99designs rebranding...thoughts?
looks clean but it looks like it doesn't really serve a purpose.
>>260404
where's the logo? I just see a font
Not everything needs a logo, Google, Pintrest are examples. It is clean, good spacing. I dont know what it looked like previously so cant really comment on how well it works as a rebrand, that aside its decent. I'd make the purpose of the site more apparent at a glance probably. Also, is it too clean?... maybe.
>>260432
nigga google and pinterest both have logos
That are rarely used , also, 99 designs has one, its like.. 99D, which again is type, but lots of brands have letters for logos.. so, Logo can be type, logos dont need to be everywhere.
>>260445
>brands don't need identities
think about that for a minute faggot
the whole wordmark is only used on client interface...for the designer interface they use pic related
>>260469
it wouldn't really work on the mobile site.
>>260507
same principle on the mobile site...full wordmark for clients, small wordmark for designers
Wow talk about looking more like a goldmine of spec work. Take half decent ideas and combine them yourself in to your very own unique logo original please don't steal, on the backs of tens of submissions.
>>260420
yeah, because every logo has to be a fancy
ambiguous logo thingy.
>FexEx
