What do you think of my opening logo for a small group of film makers back in 2009?
https://youtu.be/MByFQUwttIc
>>254309
its 2016. Why is this relevant?
>>254309
Text should have snapped in at the same moment the clock's hand came to a stop (right before, so they'd stop at the same time) Either that or have it fade in without the horizontal movement.
Audio is cringe worthy, should have gone with a deeper sound. Or one that fades away a bit at least, rather than cutting off straight away. The final stop of the hand shouldn't have made the same sound as the two others since it's never locked in place like it would have been after the completion of the second.
Clock's hands aren't animated at all, just pasted 3 times, not that I wouldn't have expected you to do anything right if you had attempted it. Plus the stretching of the entire thing shows you probably used clipart or something anyway.
Colours contrast too much, at least in the video. You seem to've used a slightly lighter background in the pic, which is okay.
IMO it's overall far too vertical, but that's a choice you can make I guess. To an extent, anyway. Though if the clock weren't all stretched out like it is I doubt it would have been as much of an issue.
>>254319
*would
>>254309
composition is very good, but the artwork is shitty. it's streched - start from that. redraw those hands
