Is this the only Nietzschean superman in history?
No, he was the only true Nietzschean superman.
That would be Rasputin.
>>533038
Not at all. When Nietzsche spoke of the Übermensch he though of Alcibiades, Caesar, Cesare Borgia and Napoléon.
Any drug lord is a Nietzschean Übermensch. Specially if they don't get caught.
>tfw was Nietzschean before Nietzsche
>>533113
That's cesare borgia
>>533128
He probably means that borgia isn't the ONLY uber driver
>>533061
With a cock like that
>>533128
No, it's obviously Jesus (I'm joking). In fact I was saying he isn't the sole Übermensch according to Nietzsche. Just as >>533133 points out.
No, he wasn't a superman at all. He was the definitive man of his times. A superman is not a man of his times, he is a man of the future who destroys his own laws to make room for the new laws. Napoleon and Mohammed were supermen. Hitler, if he had been successful, would have been a superman.
This guy was definitely one for a time >>533061
I think the only non-violent superman in history is Jesus Christ, but he seldom gets mention as one.
>>533534
You might also think that perhaps Lenin qualifies, but he does not, he did not create the values he imposed, Marx did.
>>533113
He also thought Goethe was Ubermensch.
>>533061
>cucked by Mussolini: the author
>>533584
>implying it wasn't the opposite
It was his influence that turned Mussolini from a confused socialist into a macho fascist
>>533598
yes I am implying it. Mussolini never was a confused socialist.
Everything D'Annunzio desired, Mussolini achieved.
>>533564
I can see that. I guess he had some kind of renaissance man in my mind which Goethe certainly was (not from someone being active in the time period but in a polymath kind of way, I'm sure you get it).
