Are there any Protestant denominations that are neither this
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bWHSpmXEJs
Nor fundamentalist?
They seem to be running out.
>>303116
These backsliders need some Paisley
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QIxkrFgb0CI
>>303116
All Christians are evil.
>>303170
I won't spend 30 minutes listening to a dirty mongrel anglo-boot licking fuckboy proddy ulster-scot
This is why Islam is winning.
>>303181
>fenian detected
>>303445
>Presbyterianism is pretty much the video nowadays
Which Presbyterian? If you've actually spent any time looking into this then you know that even within individual denominations there are separate bodies. Such is the beauty/insanity of Reformed theology.
Just as planned.
Christianity, like all religions, exists to serve the needs of the historical moment it is practised in.
Essentialism is essentially bullshit.
>>303116
>neither this
What exactly about that video do you consider to be a problem?
>>303116
protestantism is dead
>>303116
No, it's what happens when you open the pandora's box of "everything is allowed, the only thing that matters is your feel... I mean the scripture, make your own religion! :^)"
>>303652
Come off it. The bibble is so vague on pretty much everything anyone can make their own religion off it.
>>303514
>Which Presbyterian? If you've actually spent any time looking into this then you know that even within individual denominations there are separate bodies. Such is the beauty/insanity of Reformed theology.
PCUSA is what I was thinking of. Which one were you thinking of?
>>303723
“Teacher, which is the greatest commandment in the Law?” 37 Jesus replied: “‘Love the Lord your God with all your heart and with all your soul and with all your mind.’ 38 This is the first and greatest commandment. 39 And the second is like it: ‘Love your neighbor as yourself.’ 40 All the Law and the Prophets hang on these two commandments.”
Yes, very vague.
>>304004
>Which one were you thinking of?
Ian Paisley was a Free Presbyterian but in the States the PCA is pretty conservative.
>>303620
>>304037
Yeah, they're fundamentalists, so I'd think so.
>>304078
Please define "fundamentalist" and then explain why it is a bad thing to be one.
>>304152
>Please define
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/fundamentalism
>why it is a bad thing
Pic related
>>304168
>a movement in 20th century Protestantism emphasizing the literally interpreted Bible as fundamental to Christian life and teaching
Sola Scriptura is not a 20th century development...
If this is how you define "fundamentalism" all Reformed churches will fall into this category.
>>304187
Sola scriptura means you have to take Genesis literally?
>>304195
No, it means that the Bible is fundamental to Christian life and teaching as per the definition you linked.
> Lukegt 1 week ago
There is no direct quote from God that says being gay is a bad thing. They are direct quotes from prophets, who may have lied as well. Read the bible, would God punish someone for being born with something they can't control
>>304203
Re-read what I linked on word at a time.
>>304195
When we read the Bible we need to always take into account factors such as "genre." The opening chapters of Genesis are poetry and should be read as such, however this does not mean they do not convey the truth.
>>304211
You should literally interpret poetry as poetry and just like you should literally interpret history as history.
Genesis is poetry whereas Chronicles is history.
The entire field of hermeneutics is devoted to the proper method of scriptural interpretation.
>>304218
I never said they didn't. I'm saying the PCA is fundamentalist, they don't take into account genre, they take it all as documentary.
And as per OP, Protestant denominations tend to be either that, or they're like the video.
>>304239
Okay, now you're just playing semantics, unless you are oblivious to what "literal" means in this context, which is say evolution is a hoax and the earth is 6,000 years old.
>>304205
yes, because it's against nature. some people are born alcoholics, others psychopaths, should we let them run amok because they "can't help it", which is complete pap, btw? of course not.
>>304205
You aren't born gay. Do you seriously think infant sexuality falls into the gay-straight spectrum?
>>304245
>they don't take into account genre
You are mistaken:
https://creation.com/images/pdfs/tj/j18_3/j18_3_61-62.pdf
>>304251
Semantics are important to a degree and I'm saying that not all "fundamentalists" as defined by Mirriam-Webster are Creationists. We come in a lot of flavors friend.
>2015
>Being a Protestant heretic
>>304310
>ishigt
>>304312
>>304293
PCA is creationist.
