How is Qt these days? Been looking at it to do a semi-native cross-platform desktop project.
>>55453882
>How is Qt these days?
Fine. What about you?
>>55453890
Look at you
>>55453882
GTK+ is dead and their developers are planning on breaking API every 6 months. If you value your sanity there is no other choice but Qt for cross-platform.
>>55453882
I've been using it lately as PyQt to make some small desktop apps for Windows and GNU/Linux and compiling it with PyInstaller.
If you know C++ or Python, go for it, plenty of support and you'll be able to deploy your program quickly and with little dependency.
>>55453913
>GTK+ is dead
Erm... no? Qt has some advantages for sure, but it's fuck ugly.
>>55454809
>but it's fuck ugly.
>this is what GTKfags ACTUALLY believe