Are his arguments actually good?

>>1274047
They're not arguments.

>>1274047
No.

>There should be no state, we own ourselves and we shouldn't use force
>But property rights are legit because . . . ?

>>1274062
Because you will in an Libertarian society ideally have earned those through treaties you agreed to with others?

>>1274062
Is this guy even a lolbertarian anymore? It seems like he's gone further and further right lately.

>>1274287
He made a video where he said he has stopped believing in rape culture, structural racism and stuff like that and that the Western civilization is now the only one he cares about.

>>1274244
Moly doesn't take these rules about property as being the result of a contract. If he did than it would be that writes are whatever the contract says. Property rights could be removed by consensus.

He takes these rights as a moral ought offering very little to justify it and never really thinking it through that plenty of people will reject that moral ought for some other or discard morality altogeather.

>>1274295
noice

>>1274287
he's basically decided that lolbertarianism will only work in societies made of whites and Asians because everyone else is on average too stupid to not fuck it up

>>1274047
They're shit.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FekLGGOZBuY

>>1274504
>he doesn't realize we live in a society where free market foreign policy is forced on countries that export raw materials, through subterfuge and paramilitary bullshit. Which of course, creates eternal markets for manufactured goods that cannot be produced in coincidentally volatile, yet resource rich areas. So instead he comes across the notion of inherent superiority, as opposed to authoritarian superiority.

ftfy