AMD will be launching more Polaris cards in a couple of weeks which will be aimed at the mainstream market. These will include the Radeon RX 470 and Radeon RX 460 which will feature a starting price of $149 US and $99 US respectively. Just like the faster Radeon RX 480 graphics cards, the RX 470 and RX 460 will feature the GCN 4.0 architecture delivering the biggest improvement in terms of performance per watt on AMD Radeon cards.
http://wccftech.com/amd-radeon-rx-470-rx-460-reference-models/
Vega coming in 2017
Nvidia shits all over them
AMD is over
i'm casual as fuck and i will probably only play bf1, csgo, gta 5 and red orchestra 2, should i get a rx 470?
>>55528172
>wccftech
designated indian forums
>>55528326
It seems it will play max settings 1080p@60fps
I'm a BR and stuff here is too expensive, so i will be getting a new PC with a RX470.
It will have about 5Tflops, which is good enough.
>>55528172
>460 tdp is 75w
What a fucking disappointment, I was wishing it will be only 60w.
>>55528172
What are these even for? Th 480 is barely 970 level card which is good for 1080p. Are these lower cards for 720p?
>>55528937
Nvidia officially compared 1060 with their own960, why would you compare 480 with 970?
>>55528172
So are they gonna use a better fan this time around? Something that won't pull 10% of the rated TDP?
At a certain pricepoint PC gaming just isn't for you.
>>55528981
Is that what fucked up the RX480? The fan was drawing too much?
>>55528920
I bet they are delaying these card launch gimping the performance so it doesn't surpass 75w from pcie.
While the 480 are very sexy, I'm with >>55528587 I don't have so many expectations, but it will probably be better than a 380, it might be worth it.
Is the 470 the same 480 chip but with less resources? I'm new to this gpu stuff.
>>55529026
It pulls just south of 15 watts. In hindsight, these smaller cards shouldn't need to dissipate that much energy, so it might be g.
>>55528920
I hope there is no PCIE connector and it ends up drawing >75w through the mobo.
And now the gtx 750 ti will no longer be the around 100 budget card of choice.
>>55529103
>And now the gtx 750 ti will no longer be the around 100 budget card of choice.
the 460 is both more expensive than the 750ti and our sample is slower than the 750ti.
the only '''innovation''' is that the 460 comes with 4gb of ram by default.
>>55529076
At that price point it will never surpass 380.
With my country pricing a 460 will cost at least $190 top, a r9 380 still cost more than $240.
I'm trying to find a better replacement for my five years old 7790 that got 75w tdp, Nvidia might be releasing a 460 rival in the future but if they might set the price point over than $200 in my country so its also a deal breaker for me because i need at least 20 of them.
>>55529126
What is AMD even doing?
>>55529103
>>55529126
GTX 750ti was $149 at launch
GTX 750 was $129 at launch
RX 460 is a replacement of AMD R7 250
>>55529195
the 750ti also launched 3 years ago. these days you can get them for $50-75.
>buying AMD
>ever
G-Sync offers the best gaming experience ever and it's only available on nVidia hardware!
>>55529157
>I'm trying to find a better replacement for my five years old 7790 that got 75w tdp, Nvidia might be releasing a 460 rival in the future but if they might set the price point over than $200 in my country so its also a deal breaker for me because i need at least 20 of them.
what about the bus powered gtx950s? in murica they're $150.
https://www.techpowerup.com/reviews/ASUS/GTX_950/
>>55529126
460 come with 2GB ram model with $99 price point.
>>55529214
I know that.
>>55528937
You dont have to run only the newest games at max settings.
>>55529231
> in murica they're $150.
MSI 950 - 2.655.000, = 202.25
MSI R9 380 - 2.715.000, = 206.82
If I take 950 my TDP will increased by 20w each.
>>55529243
>460 come with 2GB ram model with $99 price point.
no, the only 460 being released has 4GB of vram. $100 is still too much since the 460 performs worse than the 750ti out of the box.
>If I take 950 my TDP will increased by 20w each.
wat? there are 950s with no pcie power connectors and they have 75w TDP, the older ones that have a 6 pin connector are obsolete.
>>55529326
>no, the only 460 being released has 4GB of vram
I'm only quoting OP link.
>>55529326
>there are 950s with no pcie power connectors and they have 75w TDP
https://www.msi.com/Graphics-card/GTX-950-GAMING-2G.html#hero-specification
This is the lowest price 950 I could find in my country online store, it clearly said the tdp is 90w.
I'm not really aiming for a lot of performance gain here, my current 7790 still performing really well for my customers but I'm hoping to sell it in near future since the warrant already expired and I'm worried it will died someday.
My next GPU must used lower TDP and while having significant boost compare to my old 7790.
RX 460 looks really good with the $99 price point(That could be around $150-$190 depend on the stock) but since it got similar TDP. I will wait for the Nvidia releasing the 1050 card.
>>55529376
Thanks!
How good are the 470s? Will an after market possible put it on par with the 480?
