>>55602271
I dont need a proper explanation or anything just "yeah those arent a ripoff" or "no theyre fucking shit find something else"

>>55602271
let me teach you something

when linking amazon crap, drop all the shit of the link so the fuckers can track naive anons like you, and it's necessary to avoid the kikes that shove referral links to earn shekels doing nothing.

your link should look like:
www.amazon.com/dp/B003JOETX8

not that i give two shits about what you are asking. you should stay on the headphone containment thread.

>>55602271
I own a pair. They sound OK-- not great, but for the money they sound fine. If you are treble sensitive I would steer clear of them, but otherwise the sound is acceptable.

But they are hideously uncomfortable, and they need both replacement pads and careful bending and of the headband to be remotely wearable.

Honestly, the bare minimum open headphone I would recommend is the AKG K240, which still doesn't sound fantastic, but it's incredibly comfortable. Last I checked it was about $56.

As a compromise, you could try the Samson SR850, which I haven't tried, but it's a clone of the K240 using the Superlux drivers. So at least it won't have a brain-dead headband/chassis system. It's about halfway between the Superlux and the AKG in price, at $50.

But really, you should go to headphones general and fill out their template for a recommendation.

>>55602271
try Audio-Technica ATH-M30X,Audio-Technica ATH-M20X ,they are good.comfortable and not super bassy.

TASCAM TH-02
Happy user here