If nuclear bombs didn't exist, would Soviet Union try to do world domination and form Socialist World Republic?
>>573486
>Accusing anyone but the Americans, who actually did try world domination through nuclear threats, of world domination
>>573486
Probably not, or at least not going much further than wishful thinking about it.
The "West", i.e. U.S., UK, France, and other aligned countries had way more population and industrial weight behind them than the Soviets did. If nukes never existed, what you'd see is a much larger western military presence in Europe and other areas that they thought the USSR might try to muscle in on.
>>573486
The existence of nuclear bomb has nothing to do with the stalinist theory of "socialism in only one country", which has been formulated by Stalin in 1924. The orders of the Komintern to its sections outside of USSR always aimed since Stalin took power to deter revolutionnary impulses around the world.
If, if, if, if, and if.
What's up with these what-if/alt history threads lately?
>>573892
What if napoleon won?
>>573892
If those threads didn't exist, would /his/ be better ?
