>>1105515
If Japan conquered Rome, practically nothing would change.
The northern barbarians would invade and the Japanese wouldn't be able to stop it.

A blade folded a thousand times is still no match for German Steel.

>>1105531
t. wehraboo

What fucking world are people living on to ask such a stupid question.

>>1105515
Japan was literally in prehistory by the time Rome fell.

>>1105550
This seriously,how the fuck do you expect japan to reach all the way to rome,then again i feel like this is a bait thread in which case 7/10.

dude what if like... the japanese had time machines... and shit... and they'd be invading rome... and like... conquering shit.

t. weeaboo

>>1105515

Japanese art around the time of Rome was a joke.
They were spearchucking riceniggers.

By the way, Japan made an entire anime about that.
https://youtu.be/RjLuYDf-VAY?t=1m52s

>>1105603
I have developed autism just by watching the two first minutes. Thanks.

China would be a more correct parallel. Even then, it would be a toss up on who could conquer who.

>>1105603

Wow, and I thought Code Geass' backstory was stupid.

>>1105651
Neither would conquer the other. You can't rule an empire that stretches from Shanghai to Madrid, especially not with pre-industrial communications technology.

>>1105537
But that's a fact. Name calling doesn't make things not true.

Japan conquering Rome means that Japan somehow managed to march through the entirety of East and Central Asia, into Eastern Europe some of western europe to get to Italy.

Surely that road of conquest would equal Temujin in conquest.

>>1105515
Wasn't Japan literally a shithole with nothing of worth in it for most of the history of Rome?

And I'm not being eurocentic here, I mean a worthless shithole even for the rest of east asians. Like, they were the brits of that area, barbaric and completely irrelevant until late medieval/early modern ages.

>>1105932
Ehh they got involved in some Korean conflicts early in their history but for the most part they were the brits of east asia