Hitler was a full blown Keynesian, to the point he even inspired Keynesians later on.

>>1412940
>is this accurate?
no but it is written convincing enough convince gullible neo nazis

>>1413437
Not him, but not an argument.

>>1413460
who said I wanted to give an argument? he asked a yes/no question and I answered

>>1412940
Rampant overspending in both the military and civil works, which only paid for itself after
A. Hitler took loans out and refused to pay them back.
B. After annexing Austria and Czechoslovakia, he sold their gold reserves off.

>>1413437
What is inaccurate about it?

>>1413460
You don't need to put forth an argument if the initial assertion lacks intellectual rigor.

>>1413811
What is that initial assertion that lacks intellectual rigor?

>>1413477
Sources?

>>1412940
>https://archive.org/stream/HowHitlerDefiedTheInternationalBankers/HowHitlerDefiedTheBankers_djvu.txt
It's pretty accurate, actually. The author brought up lots of good points. The more you look into history, and the more you look into the motives of people that you've been taught your whole life are evil, the more you know.

>>1412940
It was a giant keynesian bubble ready to collapse on its own weight