Was he really as bloodthirsty as history says he was? it's undisputed that he impaled people, but recently i've read that the other stuff, like roasting children alive, cannibalism, cutting women's tits off was german saxon and turkish propaganda, and russian and romanian sources portray him as a just, fair leader.
He was probably a pretty swell leader to live under, just wouldn't want to be a t*rk
>that is not my name my name is Dracula Untold to you until now
FUCKING REALLY?
Is this the only portrait of him?
>>1281745
No, but it's the only one made when he was alive iirc.
>>1281668
>finally, after all these years, I meet with you VAN HELSING: THE LAST VAMPIRE HUNTER™ (blue-ray edition)
What was that for?
>>1281584
>Was he really as bloodthirsty as history says he was
What "history?" If what "history says" is wrong, how exactly would we know? Or did you mean popular culture? If so, then I can answer pretty confidently that he wasn't a vampire.
>>1281584
Take the middle ground
I'm sure the rumors were started for a reason(was ruthless)
And I'm sure things were real chill under his rule.
Take the minimum of both view ppints
>>1281623
Or a cripple or a poor person
>>1281623
This
