>People hailing from the Medieval middle or lower class proposing aristocrat Nepotism rather than Meritocracy
Why is this allowed?
>>1403111
Meritocracy is a lie, those who have merit will turn into nepotism in order to protect their own family, rather than allowing competition.
At least open nepotism is honest about it
>>1403111
>Medieval middle or lower class
Are you retarded?
>>1403133
That don't mean others should aid them in their nepotism or push them to power even when the first in line is far from fit for the task.
>>1403111
>communism
>meritocracy
lol
>>1403111
People who are trained and secure in their power are better leaders than people who are only in power until another smart person comes along or you fail somehow
>>1403215
>No private property or inheritance
>Implying it already hasn't gotten rid of the most glaring obstacles to meritocracy known to man.
>>1403265
>every communist society is infamous for promoting people on how friendly they are to the higher ups, not on merit
>but there's no inheritance so it's a meritocracy
"no"
>>1403274
>implying there has ever been a communist society
wewus ladius
>>1403298
then OP should have posted a Marx Pepe and not a Bolshevik one
enjoy your Lysenkoism
>>1403111
we already had this thread 800 years ago
>>1403215
>caring this much about the cloths of the pepe i posted
>>1403316
Lysenkoism was honestly pretty hilarious
>>1403111
Because that prevents another peasant coming along and taking your job. It's the same reason immigrants are typically against further immigration.
>>1403298
If we've have an endless list of "communist" societies that fail to achieve it's goal of being communist and instead accomplish gross amounts of death and destruction, what makes you think it will work if we try it again?
