Desktop applications in Qt

Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 2

Anonymous
Desktop applications in Qt 2016-07-07 08:24:53Post No. 55453882
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

File: index.png (3KB, 310x163px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

3KB, 310x163px

Desktop applications in Qt Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:24:53 Post No. 55453882 [Report]

How is Qt these days? Been looking at it to do a semi-native cross-platform desktop project.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:25:43 Post No.55453890
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:25:43 Post No.55453890 [Report]

>>55453882
>How is Qt these days?
Fine. What about you?

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:27:09 Post No.55453907
[Report] Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:27:09 Post No.55453907 [Report]

File: 1411224604361.jpg (108KB, 600x610px) Image search: [Google] [Yandex] [Bing]

108KB, 600x610px

>>55453890
Look at you

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:27:35 Post No.55453913
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:27:35 Post No.55453913 [Report]

>>55453882
GTK+ is dead and their developers are planning on breaking API every 6 months. If you value your sanity there is no other choice but Qt for cross-platform.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:37:28 Post No.55454019
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 08:37:28 Post No.55454019 [Report]

>>55453882
I've been using it lately as PyQt to make some small desktop apps for Windows and GNU/Linux and compiling it with PyInstaller.

If you know C++ or Python, go for it, plenty of support and you'll be able to deploy your program quickly and with little dependency.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 10:02:48 Post No.55454809
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 10:02:48 Post No.55454809 [Report]

>>55453913
>GTK+ is dead
Erm... no? Qt has some advantages for sure, but it's fuck ugly.

>>

Anonymous 2016-07-07 10:17:35 Post No.55454911
[Report]

Anonymous 2016-07-07 10:17:35 Post No.55454911 [Report]

>>55454809
>but it's fuck ugly.
>this is what GTKfags ACTUALLY believe