GOD unparalleled tier:
Napoleon Bonaparte
Genghis Khan
High Tier:
Alexander of Macedon
Atilla
Good tier:
Julius Caesar
Tamerlane
Hannibal
Cyrus
Bottom tier:
William the Conqueror
Charlemagne
Augustus Caesar
Suleiman
Meme tier:
Hitler, Mao etc.
>>344695
>Cyrus the Great isn't god tier
>Augustus is in the list at all
>Hannibal
What did he conquer?
Trash desu.
>>344707
>Hannibal
Greatest logistics and military commander
>>344695
>in b4 people meme and confuse military commanders and actual conquerors who took and held land
>>344695
>Napoleon
>God tier
>not Atilla
>>344712
>best logistics
>"m-muh war elephants!"
>"m-muh alpes!"
>"m-muh eye!"
Why Suleiman but no Mehmet?
>>344695
Swtich Napoleon and Alexander, and add Cyrus to high tier and we good mane.
>>344695
napoleon is over rated.
if he was good why was he defeated?
checkmate napoleonfags
>>344695
Alexander should be in God tier considering how huge of an impact the Hellenistic kingdoms had
>>344695
>le Europeans at the bottom
>le orientals at the top
Well meme'd, my ching chong friend
Surely some Rashidun or early Ummayaad should be on the list.
>Atilla
Glorified highwayman, never conquered anything, lost the only major battle, didn't created stable state. Literally all he did was raiding.
>Hannibal
Haven't conquered anything, Spain was his father/step-brother thing.
And you forgot:
Khalid ibn al-Walid
Belisarius
Scipio Africanus
Brasidas for being the Lad of the war
>>344768
>if he was good why was he defeated?
I wonder how Alexander or Caesar would have fared in such situation
>>344745
>Napoleon
>m-muh artillery!
>m-muh coalitions!
>m-muh empire!
>>344799
They would be reasonable enough not to start the war. It's not like Seventh coalition invaded Elba or something.
>>344780
>Scipio Africanus
>Belisarius
>Scipio Africanus
They are strategicians/generals, not actual conquerors.
See: Subutai, Genghis' general.
>>344818
Belisarius managed to take back chunks of Italy.
>Atilla
>conqueror
People need to differentiate between a great conqueror and a great general
winning battles isn't everything
>>344712
>conqueror list
>barely conquered a bunch of Iberians, raided Italy, retained nothing
He is not like Napoleon, who won most of the wars. He was literally defeated in the first war by a better general.
>>344818
Well, yes, but I can't call Justinian "conqueror". And again, Hannibal has no place in the list, he was just a general of Carthage republic.
>>344818
What is your definition of conqueror? Because both of them conquered a lot.
No Timour or Belisarius? Da fug, mang.
>>344849
Tamerlane is "Timour"
>>344872
Because he stayed in Constantinople fucking Theodora and didn't conquered anything?
>>344695
>No Cortes
>No Pizarro
Meh list
>>344893
>ramming down a bunch of native savages
>impressive
>>344909
>ramming down a bunch of native savages
You make it sound like it was the same as the brits conquering Africa
>>344772
>napoleon
>oriental
>alexander
>oriental
go to bed, rosie 'o donnel
>>344893
why are you posting an image of vladimir putin and not simon bolivar?
>>344926
The native empires were really weak, and Spaniards used mostly political maneuver and careful timing.
They did conquer but it's not on that level.
>>344937
I don't have any pics of Simon Bolivar.
He conquered the British Empire.
>>345033
Yeah well Europeans domesticated the fucking Aurochs
>hannibal above people whose states didn't die
>hannibal above failures that managed to at least grab more territory than him
>Charlemagne
>Bottom-tier
Napoleon himself said he was the successor of Charlemagne. He even asked to be announced to the pope as Charlemagne.
>>344872
Because pretty much everyone in the list leaded armies, but Justinian didn't? And he has no excuse, there's plenty of east roman warrior kings and most of his rivals commanded their own armies. Justinian was homo as fuck t.b.h.
>>346568
this, Charlemagne should be higher.
>>344769
>how huge of an impact the Hellenistic kingdoms had
Which had zero to do with his own intentions or ambitions.
>>346583
I don't think any other ruler can tell he rekt saxons with an albino elephant.
>>344812
>Napoleon started the war
How do you even breathe
>>344938
>conquer but it's not on that level.
Nigger one of the largest continents in the world speaks their language and follows their religion to this day.
>>346582
It was customary for Eastern Roman Emperors not to lead armies in person pretty much from the death of Valens right until the reign of Heraclius, and it resulted in two centuries of relatively (by Roman standards) stable succession.
>>346602
>HE WUZ A GOOD BOI
>DIDN DO NUFFING
Are you saying he though they'll let him to return without a war?
>>344759
This
>>344799
He'd already been defeated by then, the shitty odds where his own fault. Also still nothing compared to Alexander's feats.
>>344695
Whenever we talk about anything, you fuckers always forget Sulla.
>>344695
>Bottom tier
>Willian the Conqueror
>Charlemagne
This improved my day
>Caesar
>only good
This is triggering my inner roman fanboy
Nomination candidates:
Hernan Cortes for High Tier
Peter the Great for Good tier
Justinian I for Bottom Tier and Basil II for Good Tier.
>>344889
>he stayed in Constantinople fucking Theodora
Boy's got his priorities straight. Among other things.
Caesar conquered Rome
Subutai conquered most of the Mongol's land too, more than any one man in history, not Temujin
>>348986
Peter got his ass handed to him by the Turks, and only managed to defeat Sweden with the help of the Commonwealth and Saxony
>>344799
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Pharsalus
Would have wrecked them m8.
>>344695
Throw Abu-Bakr or Khalid into high tier, potentially god tier but fuck them for ruining so many good countries.
What about Qin shi huangdi? He is at least bottom tier.
>>344695
>no Qin Shihuang
>no Han Wudi
>no Tang Taizong
>no Ming Taizu
>mentions Mao
Fucking literally shit list kill yourself senpai
>>349557
>He is at least bottom tier.
Are you serious?
>>344695
Very bad list. Bad memed
>>344712
> Paid celtkeks to follow him
> most desert
> has a couple wins in italy, nothing more than shock victories
> keked by his own government, told to stop and come back
> an heros sometime later
>>345059
topkek
>>344695
>Napoleon
are you serious
My list:
God Tier:
>Cyrus the Great
>Alexander the Great
>Qin Shi Huangdi
>Julius Caesar
>Chandragupta Maurya
>Napoleon
>Genghis Khan
>Justinian & Belisarius, bros 4 life
>Khalid ibn al-Walid
Good Tier
>Trajan
>Attila
>Basil II
>Timur
>Pizarro or Cortes
>Piye
Mid-Tier
>Charlemagne
>William of Normandy
>Alp Arslan
>Peter the Great
>Augustus, 2bh f@m
Low tier:
>Shaka Zulu
>Guiseppe Garibaldi
>Otto von-Bismarck
Shit tier:
>Muh Vlad teh Imp (I have actually seen people say him, lol)
>Odoacer
>Hirohito
>Richard the Lionheart
>>349592
Why? I think he at least deserves to be on the list. He united China which is pretty big thing.
>>350131
what about muh oda nobunaga
>>349126
Yeah Peter didn't achieve much more than setting the state for Catherine
