>four HUNDRED peers
>to 10 seeders
>STILL not seeding
What the fuck!?
Do they not want porn?
>>55610235
>0 (468)
You're not even connected to any you dumb cunt.
>>55610249
Exactly, what the fuck?
>>55610258
You're not even connected to any you dumb cunt.
>>55610274
>there are 10 seeders
>there are hundreds of peers looking for seeders
>and yet none of them want to connect
You're just being pedantic for no reason.
>>55610335
fuck you
No peers are requesting seeding from you. Why is this such a hard concept?
>>55610235
Torrents are useless. Direct links or gtfo
Say there's one seeder of a file no one else has on a really shitty connection and a bunch of seedbox users jump on the torrent. Why do all the seedboxes become locked to the same completion percentage?
>>55610845
Enjoy your 404s idiot.
It's the trackers that connect you (your client) to the peers.
>>55610845
>wait 60 seconds for part 1 of 10
>can only download 1 file a day
fuck u nigger
>>55611736
>can only download 1 file a day
What, is this a seedcuck thing?
>>55611757
>filedog.cuck
>uploaded123.com
>hotdogfiles.com
>megadownload.com
>>55611774
Dude what?
>>55611788
I don't know about the "can only download 1 file a day" thing, but having to wait 3 hours between downloads (unless you pay, of course) is common
>>55611520
>implying torrents never die
Take it from someone who doesn't stop seeding torrents, they do tend to die quite often.
>>55610235
put it on "high priority" if you want to seed it so much
the client is seeing that your connection is probably not worth it OR that too many peers trying to connect OR the tracker is shit
>>55610845
>>55611825
A central file host is literally equivalent (or worse than) a torrent with only one seeder.
>>55611839
Oh yeah, torrents can be better, but not always. There's quite a few torrents that I'm the last seeder on though, and there the occasional times where I have to stop seeding for a bit. I've seen a whole lot of file sharing websites remove files over copyright though.
Really, using more than one way to share files is better than just sticking to one.
>>55610249
>>55610258
>>55610274
>>55610335
>>55610345
Bunch if schoolchildren. Retards.
>>55610235
>Getting mad when you can't download your pedophile games
top kek
>>55611902
I think you missed the point of my post. Compare these two scenarios:
1. Central server stores file. It serves the content with HTTP. If the central server dies, the content is unavailable.
2. Central server stores file. It serves the content via bittorrent (i.e., it acts as a seed). If the central server dies, the torrent is not *necessarily* dead.
tl;dr torrents are always better because they allow your file to outlive the central host, in addition to being more efficient
The burst bandwidth of torrents is much better than direct download though.
If you have something really popular (like the madoka movie), you can torrent the entire thing in a minute, multiplied across thousands of people.
