In this thread are women to whose recent activities none would be the wiser if not

File: tumblr_o4ji3eJDSS1v01rayo8_1280.jpg (369KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

369KB, 1280x960px

I might not be as great at collecting images as I thought, however I do have some and will not fall short on making you proud.

File: 931259702.jpg (213KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

213KB, 1024x768px

This is a Yvonne or an Allison or something but apparently not the B from my high school.

File: dumb-looking-sluts-stupid-silly-dim-witted-little-fucktoys-30-44.jpg (64KB, 521x858px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

64KB, 521x858px

this one I don't know

File: 7451_17.jpg (156KB, 533x799px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

156KB, 533x799px

Apparently it's called a 'cum walk'? I like my description better.

>>988267
Dude, your description made barely any sense. Learn to form a sentence.

>>988313
Learn to read one.

>>988315
confirming >>988313 in that you have to be borderline illiterate to write that badly.

>>988250
I appreciated it

>>988342
Or you know a sober high school graduate.

>>988313
it's grammatical:

her face is covered in semen
none would be the wiser if not for this fact

=none would be the wiser if not for the fact (that) her face is covered in semen

no one would be the wiser to her(posessive) recent activites

women to whose(posessive) recent activites none would be the wiser [or ... be the wiser to]

In these thread are (women(to whose activities...(if not for the fact...)))

More strictly correct would be: "their faces are" but whatever, you're a dumbass who gets confused by posessive subclauses