Is he right /his/?

>>1151740
No, because most of what he discusses as the closing of the Mediterranean occurred during the 6th century due to massive plague and famine, seemingly accounts for every military action by Saracen forces ever but doesn't do the same with Latin activity nor explain and present his methodology for review, says North Africa was depopulated by the Arab conquest because of silt in North African harbors being proof that Arab families all had a minimum of 50 goats and that dhimmi laws said they could graze them on Christian agricultural land (?) when we know cities like Lepcis Magna were all but abandoned before the Arabs even showed up due to desertification, Berber raids over 3 centuries earlier, and mismanagement by military governors in Libya.

For a start.

Pseudo historian driven by hate

>>1152295
Basically this, though I think we should be very scared of Islam.

>>1151740
About the threat that islamic fundamentalism poses?

Yes.

About the specific historical examples he uses to downplay the number of crusades?

No.

The guy is a physics and maths professor

>Dr. Warner’s training in scientific theory and mathematics shaped how he analyzed Islamic doctrine. The first step was realizing that the Islamic texts had been made deliberately difficult to read and comprehend. A program, the Trilogy Project (see below), was created to strip away the confusion in the texts. It became clear that Islam is not constructed on the same civilizational principles as the rest of the world. Simple statistical methods revealed that dualism and submission were the foundational principles of Islamic doctrine.

What a fucking STEMlord