>Is the present king of France bald?
He doesn't look bald
>>1296140
>king of France
>>1296140
Bow before your emperor!
>>1296192
Looks Italian.
Bow to your true King, pretenders.
>>1296140
Wait Franse done have a king?
>>1296263
>>1296192
looks like Trudeau
reminder that the Royalists had many opportunities to re-establish the throne, and lots of popular support but couldn't agree among themselves about who to support
>>1296374
Fuck Napoleon
>>1296140
Fuck off Russel
>>1296263
The only rightful king
>>1296407
He's not rightful in any way.
>>1296374
Ahahah late XIXe French Royalists were such retards. Not like they're better nowadays
>>1296192
He's the great great grandson of Napoleon's brother, not Napoleon himself
>>1296192
looks like a huge smug faggot
>>1296263
>orleanists
Why is this still a thing?
>>1298149
It's not. None of this is a thing.
>>1296377
Long live the Emperor! !
>>1298113
A true Bonapartist emperor should come to power via popular referendum, not because of "muh divine right" or "muh blood". Dynastic Bonapartists think being part of Napoopan's family is a plus, but honestly I don't see why M.Dupont couldn't become a Bonapartist emperor as long as he adheres to their ideals and values.
So if J-C Napoleon decided to go for the throne, good for him, but his ancestry shouldn't play any big part in it.
>>1298286
I can't even begin to imagine how it was to live during the time of Napoleon.
>>1298329
I've got you senpai.
>>1298286
Napoleon should have got the old snibbity snip too.
>>1298342
Go home Jacobin scum you're just as bad as the Royalists without a strong Emperor to keep you both in check.
>>1298349
>Royalists are bad therefore we need a strong emperor
>>1298286
>showing off late for his own coronation then proceed to cuck the pope and crowning himself emperor
all in the same day, what an absolute madman
>>1298353
If you cannot see the difference between a Bonapartist Empire and its doctrines and enlightenement ideals, including the use of plebiscites and a parliament, and the reactionnary royalists supporting divine right monarchy, then I can't help you.
>"muh Louis XVIII"
He may have been a liberal, doesn't mean his ministers and courtiers were.
>>1298403
No, I agree. Royalists are scum. It's just that replacing it with another royal dynasty is retarded.
The only socialism is maximum Jacobinism
>>1298421
But who on earth would choose Jacobinism over Saint-Simonisme?
