The far right is a big problem here but so are most 'extreme' parties whether they be religious or other wise. Globally the issues we should be tackling are the root causes.
If you look at the concentrated distribution of wealth throughout the west and the rest of the world - you'll see that there is a positive correlation between how poor a nation / region is and how extreme its members of the community are prepared to act.
Evidence points to more access to higher educational materials , not just schooling but open - source leads to people being able to make better rational decisions and to live their lives independently from a doctrine spelt out by the 'masters of mankind' (the masters being powerful people who create doctrines that do not benefit the entire human populous and only a small group of themselves: ISIS, Labour, Conservative, Republican etc) So if people are choosing not to follow extreme ideas because of better wealth distribution - that should be the focus point.
The UK is about to decide whether or not it should leave the EU. If it does leave, this would be a massive regressive step on a chess board to big to comprehend.
>>1306460
> 2000
Bring a better chart, I bet Venezuela is lighter now, maybe Russia too
The chart is neither here nor there. The chart represents a snap shot of time. It is constantly changing. The point is that by treating countries as monoliths we are never going to create an equal society and we will always have a maxim per country that is trying to out do the rest of the world.
The far right is a big problem here but so are most 'extreme' parties whether they be religious or other wise. Globally the issues we should be tackling are the root causes.
Sweden, Finland, UK (if not for fptp), Austria and France all have groups that you would label as "FAR RIGHT EXTREMISTS" leading polls and making up the governments.
>>1306460
First, how is this history? and second
>If it does leave, this would be a massive regressive step on a chess board to big to comprehend.
If the chessboard is too big to comprehend, how can you be sure it is a step back?
