Does nature have rules?
Yes, energy cannot be created or destroyed
>>676347
Define rules?
Take this to /sci/ where you'll get answers slightly more informed than this
>>676352
Yeah – this is what nature planned
>>676347
Firstly, >>>/sci/
But the short answer is yes. What exactly did you think the laws of physics were? Now there might be some contention on defining the laws at the very, VERY nitty-gritty level that I won't get into here, but broadly speaking there are definitely "rules" to how matter and energy work.
>inb4 everything is perception therefore the only rules are what we perceive to be rules
>>676352
lololololololololol
/his/ is a joke
ITT we write a rule of nature
you can't have two different fruits in a smoothie unless they're opposite charges
>>676347
>asking this shit to liberal arts majors
>>676347
Of course. God created them btw.
>>676347
NO CHOICE
OUT HERE ONLY THE STRONG SURVIVE
The only rule in nature that matters is that the weak should fear the strong
Being tracked by a starving beast
Looking for its daily feast
A predator on the verge of death
Close to its last breath
Getting close to its last breath
RULES OF NATURE
And they run when the sun comes up
With their lives on the line
(Alive)
For a while
(No choice)
Gotta follow the laws of the wild
(Alive)
With their lives on the line
(No choice)
Out here only the strong survive
What’s done is done
Survived to see another day
The game of life
The hunter and the agile prey
No guarantee
Which of them will succeed
Strong or weak
>>679542
>tfw a virus is stronger than you.
>>679542
>should
>implying it ought to be that way
I'm spooked
>>676352
You mean nature is lazy.
