Why haven't you read this yet.
Because there are more relevant books than the fedora bible.
>>462062
Cos /his is full if religitards. Even more so than /b
>>462069
Darwin was a Christian
>>462062
Because it's wildly outdated.
We all understand the thesis because it's pretty much ingrained, and deeper research has already improved on the formula.
because it's boring
>>462070
From what I've seen generally /his/ is full of people who are interested in theological discourse but are hounded by /pol/ tier shitposters and militant fedoras.
>>462099
Except it is wildly outdated.
It's just a basic concept, Darwin was wrong about genetics being a mean of sums; rather than a spectrum.
Go circle jerk around The God Delusion faggot.
I've read the original, written over 1000 years before Darwin.
it's on my reading list
still struggling through the Iliad in Norwegian
>>462069
>bible
Then what would you say to an atheist who hasn't read the foundational work of their belief system?
They aren't really atheists?
>>462189
It's like you honestly don't even know what you're talking about...
>>462207
I am responding to an anon who doesn't know what he's talking about.
So it's not the fedora bible, then?
>>462189
Atheism is not a belief system. It's actually the opposite.
>>462142
>"predators eat prey"
>we wuz evolution and sheeit
>>462212
I see what you're saying now. I didn't realize you were mocking said anon. I'm a bit drunk.
>>462222
What a terrible waste of quads
>>462107
You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, do you?
>>462189
Not neo athiest.
>>462293
>You have absolutely no idea what you're talking about, do you?
>>462303
What is a neo-atheist?
>>462327
Take a guess.
>>462332
I have no idea. I could google it.
Are you saying that you have to read and follow the instructions of the Origin of Species to be a neo-atheist?
>>462322
Ahh, the old 'I know what you are but what am I' defense.
You must be a true renaissance man
>>462363
You only get the responses you deserve
>>462062
Because much of the information in The Origin of Species has been supplanted by newer, and more accurate books and papers.
>>462356
Yes
>>462368
More like the only responses you have
>>462381
Then I'd be very surprised if I ever met a neo-atheist.
