Thus spoke Zarathustra or Beyond Good and Evil?
>inb4 both
'no'.
Thus spoke Beyond Good
Evil Zarathustra
>inb4 no
'both'.
>>1385278
Well done.
Are you asking which one to read first? Beyond good and evil if you have to choose between those two. If you're new to nietzsche I'd recommend twilight of the idols.
>>1385287
I want to read one or the other because they are both the same thing? Why would I read both when they are just different iterations of the same ideas?
>>1385291
That's what I have gathered anyway.
>>1385287
>If you're new to nietzsche I'd recommend twilight of the idols.
How does it read? I like reading 'old style' philsophy, I do not like the fact that he created a fictional work to explain his philsophy, much like a lot of modern philsophers do.
I would much rather read the ideas as explained by the person not a story, if I want a story I will find a story.
Guess what I am asking is what is the most 'blatant' books explaining his philsophy.
>>1385269
A genealogy of morals.
All his other books are full of metaphores and aphorisms hard to understand without previous knowledge of his ideas.
