the leuchter report. leuchter appears to be a man who lied about having an expertise he did not have. im not an engineer, but i dont claim to be; why would that make me trust him?
certainly,i didnt make any arguments yet,ive merely used sophistry. it appears to me, that just because something is verboten doesnt mean its true.what in particular is prohibited though?
the rest of your post is you expressing intellectual superiority and braveneess, including a very sharp analysis of my intentions and positions.
im impressed and wish you all the best with your cause.
>>725629
Culmination of over a thousand years of European anti semitism
>>730037
Just to expand on this, i find it very hypocritical for people to look back on germans as being solely responsible for holocaust, or as being the only people that were capable of doing such things. Europeans had an intense hatred of jews since medieval times. They were frequently harassed and killed and banned from certain countries for centuries. A lot of people from across europe actually didn't care about the holocaust when it was first discovered because everyone hated jews. A lot of europeans would probably have supported the idea of the holocaust as well, its just that germany was the first and only country to make an organized effort to kill jews
>>730118
Prosecuted, not persecuted
>>728182
This and only this. They burned the evidence of their crime.
