Who is the West's greatest philosopher? Who is the West's next great philosopher?
>>506146
me tbqh
>>506155
What's your treatise called?
>>506146
>Who is the West's greatest philosopher?
Richard Dawkins.
>Who is the West's next great philosopher?
Do i look like a fucking crystal ball to you?
>>506146
>Who is the West's greatest philosopher?
Kierkegaard
>Who is the West's next great philosopher?
Pic related
>>506166
That is not a picture of me.
>>506146
>The guy on the stairs is waving to the viewer
Never noticed that before.
>>506171
>not based Scooby
Heraclitus
Nietzsche
>>506192
This guy is a legitimate moron. I'm even on "his side" most of the times but he's a fucking retard.
Aristotle
Hegel
Going on sheer influence.
Plato
Johnny Culagazzi
Max
any other answer is a spook tbqh
>>506264
Be careful not to make him into a spook.
Jaden Smith
>>506248
Sorry I misread the question. I have no idea for the second.
>>506146
Thomas Aquinas and the next great will be Edward Feser who will have the honour of restoring scholastic theology to its rightful place/
>>506146
Why does a philosopher have to be a person? one person coming up with ideas is hard, a group of people discussing ideas is a much easier way to pick the best values.
Now if only there was a place on the internet where that could happen
>>506422
>a group of people discussing ideas is a much easier way to pick the best values.
Why?
>>506422
A person philosophizing is a philosopher. Several people philosophizing are philosophers.
Plural, noun and adjective aren't hard concepts anon.
>>506311
>a 1968 born associate professor is the second greatest western philosopher in history.
I understand you are a christfag but for fucks sake control your bias a little.
>>506146
Aristotle
Marx
Me
My property
>>506146
>Who is the West's next great philosopher?
I reckon it will be some chump on Youtube
>>506488
I never really liked the reddit layout
4chan is better because no one is above anyone else, it's just ideas
>>506171
the school of breathing through your balls
>>506488
>>506311
Too bad they were both completely BTFO by Hume
>>506926
I don't see how Hume's argument dismantles argument from contingency. I also don't see how is argument against miracles is anything more than begging the question.
>>506938
>argument from contingency
You don't even need Hume for this, because proposing God as the reason for existence doesn't actually explain anything. It's a complete non-explanation
