3Dmark Time Spy a big scam? http://www.overclock.net/t/1606
You are currently reading a thread in /g/ - Technology
![3DMCar_678x452[1].png](https://i.imgur.com/I9XYTuo.png "3DMCar_678x452[1].png")
3Dmark Time Spy a big scam?
http://www.overclock.net/t/1606224/various-futuremarks-time-spy-directx-12-benchmark-compromised-less-compute-parallelism-than-doom-aots-also#post_25358335
>>55639259
Good job Pajeet, 20 AMD points have been transferred to your account.
>>55639259
Looks like they are using the nvidia pre-emption and labeling that as "async compute".
Obviously the bias is there. Now what I wonder is, do they use the same preemption for AMD cards as well? Or do AMD cards get the actual parallel async compute? If former, then there's some serious issues with the benchmark. If later, then it might be valid but we'd have to ask how much of it is parallelized?
>>55639326
A reply so sane it killed the thread
>>55639490
Nvidia fags don't like anything that shines a light on bad practices that put their scores into doubt. All I can see is shitposting from them at the moment in most of the other threads.
'1060 is clearly better than a 480' ad nauseam.
So what has done nVidia lately?
>cheated in AOTS benchmark
>cheated in Doom benchmark
>bribed 3Dmark so the benchmark will favor nVidia's cards
Bold move from them, now let's see how shills will defend this.