Post old maps
The less accurate the better
What's so bad about accuracy?
>>594503
I find the wonky ones more interesting, gives insight into how the landscape was based on personal perception in lieu of accurate charting
But all are interesting
>>594515
I like them but it's sometimes nearly impossible to get your bearings on some of the old ones.
This map, for example.
>>594517
What the fuck is wrong with Yugoslavia? France, Greece, the Soviet Union and the Benelux should not look like that either.
Yep, that's really inaccurate.
I've got some
>>594531
just realised most of them are above the 4mb limit
Kingdom of Hungary (1632)
>>594539
I have no idea what this is
>>594546
"A Korean map from the 1800s, entitled "Map of Heaven and Earth" (乾坤圖)"
>>594549
Wow, that is incredibly shitty. Though I appreciate it's an advert or something similar, obviously not used for navigation.
Religion in Austria - Hungary (1881)
>>594535
I have the same problem.
>>594549
>You will never settle America
an entire continent unspoiled.. just imagine. fug
>Constantinople is Europe's feet
Sounds about right
>>594508
Does that map have Florida as an island?
I wonder how they got that idea.
>>595027
>Southern Greece is a weird tumor
accurate.
>>596547
That's Cuba you dummy dumb dumbz.
Florida is still shown as a peninsula.
>>596547
That is obviously Cuba.
>>594508
I have that as my wallpaper
>>594554
You would think they could at least give better detail of their own place in the world.
>>594498
> the better
>>596593
It does say so one the map, yes.
The Matthew Paris map of Scotland c1250.
The point where the rivers (the Forth and Clyde) is Stirling Bridge. Interestingly, "Scotia" only refers to the area north of the bridge.
>>597234
And, even better, Scotland according to the works of Ptolemy.
>>596598
Do flat-earthers with this kind of image not understand basic geometry?
>>597249
How do you even get this impression? I doubt any Roman expeditionary could claim they got past the Firth of Forth by going directly east.
