>>1151562
They probably would have been too ineffective to do significant damage

>>1151562
Wasn't the Germans getting oil from Russia at that point?

>>1151589
>>1151592
I'm more curious about the effect this has on the West's relationship with the U.S.S.R.

>>1151601

So you're asking if the attack would have solidified the non-aggression pact?

I would assume if anything it'd just be more incentive for Hitler to break it. Either a further weakened enemy after a successful attack or further surety that it wouldnt develop into war on two fronts.

>>1151562
Things would have gotten retarded, fast.

>>1151601
Not good.

>I would assume if anything it'd just be more incentive for Hitler to break it. Either a further weakened enemy after a successful attack or further surety that it wouldnt develop into war on two fronts.
It would give him every reason to keep it. Stalin would probably extend the loans favorably, because he now has even more reason to enjoy watching the Germans fuck up Britain.

Germany has no need to further diplomatically isolate the British, or the Soviets, since they're doing a great fucking job on both fronts.

>the eternal anglo strikes again