Can we have a QUALITY thread?
>>4195687
he said QUALITY not quality
If this is what you consider quality, I'm kind of glad you didn't post more.
>>4195702
you don't understand the term QUALITY, do you
>>4195705
Don't care about your meme.
Shit QUALITY thread.
>>4195719
Scratching up stuff to save it.
>>4195722
>>4195727
>>4195729
>>4195732
>>4195734
What is this?
>>4195732
skeletons need love too
>>4195694
so QUALITY means mosaic censors?
>>4195902
boobs
Eye Spy...
I feel like 80% of shadman's things could be put here
>muh superior nippon art
>>4195722
ugh.. this one is.. Really GOOD.
>>4196128
Dear God, source?
>>4195934
>being this vague
Your thread is bad and you should feel bad
>>4195943
You feel wrong, western is not allowed on /h/.
>>4195940
post yfw this is canon
>>4196180
The fuck angle am I even looking at?
>>4197017
I remember someone drawing it out a while back explaining this picture but I can't figure it out for the life of me anymore
>>4196180
Always was and always will be the single most fucked up hentai image to understand.
After many years of contemplation, I'm pretty sure it involves two girls, but the one on the left is completely fucked up. Her pussy is supposed to be in the girls face, but her legs just seem to disappear. Her "torso" doesn't make any sense, because what should be her bra is shaped badly, as would her (left?) arm be.
Its such a massive clusterfuck.
Well I learned that the majority of /h/ doesn't know what QUALITY is. I guess its more on an /a/ meme.
>>4197048
There have been at least two good debunking pics for that image, I don't have them on hand but I can tell you that it's just one girl, the guy is restraining her by holding her arms behind her back and tit fucking her.
>>4196180
i dont see whats so hard to understand about this picture
Shes being titfucked and have her arms folded behind her head with her shoulders pointing up. should not be that flexible but still not so fucked up. that and the fact that she got nearly no neck
I don't know who thought this pose was a good idea.
>>4195729
That one might no be a mistake.
>>4195629
>pixelated shit = quality
>>4195904
QUALITY means big errors
>>4199960
The QUALITY in that image isn't the mosaic, genius. Look at it. Her huge ass hands to her wonky arms ratio is completely off.
Those fingers and that torso...
>>4195729
I didn't know Soejima drew hentai.
>>4201248
QUALITY is more of a /a/ thing. No one ever used that term the way /a/ does in /h/. You seem more of a newfag than him.
>>4201274
QUALITY is a /a/ thing, but it isn't exclusive there and its generally known outside of it. A good portion of /h/ userbase is /a/, so no, he isn't a newfag. Not knowing what QUALITY is makes you a newfag, even on /h/.
>>4202587
other end of the weewee coming out of the boobie
You can pretty much put a large majority of webms from hentai OVAs.
>>4202612
We want the worst of the worst.
>>4202613
You can put a lot of queen bee shit, there was one webm I can't find of a newly released hentai that was ntr and looked fucking awful.
>>4202618
>You can put a lot of Queen Bee shit
It's a motion comic animation. Don't think you would call it quality when it's purposely done to be a style. Motion comics can't be amazing.
>There was one webm I can't find
You mean Taimanin Yukikaze? That's mostly because of the budget.
>>4195722
Goddammit
That's what I call drawing with your dick.
Can't show cunt tits and ass in that angle ? Break spine -> problem solved.
>>4195702
That's pretty hot.
>>4195734
>>4202700
>Taimanin Yukikaze
Nah, it was some loli ntr. I don't think it was taimanin.
>>4202767
Nevermind you were right, QUALITY is still QUALITY. Doesn't matter. If it has shit animation, it's shit.
>>4203655
>>4203656
>>4203658
>>4202587
mosaic in front of her face? it's a titfuck, the tip of the dick is coming out of her cleavage, need censorship there.
As for her arm positions, something like that i suppose
AYY LMAO
>>4195940
I know it's shit but I just couldn't resist.
Here we have another gaping meat vortex.
>>4196180
>>4205173
ironically i took a crack at it as well when i saw this picture from before.
>>4203659
Only the last panel is full QUALITY
>ITT people who don't understand QUALITY
>>4195729
>>guilty gear character art
>>4205708
GET BACK WITCH!
>>4205726
No, only XX Dizzy and Axl.
>>4201274
I like anime and hentai, but I never touch /a/ because it's horrible.
>>4205688
How can you tell it's QUALITY (or even a gaping meat vortex) if it's censored?
>>4205708
what the actual fuck?
>>4205826
Horrible in what way?
>>4205836
Are there any ways in which it's not horrible?
>>4206187
I asked you first, seeing how you've claimed to never stepped foot in there but you just seem to know. If your complaints are stuff like generals, insistent waifu-posting and the general "newness" of the board nowadays, I can understand.
>>4205831
Are you saying a bunch of pixels causes you to go blind? You are looking at an asshole being spread open (whilst being directly attached to their vagina, might I add) with wrinkled skin on top of that.
How in the fuck is that not QUALITY?
>>4206388
I cried.
Please kys
>>4206362
>You are looking at an asshole being spread open (whilst being directly attached to their vagina, might I add)
Well, now you tell me that.
>with wrinkled skin on top of that.
Not sure how I thought that was normal...
>>4205831
The skin man... look at the skin...
>>4206388
We need to go deeper.
>>4197048
It might be a tiny bit more clear if it were to be uncensored...
>that foot
>that fucking torso
>tfw no one shares your love of laughing at awfully drawn porn
>>4209872
I'm not seeing what's wrong with this one.
>>4209893
Are you blind? Look at the size of that dick and the hand holding it, then compare it to the size of the rest of his body/the girl. It's normal sized in some of the other CG's so its not like it was a /d/ sized dick fetish game.
>>4209922
>What is perspective
Koala Tee
